Public health and ethical considerations in planning for quarantine

Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine

Volumn 78, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 325-330

  Cetron, Martin ^a,c   Landwirth, Julius ^b  

^a Centers for Disease Control

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NATL CENTER FOR INFECTIOUS DISEASES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 53549116444     PISSN: 00440086     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Cetron M and Simone P. Battling 21st-century scourges with a 14th-century toolbox. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the internet]. 2004 Nov [cited Dec 27, 2005]. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol11/04-0797_12.htm.
2. HHS Pandemic Influenza Plan [monograph on the internet]. Washington: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2006. Available at http://www.hhs.gov/ pandemicflu/plan/
3. HHS Pandemic Influenza Plan, Appendix 4. Principles of Modern Quarantine [monograph on the Internet]. Washington: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2006. Available at http://www.hhs.gov/pandemicflu/plan/
4. Upshur R. The ethics of quarantine. AMA virtual mentor, Medicine and Society [serial on the internet]. Nov 2003, Vol 5 (No 11). Available at: www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/11535.html
5. Center for Law and the Public's Health at Georgetown and Johns Hopkins Universities. The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act. Prepared by the Center for Law and the Public's Health at Georgetown and Johns Hopkins Universities. Washington, DC; December 21, 2001. Available at http://www.publichealthlaw.net/MSEHPA/MSEHPA2.pdf www.publichealthlawnet/ msehpa2.pdf
6. Annas G. Bioterrorism, public health, and civil liberties. N Engl J Med 2002;346: 1337-42.
7. Mariner W. Bioterrorism Act: the wrong response. Natl Law J 2001;24:A20.
8. The Public Health Service Act. USC Title 42, Chapter 6A, Part G.
9. Executive Order; Amendment to E.O. 13295 Relating to Certain Influenza Viruses and Quarantinable Communicable Diseases; April 1, 2005. Available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/new/releases/2005/04/print/20050401-6.html
10. Public Health Leadership Society. Principles of the Ethical Practice of Public Health [monograph on the Internet]. Public Health Leadership Society, 2002. Available at www.phls.org/docs/PHLSethics brochure.pdf.
11. Smith CB, Battin MP, Jacobson JA, et al. Are there characteristics of infectious diseases that raise special ethical issues? Developing World Bioethics 2004;4:2-16
12. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Report of the CEJA: The Use of Quarantine and Isolation in Public Health Interventions. January, 2005. Report of the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. CEJA Report 1-1-05. Available at http://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/369/ceja_recs_1i05.pdf www.amaassn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/31/quarantine15726.pdf
13. Markovits D. Quarantines and distributive justice. J Law Med Ethics 2005;33:323-44.
14. Kass NE. An ethics framework for pubic health.Am J Public Health 2001;91:1776-82.
15. Upshur RE. Principles for the justification of public health intervention. Can J Public Health 2002;93:101-3.
16. World Health Organization. WHO Checklist for influenza preparedness planning [monograph on the Internet]. World Health Organization; 2005. Sec 1.5.2 Available at www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/influenza/FluCheck6web.pdf.
17. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Ontario Health Plan for an Influenza Pandemic [monograph on the internet]. 2005. Available at www.health.gov.on.ca/english/providers/program/emu/pan_flu_plan.html
18. University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics Pandemic Influenza Working Group. Stand On Guard for Thee. Ethical considerations in preparedness planning for pandemic influenza [monograph on the internet]. Toronto: University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics; 2005. Available at www.utoronto.ca/jcb/ home/documents/pandemic.pdf.