Radical prostatectomy for low risk carcinoma of the prostate

World Journal of Urology

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 443-446

  Smith Jr , Joseph A ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Robotic surgery

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; MALE; PROSTATE TUMOR; PROSTATECTOMY; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR;

HUMANS; MALE; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 53549111058     PISSN: 07244983     EISSN: 14338726     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-008-0293-9     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Barocas DA, Cowan JE, Smith Jr., JA, Carroll PR What percentage of patient with newly diagnosed carcinoma of the prostate are candidates for surveillance? An analysis the CaPSURE database. J Urol (in press)
2. Miller DC, Gruber SC, Hollenbeck BK, Montie JR, Wei JR (2006) Incidence of initial local therapy among men with lower risk prostate cancer in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1134-1141
3. Denberg TD, Melhado TV, Steiner JF (2006) Patient treatment preferences in localized prostate carcinoma: The influence of emotion, misconception, and anecdote. Cancer 107:620-630
4. Martin RM, Gunnell D, Hamdy F, Neal D, Lane A, Donovan J (2006) Continuing controversy over monitoring men with localized prostate cancer: A systematic review of programs in the prostate specific antigen era. J Urol 176:439-449
5. Klotz L (2005) Active surveillance for prostate cancer: For whom? J Clin Oncol 23:8165-8169
6. Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, Sandler HM et al (2008) Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate cancer survivors. N Engl J Med 358:1250-1261
7. Lepor H, Kaci L (2004) The impact of open radical retropubic prostatectomy on continence and lower urinary tract symptoms: A prospective assessment using validated self-administered outcome instruments. J Urol 171:1216-1219
8. Catalona WJ, Carvalhal GF, Mager DE, Smith DS (1999) Potency, continence, and complication rates in 1, 870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol 162:433-438
9. Smith JA Jr, Chan RC, Chang SS, Herrell SD, Clark PE, Baumgartner R, Cookson MS (2007) A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 178:2385-2389
10. Kaufman MR, Baumgartner RG, Anderson LW, Smith JA Jr, Chang SS, Herrell SD, Cookson MS (2007) The evidence-based pathway for peri-operative management of open and robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU 99:1103-1108
11. Farnham S, Webster TM, Herrell SD, Smith JA Jr (2006) Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements for robotic-assisted prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urol 67:360-363
12. Nelson B, Kaufman MR, Broughton G, Cookson MS, Chang SS, Herrell SD, Baumgartner RG, Smith JA Jr (2007) Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Urol 177:929-931
13. Rabbani R, Stapleton AMF, Kattan MW, Wheller TM, Scardino PT (2000) Factors predicting recovery of erections after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 164:1929-1934
14. Vickers AJ, Bianco FJ, Serio AM, Eastham JA et al (2007) The surgical learning curve for prostate cancer control after radical prostatectomy. JNCI 99:1171-1177
15. Saranchuk JW, Kattan MW, Elkin E, Touijer AK, Scardino PT, Eastham JA (2005) Achieving optimal outcomes after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 23:4146-4151
16. Webster TM, Herrell SD, Chang SS, Cookson MS, Baumgartner RG, Anderson LW, Smith JA Jr (2005) Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: A prospective assessment of postoperative pain. J Urol 174:912-914