Maximum angle of stability in wet and dry spherical granular media

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 56, Issue 6, 1997, Pages R6271-R6274

  Albert, Réka ^a   Albert, István ^a   Hornbaker, Daniel ^a   Schiffer, Peter ^a   Barabási, Albert László ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 5344277528     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.56.R6271     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. H. M. Jaeger and S. R. Nagel, Science 255, 1523 (1992).SCIEAS
2. R. L. Brown and J. C. Richards, Principles of Powder Mechanics (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1970).
3. H. M. Jaeger, C. H. Liu, and S. R. Nagel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 40 (1988).PRLTAO
4. P. Evesque, D. Fargeix, P. Habib, M. P. Luong, and P. Porion, Phys. Rev. E 47, 2326 (1993); PLEEE8
5. P. Evesque, Phys. Rev. A 43, 2720 (1991).PLRAAN
6. E. F. Wolf and H. L. von Hohenleiten, Trans. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. 67, 585 (1945);
7. N. Standish et al., Powder Technol. 68, 187 (1991); POTEBXN. Pilpel, Manuf. Chemist Aerosol News, 41, 19 (1970);
8. R. T. Fowler and F. A. Wyatt, Aust. J. Chem. Eng. 1, 5 (1960);
9. A. Czirók, E. Somfai, and T. Vicsek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2154 (1993); PRLTAO
10. Physica A 205, 355 (1994).PHYADX
11. J. Lee and H. J. Hermann, J. Phys. A 26, 373 (1993).JPHAC5
12. G. H. Ristow, Europhys. Lett. 34, 263 (1996).EULEEJ
13. S. Schwarzer, Phys. Rev. E 52, 6461 (1995).PLEEE8
14. A similar idea has been also suggested by D. Train, J. Pharm. Pharm. 10, 127T (1958).
15. F. Cantelaube, Y. Limon-Duparcmeur, D. Bideau, and G. H. Ristow, J. Phys. (France) I 5, 581 (1995).
16. S. R. Nagel, Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 321 (1992).RMPHAT
17. J. N. Israelachvili, Intermolecular and Surface Forces (Academic Press, London, 1989).
18. D. Hornbaker et al., Nature (London) 387, 765 (1997).NATUAS
19. V. Eremenko, Y. Naidich, and I. Lavrimenko, Liquid Phase Sintering (Consultants Bureau, New York, 1970).
20. For wet granular media the difference between (Formula presented) and (Formula presented) is expected to be smaller than for the dry case, since the cohesive forces reduce the effect of bead inertia, and limit avalanche size. Consequently we can fit the theoretical (Formula presented) to the experimental measurement of (Formula presented)
21. K. M. Hill and J. Kakalios, Phys. Rev. E 49, R3610 (1994).PLEEE8
22. find that (Formula presented) varies significantly with the method of measurement. We take the mean of their quoted values.