Scale invariance and similar invariance conditions for bankruptcy problems (Social Choice and Welfare DOI: 10.1007/s00355-008-0298-8);Scale invariance and similar invariance conditions for bankruptcy problems

Social Choice and Welfare

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 693-707

  Marchant, Thierry ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 53549126998     PISSN: 01761714     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00355-008-0328-6     Document Type: Erratum

References (12)

1. R Aumann M Maschler 1985 Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the talmud J Econ Theory 36 195 213
2. CP Chambers W Thomson 2002 Group order preservation and the proportional rule for the adjudication of conflicting claims Math Soc Sci 44 235 252
3. EJ Friedman 2004 Paths and consistency in additive cost sharing Int J Game Theory 32 501 518
4. Marchant T (2004) Rationing: dynamic considerations, equivalent sacrifice and links between the two approaches. Technical report, Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University
5. H Moulin 1987 Equal or proportional division of a surplus, and other methods Int J Game Theory 16 161 186
6. H Moulin 2000 Priority rules and other asymmetric rationing methods Econometrica 68 643 684
7. Moulin H (2002). Axiomatic cost and surplus sharing. In: Arrow, KJ, Sen, AK and Suzumura, K (eds) Handbook of social choice and welfare, pp. Elsevier, Amsterdam
8. B O'Neill 1982 A problem of rights arbitration from the talmud Math Soc Sci 2 345 371
9. Roemer JE (1996). Theories of distributive justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
10. W Thomson 2003 Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey Math Soc Sci 45 249 297
11. HP Young 1987 On dividing an amount according to individual claims or liabilities Math Oper Res 12 398 414
12. HP Young 1988 Distributive justice in taxation J Econ Theory 44 321 335