Modeling based on subspace orthogonal projections for QSAR and QSPR research

Journal of Chemometrics

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 23-35

  Liang, Yizeng ^a   Yuan, Dalin ^a   Xu, Qingsong ^a   Kvalheim, Olav Martin ^b  

^a CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

Chemical modeling; Orthogonalization of block variables; PCR; PLS; Projection pursuit; QSAR and QSPR

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY; MOLECULAR GRAPHICS;

CHEMICAL MODEL; MODEL METHOD; ORTHOGONALIZATION; ORTHOGONALIZATION OF BLOCK VARIABLE; PCR; PLS; PROJECTION PURSUITS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP AND QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE PROPERTY RELATIONSHIP; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE PROPERTY RELATIONSHIPS;

MONTE CARLO METHODS;

EID: 53649088339     PISSN: 08869383     EISSN: 1099128X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cem.1094     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Devillers J, Balaban AT. Historical development of topological indices. Topological Indices and Related Descriptors in QSAR and QSPR. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers: The Netherlands, 1998.
2. Hall LH, Kier LB. Molecular Structure Description: The Electrotopological State. Academic Press: New York, America, 1999.
3. Morales DA, Araujo O. On the search for best correlation between graph theoretical invariants and physicochemical properties. J. Math. Chem. 1993;13:95-106.
4. Cramer III RD, Patterson DE, Bunce JD. Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988; 110: 5959-5967.
5. Gramatica P, Navas N, Todeschini R. 3D-modelling and prediction by WHIM descriptors. Part 9. Chromatographic relative retention time and physico-chemical properties of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1998; 40: 53-63.
6. Klein CT, Kaiser D, Ecker G. Topological distance based 3d descriptors for use in QSAR and diversity analysis. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004; 44: 200-209.
7. Harald M, Tormod N. Multivariate Calibration. John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Chichester, UK,1989.
8. Wold S, Eriksson L, Sjöström M. Portial Least Squares (PLS) in Chemistry. In Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry, Schreiner P (ed.). Wiley: New York, 1999; 2006-2020.
9. Wold S, Sjöström M, Eriksson L. PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2001; 58: 109-130.
10. Saxena AK, Prathipati P. Comparison of MLR, PLS and GA-MLR in QSAR analysis. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 2003; 14: 433-445.
11. Du Y, Liang Y, Li B, Xu C. Orthogonalization of block variables by subspace-projection for quantitative structure property relationship (QSPR) research. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002; 42: 993-1003.
12. Du Y, Liang Y, Yun D. Data mining for seeking an accurate quantitative relationship between molecular structure and GC retention indices of alkenes by projection pursuit. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002; 42: 1283-1292.
13. Nikolova N, Jaworska J. Approaches to measure chemical similarity - a review. QSAR Comb. Sci. 2003; 22: 1006-1026.
14. Draper NR, Smith H. Applied Regression Analysis. John Wiley and Sons: New York, USA, 1981.
15. Furnival GM, Wilson RW. Regressions by leaps and bounds. Technometrics 1974;16:499-511.
16. Hasegawa K, Funatsu K. GA strategy for variable selection in QSAR studies: GAPLS and D-optimal designs for predictive QSAR model. J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM) 1998; 425: 255-262.
17. Goldberg DE. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization & Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley: New York, 1989.
18. Hibbert DB. Genetic algorithm in chemistry. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1993; 19: 277-293.
19. Katritzky AR, Lobanov VS, Karelson M. CODESSA Version 2.0 Reference Manual. University of Florida: Gainesville, FL, 1994.
20. Wikel JH, Dow ER. The use of neural networks for variable selection in QSAR. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1993; 3: 645-651.
21. Sutter JM, Dixon SL, Jurs PC. Automated descriptor selection for quantitative-structure-activity relationships using generalized simulated annealing. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1995; 35: 77-84.
22. Lucic B, Trinajstic N. A new efficient approach for variable selection based on multiregression: prediction of gas chromatographic retention times and response factors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999; 39: 610-621.
23. Taraviras SL, Ivanciuc O, Bass DC. Identification of groupings of graph theoretical molecular descriptors using a hybrid cluster analysis approach. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000; 40: 1128-1146.
24. Ivanciuc O, Taraviras SL, Cabrol-Bass D. Quasi-orthogonal basis sets of molecular graph descriptors as a chemical diversity measure. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000; 40: 126-134.
