Some morphological and anatomical studies of leaves and flowers of Murraya paniculata (Jack) Linn. in vivo and in vitro

Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Volumn 11, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1021-1026

  Taha, Rosna Mat ^a   Haron, Noorma Wati ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Anatomy; In vitro flowering; Macromorphology; Murraya paniculata; Tissue culture

Indexed keywords

1 NAPHTHYLACETIC ACID; 1-NAPHTHALENEACETIC ACID; ARYLACETIC ACID DERIVATIVE; BENZYL DERIVATIVE; BENZYLADENINE; PHYTOHORMONE; PURINE DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COTYLEDON; CULTURE MEDIUM; CYTOLOGY; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFECT; FLOWER; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; MURRAYA; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; PLANT LEAF; PLANT STEM; TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

BENZYL COMPOUNDS; COTYLEDON; CULTURE MEDIA; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; FLOWERS; MURRAYA; NAPHTHALENEACETIC ACIDS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT SHOOTS; PLANT STEMS; PURINES; TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES;

MURRAYA; MURRAYA PANICULATA;

EID: 53749087533     PISSN: 10288880     EISSN: 18125735     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2008.1021.1026     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Abdullah, H., 1998. Cellular activities and flowering of Petunia hybrida Vilm. Var. White innocence in vitro. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
2. Bhojwani, S.S. and M.K. Razdan, 1996. Plant Tissue Culture: Theory and Practice. A Revised Edn. Elsevier, Armsterdam-Oxford, Tokyo.
3. Dilcher, D.L., 1974. Approaches to the identification of angiosperm leaf remains. Bot. Rev., 40: 1-157.
4. Hanson, H.C., 1917. Leaf structure as related to environment. Am. J. Bot., 4 (1): 533-559.
5. Johansen, D.A., 1940. Plant Microtechnique. McGraw Hill, New York.
6. Larkin, P.J. and W.R. Scowcroft, 1981. Somaclonal variation-a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theor. Applied Genet., 60: 197-214.
7. McDaniel, C.N., R.W. King and L.T. Evans, 1991. Floral determination and in vitro floral differentiation in isolated shoot apices of Lolium temulentum L. Planta, 185: 9-16.
8. Murashige, T. and F. Skoog, 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol. Plant., 15: 473-497.
9. Pierik, R.L.M., 1967. Factors Affecting the Induction and Initiation of Flower Buds in vitro in Plant Species with a Cold Requirement for Flowering. In: Cellular and Molecular Aspects of Floral Induction, Bernier, G. (Ed.). Longman Group Ltd., London, pp: 408-415.
10. Ryder, V.L., 1954. On the morphology of leaves. Bot. Rev., 20 (1): 263-276.
11. Sachs, R.M., A.M. Kofranek and S.Y. Shyr, 1967. Gibberellin-induced inhibition of floral initiation in Fuchsia. Am. J. Bot., 54: 921-929.
12. Taha, R.M. and D. Francis, 1990. The relationship between polyploidy and organogenetic potential in embryo and root-derived tissue culture of Vicia faba L. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult., 22: 229-236.
13. Taha, R.M., 1993. Tissue culture studies of Citrus hystrix D.C. and Severinia buxifolia (Poir) Tenore. Asia Pacific J. Mol. Biol. Biotechnol., 1 (1): 36-42.
14. Tanimoto, S., 1981. Chemical factors controlling flower bud formation of Torenia stem segments cultured in vitro. II. Effect of growth regulators. Ibid, 22: 543-550.
15. Tanimoto, S. and H. Harada, 1981. Chemical factors controlling flower bud formation of Torenia stem segments cultured in vitro. I. Effect of mineral salts and sugars. Plant Cell Physiol., 22: 533-541.
16. Wilkinson, H.P., 1979. Plant Surface. In: Anatomy of the Dicotyledon, Metcalfe and Chalk (Eds.). Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1: 97-162.
17. Zeevart, J.A.D., 1967. Gibberellins and Flower Formation. In: Cellular and Molecular Aspects of Floral Induction, Bernier, G. (Ed.). Proceedings of Symposium Liege, Belgium, pp: 19.