Defining temporal spatial patterns of mega city Istanbul to see the impacts of increasing population

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

Volumn 146, Issue 1-3, 2008, Pages 267-275

  Sanli, Fusun Balik ^a   Balcik, Filiz Bektas ^b   Goksel, Cigdem ^b  

^a YILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Landsat; Monitoring; Post classification change detection; Remote sensing; Urban development

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ITERATIVE METHODS; LAND USE; MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; REGIONAL PLANNING; ROADS AND STREETS; SIGNAL DETECTION; STATISTICAL METHODS; STORAGE ALLOCATION (COMPUTER); URBAN PLANNING;

LANDSAT; MONITORING; POST CLASSIFICATION CHANGE DETECTION; REMOTE SENSING; URBAN DEVELOPMENT;

POPULATION STATISTICS;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; CLASSIFICATION; DETECTION METHOD; LAND COVER; LAND USE PLANNING; LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER; MEGACITY; METROPOLITAN AREA; MONITORING; POPULATION GROWTH; REMOTE SENSING; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN POPULATION; URBANIZATION;

ARTICLE; CITY PLANNING; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FOREST MANAGEMENT; LAND USE; MINING; SEA SURFACE WATERS; TURKEY (REPUBLIC); URBAN AREA; URBANIZATION;

ENVIRONMENT; HUMANS; POPULATION GROWTH; TURKEY; URBAN POPULATION;

EURASIA; ISTANBUL [TURKEY]; TURKEY;

EID: 53649103559     PISSN: 01676369     EISSN: 15732959     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-007-0078-4     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Anderson, J. R., Hardy, E. E., Roach, J. T., & Witmer, R. E. (1976). A land-use and land-cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. Washington, DC: US Geological Survey Professional Paper 964.
2. Bektas, F., & Goksel, C. (2005). Remote sensing and GIS integration for land cover analysis, A case study: Bozcaada Island. Water Science and Technology, 51 (11), 239-244.
3. Dean, A. M., & Smith, G. M. (2003). An evaluation of per parcel land cover mapping using maximum likelihood class probabilities. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24 (14), 2905-2920.
4. European Commission (1998). Remote sensing of Mediterranean desertification and environmental changes (Resmedes). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
5. Foody, G. M. (2002). Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80, 185-201.
6. Fung, T., & Siu, W. (2000). Environmental quality and its changes, an analysis using NDVI. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21 (5), 1011-1024.
7. Guild, L. S., Cohen, W. B., & Kauffman, J. B. (2004). Detection of deforestation and land conversion in Rondônia, Brazil using change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25 (4), 731-750.
8. Jensen, J. R. (2004). Digital change detection. Introductory digital image processing: A remote sensing perspective (pp. 467-494). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
9. Kwarteng, A. Y., & Chavez, P. S. (1998). Change detection study of Kuwait City and environments using multi-temporal Landsat Thematic Mapper data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19, 1651-1662.
10. Lunetta, R. S., & Balogh, M. (1999). Application of multi-temporal Landsat 5 TM imagery for wetland identification. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 65, 1303-1310.
11. Lyon, J. G., & Green, R. G. (1992). Use of aerial photographs to measure the historical extent of Lake Erie coastal wetlands. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 58 (9), 1355-1360.
12. Mas, J.-F. (1999). Monitoring land-cover changes: A comparison of change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20, 1139-1152.
13. Masek, J. G., Lindsay, F. E., & Goward, S. N. (2000). Dynamics of urban growth in the Washington DC metropolitan area 1973-1996, from Landsat observations. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21, 3473-3486.
14. Munyati, C. (2000). Wetland change detection on the Kafue Flats, Zambia, by classification of a multitemporal remote sensing image dataset. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21 (9), 1787-1806.
15. Rosenfield, G. H., & Fitzpatrick-Lins, K. (1986). A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 52, 223-227.
16. Serra, P., Pons, X., & Saurí D. (2003). Post-classification change detection with data from different sensors: Some accuracy considerations. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24 (16), 3311-3340.
17. Singh, A. (1989). Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 6, 989-1003.
18. SIS, State Institute of Statistics (2006). www.die.gov.tr (accessed 14 July. 2006).
19. Sommer, S., Hill, J., & Megier, J. (1998). The potential of remote sensing for monitoring rural land use changes and their effects on soil conditions. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 67, 197-209.
20. Verbyla, D. L. (1995). Satellite remote sensing of natural resources. Boca Raton: CRC (ISBN 1-55670-107-4).
21. Young, S. S., & Wang, C. Y. (2001). Land-cover change analysis of China using global-scale Pathfinder AVHRR Landcover (PAL) data, 1982-92. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22 (8), 1457-1477.
22. Yuan, F., Sawaya, K. E., Loeffelhoz, B. C., & Bauer, M. E. (2005). Land cover classification and change analysis of the twin cities (Minnesota) Metropolitan Area by multitemporal Landsat remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 98, 317-328.
23. Yuanbo, L., Nishiyama, S., & Yano, T. (2004). Analysis of four change detection algorithms in bi-temporal space with a case study. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25 (11), 2121-2139.