Application of different training methodologies for the development of a back propagation artificial neural network retention model in ion chromatography

Journal of Chemometrics

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 106-113

  Bolanča, Tomislav ^a   Cerjan Stefanović, Štefic ^a   Ukić, Šime ^a   Rogošić, Marko ^a   Luša, Melita ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB   (Croatia)

Author keywords

Artificial neural network; Ion chromatography; Retention modeling; Training algorithm

Indexed keywords

CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; FLUORINE COMPOUNDS; IONS; NEURAL NETWORKS; SULFUR COMPOUNDS;

ACTIVATION FUNCTIONS; BACK PROPAGATION; DEVELOPED MODEL; HIDDEN LAYERS; PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS; PREDICTIVE ABILITIES; RELATIVE ERRORS; RETENTION MODELING; RETENTION PREDICTION; TRAINING ALGORITHMS;

ION CHROMATOGRAPHY;

EID: 53649100899     PISSN: 08869383     EISSN: 1099128X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cem.1096     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Balke ST. Quantitative Column Liquid Chromatography: A Survey of Chemometric Methods. Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1984.
2. Schoenmakers PJ. Optimisation of Chromatographic Selectivity: A Guide to Method Development. Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1986.
3. Ahuja S. Selectivity and Detectability Optimisation in HPLC. Wiley: New York, 1989.
4. Snyder LR. The future of chromatography: optimizing the separation. Analyst 1991; 116: 1237-1244.
5. Smith RM (ed.). Retention and Selectivity in Liquid Chromatography. Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1995.
6. Lukulay PH, McGuffin VL. The evolution from univariate to multivariate optimization methods in liquid chromatography. J. Microcolumn Sep. 1996; 8: 211-224.
7. Snyder LR. Practical HPLC Method Development (2nd edn.). Wiley: New York, 1997.
8. Siouffi AM, Phan-Tan-Luu R. Optimization methods in chromatography and capillary electrophoresis. J. Chromatogr. 2000; A 892: 75-106.
9. Torres-Lapasió JR, García-Álvarez-Coque MC. Levels in the interpretive optimisation of selectivity in high-performance liquid chromatography: a magical mystery tour. J. Chromatogr. 2006; A 1120: 308-321.
10. Schoenmakers PJ, Billiet HAH, de Galan L. Use of gradient elution for rapid selection of isocratic conditions in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 1981; 205: 13-30.
11. Quarry MA, Grob RL, Snyder LR. Prediction of precise isocratic retention data from two or more gradient elution runs. Analysis of some associated errors. Anal. Chem. 1986; 58(4): 907-917.
12. Vivó-Truyols G, Torres-Lapasió JR, García- Álvarez-Coque MC. Error analysis and performance of different retention models in the transference of data from/to isocratic/gradient elution. J. Chromatogr. 2003; A 1018: 169-181.
13. Bolanča T, Cerjan-Stefanović Š, Luša M, Rogošić M, Ukić Š. Development of an ion chromatographic gradient elution retention model from isocratic elution experiments. J. Chromatogr. 2006; A 1121: 228-235.
14. Gjerde DT, Schmuckler G, Fritz JS. Anion Chromatography with low-conductivity eluents. II. J. Chromatogr. 1980; 187: 35-45.
15. Haddad PR, Cowie CE. Computer-assisted optimization of eluent concentration and pH in ion chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 1984; A 303: 321-330.
16. Jenke DR, Pagenkopf GK. Optimization of anion separation by nonsuppressed ion chromatography. Anal. Chem. 1984; 56: 85-88.
17. Jenke DR, Pagenkopf GK. Models for prediction of retention in nonsuppressed ion chromatography. Anal. Chem. 1984; 56: 88-91.
18. Jenke DR. Modeling of analyte behavior in indirect photometric chromatography. Anal. Chem. 1984; 56: 2674-2681.
