Adaptive recreation planning and climate change: A contingent visitation approach

Ecological Economics

Volumn 50, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 83-99

  Richardson, Robert B ^a   Loomis, John B ^b  

^a Centre for Rainforest Studies   (Australia)

^b Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change; Contingent behavior; National parks; Recreation

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; NATIONAL PARK; RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT;

COLORADO; NORTH AMERICA; ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK; UNITED STATES;

EID: 5344259014     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.010     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bailey K.D. Methods of Social Research. 1994;The Free Press, New York NY
2. Blomquist G., Berger M., Hoehn J. New estimates of the quality of life in urban areas. Am. Econ. Rev. 78(1):1988;89-107
3. Casella G., Berger R.L. Statistical Inference. 1990;Brooks/Cole Publishing, Pacific Grove, CA
4. Cato, J., Gibbs, K., 1973. An Economic Analysis Regarding the Effects of Weather Forecasts on Florida Coastal Recreationists, Economics Report No. 50. Gainesville, FL: Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida.
5. Chase L., Lee D., Schulze W., Anderson D. Ecotourism Demand and Differential Pricing of National Park Access in Costa Rica. Land Econ. 74(4):1998;466-482
6. Chow G.C. Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica. 28(3):1960;591-605
7. Cline W. The Economics of Global Warming. 1992;Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC
8. Fankhauser S., Smith J.B., Tol R.S.J. Weathering climate change: some simple rules to guide adaptation decisions. Ecol. Econ. 30(1):1999;67-78
9. Greene W.H. Econometric Analysis. 1999;Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River NJ
10. Grijalva T.C., Berrens R.P., Bohara A.K., Shaw W.D. Testing the validity of contingent behavior trip responses. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 84(2):2002;401-414
11. Loomis J.B. An investigation into the reliability of intended visitation behavior. Environ. Resour. Econ. 3:1993;183-191
12. Loomis J.B., Crespi J. Estimated effects of climate change on selected outdoor recreation activities in the United States. Mendelsohn R., Neumann J.E. The Impact of Climate Change on the United States Economy. 1999;289-314 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
13. Loomis J., González-Cabán A., Englin J. Testing for differential effects of forest fires on hiking and mountain biking demand and benefits. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 26(2):2001;508-522
14. Madison D. The amenity value of the climate: the household production approach. Resour. Energy Econ. 25(2):2003;155-175
15. Mendenhall W., Wackerly D.D., Scheaffer R.L. Mathematical Statistics with Applications. 1990;PWS-KENT Publishing, Boston, MA
16. MIG (Minnesota IMPLAN Group), 1997. IMPLAN Professional. Stillwater, MN.
17. Mood A.M., Graybill F.A., Boes D.C. Introduction to the Theory of Statistics. 3rd edition:1974;McGraw-Hill, New York
18. Whitehead J.C., Haab T.C., Huang J. Measuring recreation benefits of quality improvements with revealed and stated behavior data. Resour. Energy Econ. 22:2000;339-354