Using a Values Discussion Guide to facilitate communication in advance care planning

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 22-31

  Karel, Michele J ^a   Powell, Jean ^b   Cantor, Michael D ^c  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

^c Geriatric Res Educ Clin Ctr   (United States)

Author keywords

Advance care planning; Patient surrogate communication; Values

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIENCE; FAMILY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; OUTPATIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS;

EMPIRICAL APPROACH; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;

ADVANCE CARE PLANNING; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO DEATH; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BOSTON; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COMMUNICATION; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEEDBACK; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; VETERANS;

EID: 5344265341     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00246-5     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Covinsky K.E., Fuller J.D., Yaffe K., et al. Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patients: findings of the SUPPORT project. J. Am. Geriatrics Soc. 48:2000;S187-S193
2. Miles S.H., Koepp R., Weber E.P. Advance end-of-life treatment planning: a research review. Arch. Intern. Med. 156:1996;1062-1068
3. Teno J., Lynn J., Wenger N., et al. Advance directives for seriously ill hospitalized patients: effectiveness with the Patient Self-Determination Act and the SUPPORT intervention. J. Am. Geriatrics Soc. 45:1997;500-507
4. Aitken P.V. Incorporating advance care planning into family practice. Am. Family Physician. 59:1999;605-612
5. Emanuel L.L., Danis M., Pearlman R.A., Singer P.A. Advance care planning as a process: structuring the discussions in practice. J. Am. Geriatrics Soc. 43:1995;440-446
6. Hammes B.J., Rooney B.L. Death and end-of-life planning in one midwestern community. Arch. Intern. Med. 158:1998;383-390
7. Lane A., Dubler N.N. The health care agent: selected but neglected. Bioethics Forum. 13:1997;17-21
8. Quill T.E. Initiating end-of-life discussions with seriously ill patients. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 284:2000;2502-2507
9. Singer P.A., Martin D.K., Lavery J.V., Theil E.C., Kelner M., Mendelssohn D.C. Reconceptualizing advance care planning from the patient's perspective. Arch. Intern. Med. 158:1998;879-884
10. Hare J., Pratt C., Nelson C. Agreement between patients and their self-selected surrogates on difficult medical decisions. Arch. Intern. Med. 52:1992;1049-1054
11. Seckler A.B., Meier D.E., Mulvihill M., Cammer Paris B.E. Substituted judgment: how accurate are proxy decisions? Ann. Intern. Med. 115:1991;92-98
12. Suhl J., Simons P., Reedy T., Garrick T. Myth of substituted judgment: surrogate decision making regarding life support is unreliable. Arch. Intern. Med. 154:1994;90-96
13. Uhlmann R.F., Pearlman R.A., Cain K.C. Physicians' and spouses' predictions of elderly patients resuscitation preferences. J. Gerontol. 43:1988;M115-M121
14. Zweibel N.R., Cassel C.K. Treatment choices at the end of life: a comparison of decisions by older patients and their physician-selected proxies. Gerontologist. 29:1989;615-621
15. Collopy B.J. The moral underpinning of the proxy-provider relationship: issues of trust and distrust. J. Law Med. Ethics. 27:1999;37-45
16. Fins J.J. Commentary: from contract to covenant in advance care planning. J. Law Med. Ethics. 27:1999;46-51
17. Puchalski C.M., Zhong Z., Jacobs M.M., et al. Patients who want their family and physician to make resuscitation decisions for them: observations from SUPPORT and HELP. J. Am. Geriatrics Soc. 48:2000;S84-S90
18. Rosenfeld K.E., Wenger N.S., Kagawa-Singer M. End-of-life decision making: a qualitative study of elderly individuals. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 15:2000;620-625
19. Schwartz C.E., Wheeler B., Hammes B., et al. Early intervention in planning end-of-life care with ambulatory geriatric patients. Arch. Intern. Med. 162:2002;1611-1618
20. Doukas D.J., McCullough L.B. The values history: the evaluation of the patient's values and advance directives. J. Family Pract. 32:1991;145-153
21. Gibson JM. National values history project. Generations 1990;(Suppl):51-64.
22. Karel M.J. The assessment of values in medical decision making. J. Aging Stud. 14:2000;403-422
23. Pearlman R.A., Cole W.G., Patrick K.L., Starks H.E., Kain K.C. Advance care planning: eliciting patient preferences for life-sustaining treatment. Patient Educ. Counsel. 26:1995;353-361
24. Pearlman R, Starks H, Cain K, Rosengreen D, Patrick D. Your life, your choices - planning for future medical decisions: how to prepare a personalized living will. Springfield, VA: US Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service; 1998.
25. Folstein M.F., Folstein S.E., McHugh P.R. Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J. Psychiatric Res. 12:1975;189-198
26. Patton MQ. How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Newbury Park: Sage; 1987.
27. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994.
28. Strauss AL, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage; 1990.
29. Merrick E. An exploration of quality in qualitative research: are "reliability" and "validity" relevant? In: Kopala M, Suzuki LA, editors. Using qualitative methods in psychology. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1999. p. 25-36.
30. Ditto P.H., Danks J.H., Smucker W.D., et al. Advance directives as acts of communication. Arch. Intern. Med. 161:2001;421-430
31. Hill CE, O'Brien KM. Helping skills: facilitating exploration, insight, and action. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1999.
32. Larson D.G., Tobin D.R. End-of-life conversations: evolving practice and theory. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 284:2000;1573-1578
33. Ersek M., Kagawa-Singer M., Barnes D., Blackhall L., Koenig B.A. Multicultural considerations in the use of advance directives. ONF. 25:1998;1683-1690
34. High D.M. All in the family: extended autonomy and expectations in surrogate health care decision-making. Gerontologist. 28:1988;46-51
35. Blackhall L.J., Murphy S.T., Frank G., Michel V., Azen S. Ethnicity and attitudes toward patient autonomy. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 274:1995;820-825
36. Emanuel L.L., Emanuel E.J. The medical directive: a new comprehensive advance care document. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 261:1989;3288-3293