Participatory modeling of endangered wildlife systems: Simulating the sage-grouse and land use in Central Washington

Ecological Economics

Volumn 68, Issue 1-2, 2008, Pages 24-33

  Beall, Allyson ^a   Zeoli, Len ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Endangered species; Participatory modeling; Sage grouse; System dynamics; Wildlife modeling

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION PLANNING; DECISION MAKING; ENDANGERED SPECIES; ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FEDERAL SYSTEM; GAMEBIRD; HABITAT CONSERVATION; INTEGRATED APPROACH; LAND MANAGEMENT; LAND USE CHANGE; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; POPULATION DECLINE; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [UNITED STATES];

CENTROCERCUS UROPHASIANUS;

EID: 53649083548     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.08.019     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Akcakaya H.R., Burgman M.A., and Ginzburg L.R. Applied Population Ecology (1999) Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA
2. Beall A. Participatory Environmental Modeling and System Dynamics: Integrating Natural Resource Science and Social Concerns. PhD dissertation (2007), Washington State University, Pullman Washington
3. BenDor T., and Metcalf S. The spatial dynamics of invasive species spread. System Dynamics Review 22 No. 1 (2006) 27-50
4. Connelly J.W., Knick S.T., Schroeder M.A., and Stiver S.J. Conservation Assessment of Greater Sage-grouse and Sagebrush Habitats (2004), Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, Cheyenne, Wyoming
5. Costanza R., and Ruth M. Using dynamic modeling to scope environmental problems and build consensus. Environmental Management 22 No.2 (1998) 183-195
6. Costanza R., and Vionov A. Landscape Simulation Modeling (2004), Springer-Verlag, New York
7. Costanza R., Andrade F., Antunes P., van den Belt M., Boersma D., Boesch D.F., Catarino F., Hanna S., Limburg K., Low B., Molitor M., Pereira J.G., Rayner S., Santos R., Wilson J., and Young M. Principals for sustainable governance of the ocean. Science 281 5374 (1998) 198-199
8. Draft Douglas County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan, 2005. Foster Creek Conservation District Douglas County, Washington. United States Department of Agriculture, Waterville, Washington.
9. Dudek, B., 2006. Personal communication. Foster Creek Conservation District. Waterville Washington.
10. Farm Service Agency. Conservation Reserve Program (2006), US Department of Agriculture, Washington D.C.
11. Faust L., Jackson R., Ford A., Earnhardt J., and Thompson S.D. Models for management of wildlife populations: lessons form spectacled bears in zoos and grizzly bears in Yellowstone. System Dynamics Review 20 No. 2 (2004) 163-177
12. Feeney, H., 2004. BLM Sage-Grouse Interim Strategy Establishes Comprehensive Approach to Managing Sagebrush Habitat. Press release Nov. 16, 2004. US Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management, Washington DC.
13. Ford A. Modeling the Environment. An Introduction to System Dynamics Modelingof Environmental Systems (1999), Island Press, Washington D.C.
14. Forrester J.W. Industrial Dynamics (1961), Pegasus Communications, Waltham. MA
15. Forrester J.W. Urban Dynamics (1969), Pegasus Communications, Waltham. MA
16. Lacy R.C. Considering the threats to the viability of small populations using individual-based models. Ecological Bulletin 48 (2000) 39-51
17. Langpap L. Conservation of endangered species: can incentives work for private landowners?. Ecological Economics 57 (2006) 558-572
18. Langsdale, S. 2007. Participatory Model Building for Exploring Water Management and Climate Change Futures in the Okanagan Basin, British Columbia, Canada. Ph.D. Thesis. University of British Columbia.
19. Langsdale S., Beall A., Carmichael J., Cohen S., Forster C., and Neale T. Shared learning through group model building. Chapter 4. In: Cohen S., and Neale T. (Eds). Participatory Integrated Assessment of Water Management and Climate Change in the Okanagan Basin (2006), Vancouver: Environment Canada and University of British Columbia, British Columbia
