NETSIM-based approach to evaluation of bus preemption strategies

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1554, 1997, Pages 80-89

  Khasnabis, Snehamay ^a   Karnati, Rajashekar R ^a   Rudraraju, Rama K ^a  

^a Wayne State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 5344220298     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Casey, R. F., et al. Advanced Public Transportation Systems: The State of the Art. Report DOT-VNTSC-UMTA-91-2. U.S. Department of Transportation, 1991.
2. Davies, P., C. Hill, N. Emmott, and J. Siviter. Assessment of Advanced Technologies for Transit and Rideshare Applications. Final Report NCTRP Project 60-1 A. Castle Rock Consultants; NCTRP, National Research Council, Washington. D.C., 1991, 130 pp.
3. Khasnabis, S., G. V. Reddy, and S. K. Hoda. Evaluation of the Operating Cost Consequences of Signal Preemption as an IVHS Strategy. In Transportation Research Record 1390, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 3-9.
4. Cisco, B. A., and S. Khasnabis. A Comparative Analysis of Two Methods to Assess Operational Consequences of Bus Preemption. Proc., Fifth Annual Meeting of ITS America, 1995, pp. 505-515.
5. TRAF User Reference Guide Version 4.0. Report FHWA-A-RD-92-060. FHWA, S.S. Department of Transportation, April 1993.
6. Yedlin, M., E. Lieberman, A. Phlegar, A. Kanaan, and A. J. Santiago, et al. The New TRAF-NETSIM: Version 4.0. Presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1994.
7. Benekohal, R. F., and G. Abu-Lebdeh. Variability Analysis of Traffic Simulation Outputs: Practical Approach for TRAF-NETSIM. Presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1994.
8. Maki, R. E., and D. R. Branch. Signal Timing Optimization and Evaluation: Route M-53 (Van Dyke), Macomb County. In Special Report 194: The Application of Traffic Simulation Models. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1981, pp. 80-83.
9. Schafer, B. F. Comparison of Alternative Traffic Control Strategies at a T-Intersection. In Special Report 194: The Application of Traffic Simulation Models. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1981, pp. 87-89.
10. Bruce, E. L., and J. E. Hummer. Delay Alleviated by Left-Turn Bypass Lanes. In Transportation Research Record 1299, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 1-8.
11. Yauch, P. J., et al. Using NETSIM to Evaluate the Effects of Draw-bridge Operations on Adjacent Signalized Intersections. ITE Journal, Vol. 58, No. 5, May 1988, pp. 35-39.
12. Luedtke, P., et al. Simulating DART's North Central Light Rail Line Using TRAF-NETSIM. Presented at ITE International Meeting, The Hague, Netherlands, Sept. 1993.
13. Rathi, A. K., and E. B. Lieberman. Effectiveness of Traffic Restraint for a Congested Urban Network: A Simulation Study. In Transportation Research Record 1232, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1989, pp. 95-102.
14. Papacostas, C. S., and M. Wiley. Use of TRAF-NETSIM to Estimate the Traffic Impacts of an Urban Resort Area Development. In Microcomputers in Transportation (J. Chow ed.), ASCE, New York, 1992.
15. Nemeth, Z. A., and J. R. Mekemson. Comparison of SOAP and NETSIM: Pretimed and Actuated Signal Controls. In Transportation Research Record 905, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1983, pp. 84-89.
16. Sadegh, A., and A. E. Radwan. Comparative Assessment of 1985 HCM Delay Model. Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 114, No. 2, March 1988, pp. 194-208.
17. Kim, Y., and C. J. Messer. Traffic Signal Timing Models for Oversaturated Signalized Interchanges. Research Report 1148-2. Texas Transportation Institute, Jan. 1992.
18. Rathi, A. K., and A. J. Santiago. Identical Traffic Stream in the TRAF-NETSIM Simulation Program. Traffic Engineering, Vol. 114, No. 2, March 1988, pp. 194-208.
19. Chang, G. L., and A. Kanaan. Variability Assessment for TRAF-NETSIM. Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 116, No. 5, Sept./Oct. 1990, pp. 636-657.
20. Rathi, A. K., and Z. A. Nemeth. An Application of Variance Reduction Techniques in Freeway Simulation. Transportation Research B, Vol. 19, No. 3, 1985, pp. 209-216.
21. Yedlin, M., and E. B. Lieberman. Analytic and Simulation Studies of Factors That Influence Bus-Signal-Priority Strategies. In Transportation Research Record 798, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1981, pp. 26-29.
22. Smith. Evaluation of Control Strategies for Bus Preemption of Traffic Signals. Final Report. Report FHWA-NJ-RD-85-003. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1985, p. 53.
23. Khasnabis, S., R. R. Karnati, and R. K. Rudraraju. Ann Arbor Signal Preemption Study. Wayne State University; Michigan Department of Transportation and University of Michigan, April 1996.