Metal-on-metal versus metal-on-polyethylene bearings in total hip arthroplasty: A matched case-control study

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 19, Issue 7 SUPPL., 2004, Pages 35-41

  Naudie, Douglas ^a   Roeder, Christopher P ^b   Parvizi, Javad ^c   Berry, Daniel J ^d   Eggli, Stefan ^b   Busato, Andre ^c  

^a LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^c ROTHMAN INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

bearing surfaces; case control study; metal; polyethylene; total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

METAL; POLYETHYLENE;

AGED; ARTHRITIS; AUTOMATION; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; FOLLOW UP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP DYSPLASIA; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; METALS; POLYETHYLENE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 5344237410     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.06.020     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. McKee G.K., Watson-Farrar J. Replacement of arthritic hips by the McKee-Farrar prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 48:1966;245
2. Ring P.A. Complete replacement arthroplasty of the hip by the Ring prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 50:1968;720
3. Muller M.E. Total hip prostheses. Clin Orthop. 72:1970;46
4. Charnley J. Total hip replacement by low friction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 72:1970;7
5. Willert H.G., Bertram H., Buchorn G.H. Osteolysis in alloarthroplasty of the hip the role of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear particles. Clin Orthop. 258:1990;95
6. Muller M.E. The benefits of metal-on-metal total hip replacements. Clin Orthop. 311:1995;54
7. Amstutz H.C., Grigoris P. Metal on metal bearings in hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 329:1996;S11
8. Schmalzried T.P., Peters P.C., Maurer B.T., et al. Long-duration metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties with low wear of the articulating surfaces. J Arthroplasty. 11:1996;322
9. McKellop H., Park S.H., Chiesa R., et al. In vivo wear of three types of metal on metal hip prostheses during two decades of use. Clin Orthop. 329:1996;S128
10. Jacobsson S., Djerf K., Wahlstrom O. 20-year results of McKee-Farrar versus Charnley prosthesis. Clin Orthop. 329:1996;S60
11. Brown S.R., Davies W.A., DeHeer D.H., Swanson A.B. Long-term survival of McKee-Farrar total hip prostheses. Clin Orthop. 402:2002;157
12. Chan F.W., Bobyn J.D., Medley J.B., et al. The Otto Aufranc Award Wear and lubrication of metal-on-metal hip implants. Clin Orthop. 369:1999;10
13. MacDonald S.J., McCalden R.W., Chess D.G., et al. The John Charnley Award: Metal-on-metal versus polyethylene in hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop. 406:2003;282
14. Weber B.G. Experience with the Metasul total hip bearing system. Clin Orthop. 329:1996;S67
15. Randle R., Gordiev K. Metal-on-metal articulation in total hip arthroplasty preliminary results in 57 cases. Aust N Z J Surg. 67:1997;634
16. Wagner M., Wagner H. Medium-term results of a modern metal-on-metal system in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop. 379:2000;123
17. Dorr L.D., Wan Z., Longjohn D.B., et al. Total hip arthroplasty with use of the Metasul metal-on-metal articulation four- to seven-year results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 82:2000;789
18. Korovessis P., Petsinis G., Repanti M. Zweymueller with metal-on-metal articulation clinical, radiological and histological analysis of short-term results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 123:2003;5
19. Kocher M.S., Zurakowski D. Clinical epidemiology and biostatistics a primer for orthopaedic surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 86:2004;607
20. Patterson D. The International Documentation and Evaluation System (IDES). Orthopedics. 16:1993;11
21. Roeder C., Eggli S., Aebi M., Busato A. The validity of clinical examination in the diagnosis of loosening of components in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 85:2003;37
22. Muller U., Gauthier E., Roeder C., Busato A. The relationship between cup design and the radiological signs of aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 85:2003;31
23. Johnston R.C., Fitzgerald R.H., Harris W.H., et al. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement A standard system of terminology and reporting results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 72:1990;161
24. Smith S.L., Dowson D., Goldsmith A.A. The effect of femoral head diameter upon lubrication and wear of metal-on-metal total hip replacements. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]. 215:2001;161
25. Brand R.A., Pederson D.R., Yoder S.A. How definition of loosening affects the incidence of loose total hip reconstructions. Clin Orthop. 210:1985;185
26. Aspenberg P., van der Vis H. Fluid pressure may cause periprosthetic osteolysis particles are not the only thing. Acta Orthop Scand. 69:1998;1
27. Komistek R.D., Dennis D.A., Ochoa J.A., et al. In vivo comparison of hip separation after metal-on-metal or metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 84:2002;1836