20. Langsdale S., Beall A., Carmichael J., Cohen S., and Forster C. An exploration of water resources futures under climate change using system dynamics modeling. Integrated Assessment 7 (2007) No. 1
21. Meadows D., Meadows D., Randers J., and Behrens W. The Limits to Growth (1972), Universe Books, New York
22. Otto P., and Struben J. Gloucester Fishery: insights form a group modeling intervention. System Dynamics Review 20 No. 4 (2004) 287-312
23. Quigley, T.M. and Arbelbide, S.J., 1997. An assessment of ecosystem components in the interior Columbia River Basin and portions of the Klamath and Great Basins. Portland, Oregon: U. S. Dept of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, U.S. Dept of Interior, Bureau of Land Management. Report nr PNW-GTR-405.
24. Pederson E., and Grant W. Mediated Modeling (2004), Island Press, Washington, D.C. 187-204
25. Rich T., and Altman B. Under the sage-grouse umbrella. Bird Conservation 14 (2001) 10
26. Schroeder M.A. Unusually high reproductive effort by sage-grouse in a fragmented habitat in north-central Washington. Condor 99 (1997) 933-941
27. Schroeder, M.A., 2005. Personal Communication. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. Olympia, Washington.
28. Schroeder M.A., Young J.R., and Braun C.E. Sage-grouse. In: Poole A., and Gill F. (Eds). The Birds of North America (1999), Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology
29. Schroeder M.A., Hays D.W., Livingston M.F., Stream L.E., Jacobson J.E., and Pierce J. Changes in distribution and abundance of sage grouse in Washington. Northwestern Naturalist 81 No. 3 (2000) 104-112
30. Siemer W., and Otto P. A group model-building intervention to support wildlife management. Paper submitted to the 23rd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, July 17-21, 2005, Boston, USA (2005)
31. Stave K. Using system dynamics to improve public participation in environmental decisions. System Dynamics Review 18 No 2 (2002) 139-167
32. Sterman J.D. Business Dynamics - Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World (2000), McGraw-Hill, Boston
33. System dynamics review special edition. In: Sterman J.D. (Ed). The Global Citizen: Celebrating the Life of Dana Meadows vol. 18. No. 2 (2002) 100-310
34. Stinson D.W., Hays D.W., and Schroeder M.A. Washington State recovery plan for the greater sage-grouse. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington (2004)
35. Tidwell V.D., Passell H.D., Conrad S.H., and Thomas R.P. System dynamics modeling for community-based water planning: application to the Middle Rio Grande. Aquatic Science 66 (2004) 357-372
36. van den Belt M. Mediated Modeling (2004), Island Press, Washington, D.C.
37. Vennix J.A.M. Group Model Building. Facilitating Team Learning Using System Dynamics (1996), John Wiley and Sons, New York
38. Videira, N., 2005. Stakeholder Participation in Environmental Decision-Making: The Role of Participatory Modeling. PhD dissertation. Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia. Lisboa Portugal.
39. Videira N., van den Belt M., Antunes P., Santos R., and Gamito S. Decision support in coastal zone management in the Ria Formosa, Portugal. Mediated Modeling (2004), Island Press, Washington, D.C. 205-229
40. Videira, N., Antunes, P., Santos, R., Borrego, D., Lobo, G., . 2006 How and Why does Participatory Modelling support water policy processes? The Baixo Guadiana Experience. Paper submitted to the Ecological Economics Journal.
41. Wambolt, C.L., Harp, A.J., Welch, B.L., Shaw, N., Connelly, J.C., Reese, K.P., Braun, C.E., Klebenow, D.A., McAuthur, E.D., Thompson, J.G., Torell, L.A., and Tanaka, J.A., 2002. Conservation of Greater Sage-Grouse on Public Lands in the Western U.S.: Implications of Recovery and Management Policies. Caldwell, Idaho: Policy Analysis Center for Western Public Lands. Report nr PACWPL Policy Paper SG-02-02.
42. WDFW, 2005. Species of Concern. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington.