Reproduction of pike (Esox lucius) in reed belt shores of the SW coast of Finland, Baltic Sea: A new survey approach

Boreal Environment Research

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 370-380

  Lappalainen, Antti ^a   Härmä, Meri ^a,b   Kuningas, Sanna ^b   Urho, Lauri ^a  

^a FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ESOX LUCIUS;

EID: 53649085743     PISSN: 12396095     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Anon. 2004. Recreational Fishing 2002. Official Statistics of Finland. Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery 2004:51.
2. Anttila R. 1973. Effects of sewage on the fish fauna in the Helsinki area. Oikos Suppl. 15: 226-229.
3. Bonsdorff E., Blomqvist E.M., Mattila J. & Norkko A. 1997. Long-term changes and coastal eutrophication. Examples from the Åland Islands and the Archipelago Sea, northern Baltic Sea. Oceanol. Acta 20: 319-329.
4. Bry C. 1996. Role of vegetation in the life cycle of pike. In: Craig J.F. (ed.), Pike: biology and exploitation, Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 45-67.
5. Carlander K.D., Campbell J.S. & Muncy R.J. 1978. Inventory of percid and esocid habitat in North America. Am. Fish. Soc. Spec. Publ. 11: 7-38.
6. Casselman J.M. & Lewis C.A. 1996. Habitat requirements of northern pike (Esox lucius). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53: 161-174.
7. Cederwall H. & Elmgren R. 1990. Biological effects of eutrophication of the Baltic Sea, particularly the coastal zone. Ambio 19: 109-112.
8. Crossman E.J. 1996. Taxonomy and distribution. In: Craig J.F. (ed.), Pike: biology and exploitation, Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 1-11.
9. Ekebom J. & Erkkilä A. 2003. Using aerial photography for identification of marine and coastal habitats under the EU's Habitats Directive. Aquatic Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 13: 287-304.
10. Farrell J.M. & Werner R.G. 1996. Egg distribution and spawning habitat of northern pike and muskellunge in a St. Lawrence marsh, New York. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 125: 127-131.
11. Franklin D.R. & Smith L.L.Jr. 1963. Early life history of the northern pike, Esox lucius L., with special reference to the factors influencing the numerical strength of year classes. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 92: 91-110.
12. Howe R.W., Davis G.J. & Mosca V. 1991. The demographic significance of 'sink' populations. Biol. Conserv. 57: 239-255.
13. Hudd R., Urho L. & Hildén M. 1983. Occurrence of burbot, Lota lota L., larvae at the mouth of Kyrönjoki in Quarken, Gulf of Bothnia. Aquilo Ser. Zool. 22: 127-130.
14. Hänninen J., Vuorinen I. & Hjelt P. 2000. Climatic factors in the Atlantic control the oceanographic and ecological changes in the Baltic Sea. Limnol. Oceanogr. 45: 703-710.
15. Isæus M. 2004. Factors structuring Fucus communities at open and complex coastlines in the Baltic Sea. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Botany, Stockholm University.
16. Karås P. & Lehtonen H. 1993. Patterns of movement and migration of pike (Esox lucius L.) in the Baltic Sea. Nordic J. Freshw. Res. 68: 72-79.
17. Kennedy M. 1969. Irish pike investigations. 1. Spawning and early life history. Irish Fisheries Investigation Series A 5: 4-33.
18. Kristan W.B.III 2003. The role of habitat selection behaviour in population dynamics: source-sink systems and ecological traps. Oikos 103: 457-468.
19. Lehtonen H. 1986. Fluctuations and long-term trends in the pike, Esox lucius (L.), population in Nothamn, western Gulf of Finland. Aqua Fenn. 16: 3-9.
20. Lehtonen H. & Hudd R. 1990. The importance of estuaries for the reproduction of freshwater fish in the Gulf of Bothnia. In: van Densen W.L.T., Steinmetz B. & Hughes R.H. (eds.), Management of freshwater fisheries, Pudoc Wageningen, pp. 82-89.
21. Lindroth A. 1946. Zur Biologie, Der Befruchtung und Ent wicklung beim Hecht. Kungl Lantbruksstyrelsen Stockholm 24: 1-173.
22. Luther H. 1981. Occurrence and ecological requirements of Fucus vesiculosus in semi-enclosed inlets in the Archipelago Sea, SW Finland. Ann. Bot. Fennici 18: 187-200.
23. Nilsson J., Andersson J., Karås P. & Sandström O. 2004. Recruitment failure and decreasing catches of perch (Perca fluviatilis) and pike (Esox lucius) in the coastal waters of southeast Sweden. Boreal Env. Res. 9: 295-306.
24. Pulliam H.R. 1988. Sources, sinks and population regulation. Am. Nat. 132: 652-661.
25. Raat A.J.P. 1988. Synopsis of biological data on the northern pike, Esox lucius Linnaeus, 1758. FAO Fish Synopsis 30: 1-178.
26. Sandström A., Eriksson B.K., Karås P., Isæus M. & Schreiber H. 2005. Boating and navigation activities influence the recruitment of fish in a Baltic Sea Archipelago area. Ambio 34: 125-130.
27. Sandström A. & Karås P. 2002. Effects of eutrophication on young-of-the-year freshwater fish communities in coastal areas of the Baltic. Env. Biol. Fish. 63: 89-101.
28. Suominen T. 1998. Järviruokokasvustojen muutokset Saaristomerellä. M.Sc. dissertation, Department of Geography, University of Turku.
29. Sutela T., Korhonen P. & Nyberg K. 2004. Stocking success of newly hatched pike evaluated by radioactive strontium (85Sr) marking. J. Fish Biol. 64: 653-664.
30. Urho L., Hildén M. & Hudd R. 1990. Fish reproduction and the impact of acidification in the Kyrönjoki River estuary in the Baltic Sea. Env. Biol. Fish. 27: 273-283.
31. Urho L. 1999. Relationship between dispersal of larvae and nursery areas in the Baltic Sea. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 56 (Supplement): 114-121.
32. Westin L. & Limburg K.E. 2002. Newly discovered reproductive isolation reveals sympatric populations of Esox lucius in the Baltic. J. Fish. Biol. 61: 1647-1652.