The potential for additional carbon dioxide flooding projects in the United States

SPE - DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium Proceedings

Volumn 3, Issue , 2008, Pages 1304-1312

  Mohan, Hitesh ^a,b   Carolus, Marshall ^a,b   Biglarbigi, Khosrow ^a,b  

^a Shell International Exploration and Production

^b INTEK Inc

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 53549097391     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Annual Energy Outlook 2006. Energy Information Administration EIA/DOE, February 2006.
2. EIA Historical Data, http://www.eia.doe.gov
3. Comprehensive Oil and Gas Analysis Model (COGAM), NETL/DOE
4. Oil and Gas Journal, April 17, 2006.
5. Oil and Gas Journal, May 14, 2001.
6. INTEK Inc., http://www.inteki.com
7. Comprehensive Oil and Gas Analysis Model (COGAM), NETL/DOE.
8. NATCARB Website, http://www.natcarb.org.
9. INTEK Inc.
10. Renewable Fuels Association, http://www.ethanolrfa.org
11. INTEK Inc.
12. Pipeline Tariff Model, INTEK Inc.
13. INTEK Inc.
14. Dooley, J.J, et. al., Carbon Dioxide Capture and Geologic Storage, Global Energy Technology Strategy Program, April 2006.
15. Edited by Metz, Bert, Davidson, Ogunlade, et. al., Special Report on Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2005.
16. The Cost of Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage in Geological Formations, NETL/DOE, March 2005.
17. Dooley, J.J, et. al., Carbon Dioxide Capture and Geologic Storage, Global Energy Technology Strategy Program, April 2006.