Effects of water quality and hydrologic drivers on periphyton colonization on Sparganium erectum in two Turkish lakes with different mixing regimes

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

Volumn 146, Issue 1-3, 2008, Pages 171-181

  Albay, Meriç ^a   Akçaalan, Reyhan ^a  

^a ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Biomonitoring; Manyas lake; Periphyton colonization; Sapanca lake; Sparganium erectum; Water quality

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; LAKES; MIXING; WATER LEVELS; WATER QUALITY;

BIOMONITORING; MANYAS LAKE; PERIPHYTON COLONIZATION; SAPANCA LAKE; SPARGANIUM ERECTUM;

LAKE POLLUTION;

CHLOROPHYLL A;

ANGIOSPERM; BIOMONITORING; COLONIZATION; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; LIGHT INTENSITY; MIXING; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PERIPHYTON; WATER QUALITY; WATER TEMPERATURE;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; EUTROPHICATION; HYDROLOGY; LAKE; LIGHT INTENSITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY; NUTRIENT SUPPLY; NUTRITIONAL DEFICIENCY; PERIPHYTON; PLANT STEM; RHIZOME; SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER; TROPHIC LEVEL; TURKEY (REPUBLIC); WATER QUALITY; WATER TEMPERATURE; ZONATION;

ANIMALS; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FRESH WATER; MARINE BIOLOGY; PHYTOPLANKTON; SPARGANUM; TURKEY; WATER MOVEMENTS;

BALIKESIR [TURKEY]; EURASIA; LAKE KUS; SAPANCA LAKE; TURKEY;

AULACOSEIRA ITALICA; CLADOPHORA GLOMERATA; CYLINDROCAPSA; FRAGILARIA ULNA; MELOSIRA VARIANS; MOUGEOTIA; NAVICULA TRIPUNCTATA; OEDOGONIUM; SPARGANIUM ERECTUM;

