Long-term follow-up of retinitis pigmentosa patients with multifocal electroretinography

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 49, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 4664-4671

  Nagy, Ditta ^a,d   Schönfisch, Birgitt ^b   Zrenner, Eberhart ^a   Jägle, Herbert ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^c Centre for Ophthalmology   (Germany)

^d NONE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE COURSE; DISEASE DURATION; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GANZFIELD ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; HUMAN; LONG TERM CARE; MALE; MULTIFOCAL ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; NIGHT VISION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RETINA CONE; RETINA ROD; RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA; RETINOGRAPHY; SCHOOL CHILD; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; VISUAL STIMULATION; COLOR VISION DEFECT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DARK ADAPTATION; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERIMETRY; PHOTORECEPTOR; PHYSIOLOGY; VISUAL DISORDER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHILD; COLOR VISION DEFECTS; DARK ADAPTATION; DISEASE PROGRESSION; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; PHOTORECEPTORS, VERTEBRATE; RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 53449087759     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.07-1360     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Seeliger M, Kretschmann U, Apfelstedt-Sylla E, Ruther K, Zrenner E. Multifocal electroretinography in retinitis pigmentosa (published correction in Am J Ophthalmol. 1998 May;125(5):743). Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125(2):214-226.
2. Herse P. Retinitis pigmentosa: visual function and multidisciplinary management. Clin Exp Optom. 2005;88(5):335-350.
3. Pagon RA. Retinitis pigmentosa; major review. Surv Ophthalmol. 1988;33(3):137-177.
4. Fishman GA, Birch DG, Holder GE, Brigell MG. Electrophysiologic Testing in Disorders of the Retina, Optic Nerve and Visual Pathway. 2nd ed. San Francisco: The Foundation of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, 2001:10-11.
5. Marmor MF, Holder GE, Seeliger MW, Yamamoto S. International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision. Standard for clinical electroretinography (2004 update). Doc Ophthalmol. 2004;108(2):107-114.
6. Hood DC, Odel JG, Chen CS, Winn BJ. The multifocal electroretinogram. J Neuroophthalmol. 2003;23(3):225-235.
7. Sutter EE, Tran D. The field topography of ERG components in man. I. The photopic luminance response. Vision Res. 1992;32(3):433-446.
8. Hood DC, Bach M, Brigell M, et al. ISCEV guidelines for clinical multifocal electroretinography (2007 edition). Doc Ophthalmol. 2008;116(1):1-11.
9. Lindborn B. Cartographic deformations in a parabolic visual field map. Acta Ophthalmol. 1988:66:718-720.
10. Weleber RG, Tobler WR. Computerized quantitative analysis of kinetic visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986;101:461-468.
11. Kirkham TH, Meyer E Visual field area on the Goldmann hemispheric perimeter surface Correction of cartographic errors inherent in perimetry. Curr Eye Res. 1981;1(2):93-99.
12. Bowman KJ. A method for quantitative scoring of the Farnsworth Panel D-15. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1982;60:907-916.
13. Geller AM. A table of color distance scores for quantitative scoring of the Lanthony Desaturate color vision test. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2001;23(3):265-267.
14. Vingrys AJ, King-Smith PE. A quantitative scoring technique for panel tests of color vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988;29(1):50-63.
15. Lanthony P. Evaluation of the desaturated Panel D-15. I. Method of quantification and normal scores (in French). J Fr Ophtalmol. 1986;9(12):843-847. (Pubitemid 17043696)
16. Iannaccone A, Kritchevsky SB, Ciccarelli ML, et al. Kinetics of visual field loss in Usher Syndrome type II. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(3):784-792. (Pubitemid 38868371)
17. Chan HL, Brown B. Investigation of retinitis pigmentosa using the multifocal electroretinogram. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1998;18(4):335-350. (Pubitemid 28351837)
18. Seeliger MW, Zrenner E, Apfelstedt-Sylla E, Jaissle GB. Identification of Usher syndrome subtypes by ERG implicit time. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(12):3066-3071. (Pubitemid 33035310)
19. Massof RW, Dagnelie G, Benzschawel T, Palmer RW, Finkelstein D. First-order dynamics of visual field loss in retinitis pigmentosa. Clin Vis Sci. 1990;5:1-26. (Pubitemid 20075821)
20. Holopigian K, Greenstein V, Seiple W, Carr R. Rates of change differ among measures of visual function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:398-405. (Pubitemid 26085894)
21. Berson EL, Sandberg MA, Rosner B, Birch DG, Hanson AH. Natural course of retinitis pigmentosa over a three-year interval. Am J Ophthalmol. 1985;99:240-251. (Pubitemid 15143427)
22. Grover S, Fishman GA, Anderson RJ, Alexander KR, Derlacki DJ. Rate of visual field loss in retinitis pigmentosa. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:460-465. (Pubitemid 27120301)
23. Birch DG, Anderson JL, Fish GE. Yearly rates of rod and cone functional loss in retinitis pigmentosa and cone-rod dystrophy. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(2):258-268.
24. Granse L, Ponjavic V, Andreasson S. Full-field ERG, multifocal ERG and multifocal VEP in patients with retinitis pigmentosa and residual central visual fields. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2004;82(6):701-706. (Pubitemid 40063519)
25. Sandberg MA, Weigel-DiFranco C, Rosner B, Berson EL. The relationship between visual field size and electroretinogram amplitude in retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37(8):1693-1698. (Pubitemid 26271421)
26. Iannaccone A, Rispoli E, Vingolo EM, et al. Correlation between Goldmann perimetry and maximal electroretinogram response in retinitis pigmentosa. Doc Ophthalmol. 1995;90(2):129-142.
27. Massof RW, Wu L, Finkelstein D, Perry C, Starr SJ, Johnson MA. Properties of electroretinographic intensity-response functions in retinitis pigmentosa. Doc Ophthalmol. 1984;57(3):279-296. (Pubitemid 14029323)
28. Fahle M, Steuhl KP, Aulhorn E. Correlations between electroretinography, morphology and function in retinitis pigmentosa. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1991;229(1):37-49.
29. Heckenlively JR. RP cone-rod degeneration. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1987;85:438-470.
30. Birch DG, Herman WK, deFaller JM, Disbrow DT, Birch EE. The relationship between rod perimetric thresholds and full-field rod ERGs in retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1987;28:954-965.
31. Seiple W, Clemens CJ, Greenstein VC, Carr RE, Holopigian K. Test-retest reliability of the multifocal electroretinogram and Humphrey visual fields in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Doc Ophthalmol. 2004;109(3):255-272. (Pubitemid 41349058)
32. Bock M, Andrassi M, Belitsky L, Lorenz B. A comparison of two multifocal ERG systems. Doc Ophthalmol. 1998-1999;97(2):157-178. (Pubitemid 30005393)
33. Marmor FM. Do you, doctor, take the mfERG. . . for better or for worse (editorial)? Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002;240:241-243.
34. Rudolph G, Kalpadakis P. The role of fixation for reliable mfERG results (letter to the editor). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002;240:874-875. (Pubitemid 36075646)