19. Maruo M, Hirayama N, Kuwamoto T. Ion chromatographic elution behaviour and prediction of the retention of inorganic monovalent anions using a phosphate eluent. J. Chromatogr. 1989; 481: 315-322.
20. Jenke DR. Prediction of retention characteristics of multiprotic anions in ion chromatography. Anal. Chem. 1994; 66: 4466-4470.
21. Hajos P, Horvath O, Denke V. Prediction of retention for halide anions and oxanions in suppressed ion chromatography using multiple species eluent. Anal. Chem. 1995; 67: 434-441.
22. Novií Mi, Zupan J, Novič Ma. Computer simulation of ion chromatography separation: an algorithm enabling continous monitoring of anion distribution on an ion-exchange chromatography column. J. Chromatogr. 2001; A 922: 1-11.
23. Madden JE, Avdalovic N, Haddad PR, Havel J. Prediction of retention times for anions in linear gradient elution ion chromatography with hydroxide eluents using artificial neural networks. J. Chromatogr. 2001; A 910: 173-179.
24. Madden JE, Haddad PR. Critical comparison of retention models for optimisation of the separation of anions in ion chromatography: I. Non-suppressed anion chromatography using phthalate eluents and three different stationary phases. J. Chromatogr. 1998; A 820: 65-80.
25. Madden JE, Haddad PR. Critical comparison of retention models for the optimisation of the separation of anions in ion chromatography: II. Suppressed anion chromatography using carbonate eluents. J. Chromatogr. 1999; A 850: 29-41.
26. Madden JE, Avdalovic N, Jackson PE, Haddad PR. Critical comparison of retention models for optimisation of the separation of anions in ion chromatography: III. Anion chromatography using hydroxide eluents on a Dionex AS11 stationary phase. J. Chromatogr. 1999; A 83: 65-74.
27. Bolanča T, Cerjan-Stefanovic Š, Regelja M, Regelja H, Lončarić S. Application of artificial neural networks for gradient elution retention modelling in ion chromatography. J.Sep. Sci. 2005; 28: 1427-1433.
28. Bolanča T, Cerjan-Stefanović Š, Regelja M, Regelja H, Lončarić S. Development of an inorganic cations retention model in ion chromatography by means of artificial neural networks with different two phase training algorithms. J. Chromatogr. 2005; A 1085: 74-85.
29. Havel J, Madden JE, Haddad PR. Prediction of retention times for anions in ion chromatography using artificial neural networks. Chromatographia 1999; 49: 481-488.
30. Maren A, Harston C, Pap R. Handbook of Neural Computing Applications. Academic Press: London, 1990.
31. Pham DT, Sagiroglu S. Three methods of training multi-layer perceptrons to model a robot sensor. J. Eng. Manufacture 1996; 210: 69-76.
32. Alpsan D, Towsey M, Ozdamar O, Tsoi AC, Ghista DN. Efficacy of modified backpropagation and optimisation methods on a real-world medical problem. Neural Netw. 1995; 8(6): 945-962.
33. Tang KW, Pingle G, Srikant G. Artificial neural networks for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J. Intell Syst. 1997; 7: 307-338.
34. Stager F, Agarwal M. Three methods to speed up the training of feedforward and feedback perceptrons. Neural Netw. 1997; 10(8): 1435-1443.
35. Drake R, Packianather MS. A decision tree of neural networks for classifying images of wood veneer. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 1998; 14: 280-285.
36. Devika P, Achenie L On the use of quasi-newton based training of a feed forward neural network for time series forecasting.J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 1995; 3: 287-299.
37. Demuth HB, Beale M. Neural Network Toolbox for Use with MATLAB, User's Guide. The MathWorks, Inc.: Natick, MA, USA, 2004.
38. Vogl TP, Mangis JK, Zigler AK, Zink WT, Alkon DL Accelerating the convergence of the backpropagation method. Biol. Cybern. 1988; 59: 256-264.
39. Chong EKP, Zak SH. An Introduction to Optimization. Wiley: Singapore, 2004.
40. Hagan MT, Menhaj MB. Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 1994; 5(6): 989-993.