25. Randic M. Resolution of ambiguities in structure-property studies by use of orthogonal descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1991; 31: 311-320.
26. Amic D, Davidovic-Amic D, Trinajstic N. Calculation of retention times of anthocyanins with orthogonalized topological indices.J Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1995; 35: 136-139.
27. Lucic B, Nikolic S, Trinajstic N, Juretic D. The structure-property models can be improved using the orthogonalized descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1995; 35: 532-538.
28. Soskic M, Plavsic D, Trinajstic N. 2-Difluoromethylthio-4,6-bis- (monoalkylamino) -1,3,5-triazines as inhibitors of Hill reaction: a QSAR study with orthogonal descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996; 36: 829-832.
29. Xu L, Zhang WJ. Comparison of different methods for variable selection. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2001; 446: 477-483.
30. Balaban AT, Ivanciuc O. Historical development of topological indices. In Topological Indices and Related Descriptors in QSAR and QSPR, Devillers J, Balaban AT (eds). Gordon and Breach Science Publishers: Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1999; 21-57.
31. Motoc I, Balaban AT. Toplogical indices: intercorrelations, physical meaning, correlational indices ability. Rev. Roum. Chim. 1981; 26: 593-600.
32. Motoc I, Balaban AT, Mekenyan O, Bonchev D. Topological indices: inter-relations and composition. MATCH (Commun. Math. Chem.) 1982; 13: 369-404.
33. Hu Q, Liang Y, Yin H, Peng X, Fang K. Structural interpretation of the topological index. 2. The molecular connectivity index, the Kappa index, and the atom-type E-State index. J Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004; 44: 1193-1201.
34. Shen JW, Hu QN, Liang YZ. Application of subspace comparison method in studying the relationship between topological block variables and variable selection. Chem. J. Chin. Uni. (Chin.) 2005; 26: 39-42.
35. Kier LB, Hall LH. Molecular Connectivity in Chemistry and Drug Research. Academic Press: New York, USA, 1976.
36. Kier LB, Hall LH. The kappa indices for modeling molecular shape and flexibility. In Topological Indices and Related Descriptors in QSAR and QSPR, Devillers J, Balaban AT (eds). Gordon and Breach Science Publishers: Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1999; 455-489.
37. Kier LB, Hall LH. An electrotopological-state index for atoms in molecules. Pharma. Res. 1990; 7: 801-807.
38. Akhlaghi Y, Kompany-Zareh M. Application of radial basis function networks and successive projections algorithm. J. Chemometrics 2006; 20: 1-12.
39. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. Springer: New York, USA, 2001.
40. Kirkpatrick P, Ellis C. Chemical space. Nature 2004; 432: 823-865.
41. Guha R, Jurs PC. Determining the validity of a QSAR model - a classification approach. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005; 45: 65-73.
42. Hawkins DM, Basak SC, Mills D. Assessing model fit by cross-validation. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003; 43: 579-586.
43. De Maesschalck R, Jouan-Rimbaud D, Massart DL The Mahalanobis distance. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2000; 50:1-18.
44. Xu Q, Liang Y, Du Y. Monte Carlo cross-validation for selecting a model and estimating the prediction error in multivariate calibration. J. Chemometrics 2004; 18: 112-120.
45. Shao J. Bootstrap model selection. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1996; 91: 655-665.
46. Katritzky AR, Chen K, Maran U, Carlson DA. QSPR correlation and predictions of GC retention indexes for methyl-branched hydrocarbons produced by insects. Anal. Chem. 2000; 72: 101-109.
47. Lai WC, Song CS. Temperature-programmed retention indices for G.C and M.S. analysis of coal- and petroleum- derived liquid fuels. Fuel 1995; 74: 1436-1451.
48. Katritzky AR, Chen K, Wang Y, Karelson M, Lucic B, Trinajstic N. Prediction of liquid viscosity for organic compounds by a quantitative structure-property relationship. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2000; 13: 80-86.
49. Ivanciuc O, Ivanciuc T, Filip P, Cabrol-Bass D. Estimation of the liquid viscosity of organic compounds with a quantitative structure-property model. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999; 39: 515-524.
50. Suzuki T, Ohtaguchi K, Koide K. Computer-assisted approach to develop a new prediction method of liquid viscosity of organic compounds. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1996; 20:161-173.
51. Guha R, Dutta D, Jurs PC, Chen T. Local lazy regression: making use of the neighborhood to improve QSAR predictions. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006; 46: 1836-1847.
52. Kvalheim OM. A partial-least squares approach to interpretative analysis of multivariate data. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1988; 3: 189-197.