EID: 53649083770     PISSN: 01676369     EISSN: 15732959     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-007-0069-5     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ács, É., & Kiss, K. T. (1991). Investigation of periphytic algae in the Danube at Göd (1669 river km, Hungary). Algological Studies, 62, 47-67.
2. Ács, É., Kiss, K. T., Szabó, K., & Makk, J. (2000). Short-term colonization sequence of periphyton on glass slides in a large river (River Danube, near Budapest). Algological Studies, 100, 135-156.
3. Albay, M., & Akçaalan, R. (2003). Comparative study of periphyton colonisation on common reed (Phragmites australis) and artificial substrate in shallow lake, Manyas, Turkey. Hydrobiologia, 506-509, 531-540.
4. Albay, M., Akçaalan, R., Tüfekçi, H., Metcalf, J. S., Beattie, K. A., & Codd, G. A. (2003). Depth profiles of cyanobacterial hepatotoxins (microcystins) in three Turkish freshwater lakes. Hydrobiologia, 505, 89-95.
5. Balik, S. (1989). Determination of present state of Manyas Lake and Bird Paradise and look for the way of solution. Projet Number: 1987/050 139p (in Turkish).
6. Biggs, B. J. F. (1989). Biomonitoring of organic pollution using periphyton, South Branch, Canterbury, New Zealand. New-Zealand Journal Marine Freshwater Research, 23, 263-274.
7. Buczkó, K., & Ács, E. (1998). Comparison of succession of reed periphyton in a degraded and in an undisturbed part of shallow lake (Lake Velencei, Hungary, Central Europa). Verh Internat Verein Theor Ang Limnol, 26, 1674-1676.
8. Cardinale, B. J., Nelson, K., & Palmer, M. A. (2000). Linking species diversity to the functioning of ecosystems; on the importance of environmental context. Oixos, 91, 175-183.
9. Cattaneo, A. (1987). Periphyton in lakes of different Trophy. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 44, 296-303.
10. Cederwall, H., & Elmgren, R. (1990). Biological effects of eutrophication in the Baltic Sea, particularly in the coastal zone. Ambio, 19, 109-112.
11. Çelik, K. (2006). Spatial and seasonal variations in chlorophyll-nutrient relationships in the shallow hypertrophic Lake Manyas, Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 117 (1-3), 261-269.
12. Danilov, R. A., & Ekelund, N. G. A. (2001). Comparison of usefulness of three types of artificial substrata (glass, wood and plastic) when studying settlement patterns of periphyton in lakes of different trophic status. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 45, 167-170.
13. Erkakan, F. (1997). Manyas Lake watery areas administration plan project. Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Environment, General Directorate of Environmental Protection, Ankara. TUBITAK Project Number: 94K100010.
14. Flynn, N. J., Snook, D. L., Wade, A. J., & Jarvie, H. P. (2002). Macrophyte and periphyton dynamics in a UK Cretaceous chalk stream: The River Kennet, a tributary of the Thames. The Science of the Total Environment, 282-283, 143-157.
15. Gaiser, E. E., Scinto, L. J., Richards, J. H., Jayachandran, K., Childers, D. L., Trexler, J. C., et al. (2004). Phosphorus in periphyton mats provides the best metric for detecting low-depth P enrichment in an oligotrophic wetland. Water Research, 38, 507-516.
16. Hill, W. R., Ryon, M. G., & Schilling, E. M. (1995). Light limitation in a stream ecosystem: Response by primary producers and consumers. Ecology, 76, 1297-1309.
17. Kiss, M. K., Lakatos, G., Borics, G., Gido, Z., & Deak, C. (2003). Littoral macrophyte-periphyton complexes in two Hungarian shallow waters. Hydrobiologia, 506-509, 541-548.
18. Marker, A. F. H., & Collett, G. D. (1997). The spatial and temporal characteristics of algae in the River Great Ouse. II. The epiphytic algal flora. Regulated Rivers, 13, 235-244.
19. Meulemans, J. T. (1998). Seasonal changes in biomass and production of periphyton growing upon reed in Lake Maarsseveen I. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 112, 21-42.
20. 4- fertilization: Kuparuk River, Alaska (68°N Latitude). Hydrobiologia, 240, 103-119.
21. Müller, U. (1994). Seasonal development of epiphytic algae on Phragmites australis (CAV.) TRIN. Ex STEN. In a eutrophic lake. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 129 (3), 273-292.
22. Müller, U. (1996). Production rates of epiphytic algae in a eutrophic lake. Hydrobiologia, 330, 37-45.
23. Nusch, E. (1980). Comparison of different methods for chlorophyll and phaeopigment determination. Arch Hydrobiol Beih, 14, 14-36.
24. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (1982). Eutrophication of waters: Monitoring, assessment, and control. Technical Report, Environmental Directorate. OECD, Paris, France.
25. Pringle, C. M. (1990). Nutrient spatial heterogeneity: Effects on community structure, physiognomy, and diversity of stream algae. Ecology, 71, 905-920.
26. Rychkova, M. A. (1989). Role of water mass dynamics in formation of epiphyte algae communities in a lake. Hydrobiological Journal, 25 (3), 7-9.
27. Scheffer, M. (1998). Ecology of shallow lakes. p. 357. London: Chapman and Hall.
28. Sheldon, R. B., & Boylen, C. W. (1975). Factors affecting the contribution by epiphytic algae to the primary productivity of an oligotrophic freshwater lake. Applied Microbiology, 30 (4), 657-667.
29. Sommer, U. (1993). Disturbance-diversity relationship in two lakes of similar nutrient chemistry but contrasting disturbance regimes. Hydrobiologia, 249, 59-65.
30. Strand, J. A., & Weisner, S. E. B. (1996). Wave exposure related growth of epiphyton: Implications for the distribution of submerged macrophytes in eutrophic lakes. Hydrobiologia, 325 (2), 113-119.
31. Szabó, K., Ács, É., Pápista, É., Kiss, K. T., Barreto, S., & Makk, J. (2001). Periphyton and phytoplankton in the Soroksár-Danube in Hungary. I. Periphytic algae on reed stems. Acta Botanica Hungarica, 43 (1-2), 13-35.
32. ter Braak, C. J. F., & Smilauer, P. (2002). CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user's guide: Software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New York, USA.
33. Tuǧrul, S., & Morkoç, E. (1991). Determination of limnological characteristics of the Sapanca Lake. DOǦA, Tr. J. Engineering and Environmental Sciences, 15, 265-282.
34. Utermöhl, H. (1958). Zur Vervollkommung der quantitativen phytoplankton-methodik. Mitteil. Verh Internat Verein Theor Ang Limnol, 9, 39.
35. Vis, C., Hudon, C., Cattaneo, A., & Pinel-Alloul, B. (1998). Periphyton as an indicator of water quality in the St Lawrence River (Quebec, Canada). Environmental Pollution, 101, 13-24.
36. Wellnitz, T. A., & Ward, J. W. (1998). Does light intensity modify the effect mayfly grazers have on periphyton? Freshwater Biology, 39, 135-149.
37. Worm, B., Lotze, H. K., Boström, C., Engkvist, R., Labanauskas, V., & Sommer, U. (1999). Marine diversity shift link to interactions among grazers, nutrients and propagule banks. Marine Ecological Progress Series, 185, 309-314.