The state children health insurance program (SCHIP) and prepregnancy coverage of teenage mothers

Medical Care

Volumn 46, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1071-1078

  Adams, E Kathleen ^a   Gavin, Norma I ^b   Ayadi, M Femi ^c   Colley Gilbert, Brenda ^d   Raskind Hood, Cheryl ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON CLEAR LAKE   (United States)

^d NATIONAL CENTER FOR CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION   (United States)

Author keywords

Insurance; Medicaid; SCHIP; Teen pregnancy

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT PREGNANCY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEDICAID; NORMAL HUMAN; PREPREGNANCY CARE; STATE CHILDREN HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM; ADULT; AGE; CHILD HEALTH CARE; ECONOMICS; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; INSURANCE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; POVERTY; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL SECURITY; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT HEALTH SERVICES; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AID TO FAMILIES WITH DEPENDENT CHILDREN; ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; INSURANCE COVERAGE; MEDICAID; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; POVERTY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY IN ADOLESCENCE; PRENATAL CARE; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATE HEALTH PLANS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 53449091679     PISSN: 00257079     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31818888de     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Maynard RA, ed. Kids Having Kids: Economic Costs and Social Consequences of Teen Pregnancy. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press; 1997.
2. Leigh WA. National costs of teen pregnancy and teen pregnancy prevention, what we know. Washington, DC: Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies; 2003. Available at: http://www.jointcenter.org
3. Leigh WA. State/local costs of teen pregnancy and teen pregnancy prevention, what we know. Washington, DC: Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies; 2003. Available at: http://www.jointcenter.org.
4. Fraser AM, Brockert JE, Ward RH. Association of young maternal age with adverse reproductive outcomes. Natl Engl J Med. 1995;332:1113-1117.
5. DuPlessis HM, Bell R, Richards T. Adolescent pregnancy: understanding the impact of age and race on outcomes. J Adolesct Health. 1997;20:187-197.
6. Wolfe B, Perozek M. Teen children's health and health care use. In: Maynard RA, ed. Kids Having Kids: Economic Costs and Social Consequences of Teen Pregnancy. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press; 1997:181-204.
7. Lewis CT, Mathews TJ, Heuser RL. Prenatal care in the United States, 1980-94. Vital Health Stat. 1996;21:1-17.
8. Egerter S, Braveman P, Marchi K. Timing of insurance coverage and use of prenatal care among low-income women.Am J Public Health. 2002;92:423-427.
9. Kost K, Landry D, Darroch JE. Predicting maternal behaviors during pregnancy: does intention status matter? Fam Plann Perspect. 1998;30: 79-88.
10. Sable MR, Stockbauer JW, Schramm WF, et al. Differentiating the barriers to adequate prenatal care in Missouri, 1987-88. Public Health Rep. 1990;105:549-555.
11. McComb Hulsey T. Association between early prenatal care and mother's intention of and desire for the pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol and Neonatal Nurs. 2001;30:275-282.
12. Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI). Teen Pregnancy: Trends and Lessons Learned. New York, NY: AGI; 2002. Issues in Brief, Series No. 1.
13. Santelli JS, Abma J, Ventura S, et al. Can changes in sexual behaviors among high school students explain the decline in teen pregnancy rates in the 1990s? J Adolesc Health. 2004;35:80-90.
14. Finer LB, Henshaw SK. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006; 38:90-96.
15. Kenney GM, Ullman FC, Weil A. Three Years into SCHIP: What States Are and Are not Spending. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; 2000. Urban Institute Series: New Federalism: Issues and Options for States. No. A-44:1-7.
16. DuBay L, Hill I, Kenney GM. Five Things Everyone ShouldKnow About SCHIP. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; 2002. Urban Institute Series: New Federalism: Issues and Options for States. No. A-55:1-4.
17. Rosenbaum S, Markus A, Sonosky C. Public health insurance design for children: the evolution from Medicaid to SCHIP. Health and Biomed Law. 2004;19:1-47.
18. Wolfe B, Scrivner S. The devil may be in the details; how the characteristics of SCHIP programs affect take-up. Policy Anal Manage. 2005;24:499 -522.
19. Kronebusch K, Elbel B. Simplifying children's Medicaid and SCHIP. Health Aff(Millwood). 2004;23:233-246.
20. Bansak C, Raphael S. The effects of state policy design features on take-up and crowd-out rates for the State Children's Health Insurance Program. Policy Anal Manage. 2006;26:141-175.
21. Grogger J, Karoly LA, Klerman JA. Consequences of Welfare Reform: A Research Synthesis. Prepared for the Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2002. DRU-2676-DHHS.
22. Chavkin W, Romero D, Wise PH. State welfare reform policies and declines in health insurance. Am Public Health. 2000;90:900-908.
23. Kaestner R, Kaushal N. Welfare reform and health insurance coverage of low-income families. J Health Econ. 2003;22:959-981.
24. Adams EK, Gavin NI, Manning W, et al. Welfare reform, insurance coverage pre-pregnancy and timely enrollment: an eight-state study. Inquiry. 2005;42:129-44.
25. Lopoo LM. Maternal employment and teenage childbearing: evidence from the PSID. J Policy Anal Manage. 2005;24:23-46.
26. Kaestner R, Korenman S, O'Neill J. Has welfare reform changed teenage behaviors? J Policy Anal Manage. 2003;22:225-248.
27. Ketsche P, Adams EK, Minyard K, et al. The stigma of public programs: does a separate S-CHIP program reduce it? J Policy Anal Manage. 2007;26:775-789.
28. Gilbert BC, Shulman HB, Fischer LA, et al. The pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system (PRAMS): methods and 1996 response rates from 11 states. Matern Child Health J. 1999;3:199-209.
29. Lipscomb LE, Johnson CH, Morrow B, et al. PRAMS surveillance report, pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
30. Adams EK, Gavin NI, Handler A, et al. Transition in insurance coverage from before pregnancy through delivery in nine states, 1996 -1999. Health Aff (Millwood). 2003;22:219-229.
31. Norton EC, Wang H, Ai C. Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models. Stata Journal. 2004;4:103-116.
32. Kriss JL, Collins SR, Mahato B, et al. Rite of passage? Why young adults become uninsured and how new policies can help, 2008 update. The Commonwealth Fund. Issue Brief. 2008;38:1-24.
33. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ. Births: Preliminary Data for 2006. National Vital Statistics Reports; Vol 56, No 7. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2007.
34. Gold RB, Sonfield A. Reproductive health services for adolescents under the state children's health insurance program. Fam Plan Perspectives. 2001;33:81-87.
35. Adams EK, Gavin NI, Kuo TM, et al. Changes in the use of preventive, family planning and contraceptive care among Medicaid-covered teens in Florida and Georgia from 1994-1995 to 2000-2001. Final Report submitted to Centers for Disease Control under contract number 200-2002-00776 TO 27; 2008.
36. Ayadi MF, Kuo TM, Adams EK, et al. Contraceptive use among Medicaid-covered teens and the risk of teen conception: Changes from 1994/95 to 2000/01. Final Report submitted to Centers for DiseaseControl under contract number 200-2002-00776 TO 27; 2008.