Values for macular perimetry using the MP-1 microperimeter in normal subjects

Ophthalmic Research

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 9-13

  Shah, Vinay A ^a   Chalam, K V ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Microperimeter, MP 1; Normative data; Retinal sensitivity, age

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE FIXATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LIGHT EXPOSURE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERIMETER; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RACE DIFFERENCE; RETINA MACULA LUTEA; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ACOUSTIC MACULAE; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MACULA LUTEA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; PHOTOPHOBIA; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELDS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 53449095681     PISSN: 00303747     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000162111     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Midena E, Radin PP, Convento E, Cavarzeran F: Macular automatic fundus perimetry threshold versus standard perimetry threshold. Eur J Ophthalmol 2007;17:63-68.
2. Rohrschneider K, Becker M, Schumacher N, Fendrich T, Volcker HE: Normal values for fundus perimetry with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Am J Ophthalmol 1998;126:52-58.
3. Acosta F, Lashkari K, Reynaud X, Jalkh AE, Van de Velde F, Chedid N: Characterization of functional changes in macular holes and cysts. Ophthalmology 1991;98:1820-1823.
4. Mori F, Ishiko S, Kitaya N, et al: Use of scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimetry in clinically significant macular edema in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2002;46:650-655.
5. Rohrschneider K, Bultmann S, Gluck R, Kruse FE, Fendrich T, Volcker HE: Scanning laser ophthalmoscope fundus perimetry before and after laser photocoagulation for clinically significant diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:27-32.
6. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J: Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. Arch Ophthalmol 1987;105:1544-1549.
7. Shah VA, Chalam KV: Congenital retinal macrovessel causes reduced retinal sensitivity at the macula. Eur J Ophthalmol 2004;14:341-344.
8. Shah VA, Chalam KV: Liquid crystal display microperimetry in idiopathic subretinal fibrosis. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2004;35:321-324.
9. Springer C, Bultmann S, Volcker HE, Rohrschneider K: Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry. Ophthalmology 2005;112:848-854.
10. Rohrschneider K, Springer C, Bultmann S, Volcker HE: Microperimetry - comparison between the micro perimeter 1 and scanning laser ophthalmoscope - fundus perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;139:125-134.
11. Vujosevic S, Midena E, Pilotto E, Radin PP, Chiesa L, Cavarzeran F: Diabetic macular edema: correlation between microperimetry and optical coherence tomography findings. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:3044-3051.
12. Chalam KV, Shah VA: Liquid crystal display microperimetry in eyes with reduced visual acuity from macular pathology. Indian J Ophthalmol 2004;52:293-296.
13. Chalam KV, Agarwal S, Gupta SK, Shah GY: Recovery of retinal sensitivity after transient branch retinal artery occlusion. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2007;38:328-329.
14. Lachenmayr BJ, Kojetinsky S, Ostermaier N, Angstwurm K, Vivell PM, Schaumberger M: The different effects of aging on normal sensitivity in flicker and light-sense perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994;35:2741-2748.
15. Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Lewis RA: Evidence for a neural basis of age-related visual field loss in normal observers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1989;30:2056-2064.