Notions and subnotions in information structure

Acta Linguistica Hungarica

Volumn 55, Issue 3-4, 2008, Pages 381-395

  Gussenhoven, Carlos ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Contrastive focus; Corrective focus; Focus ambiguity; Focus meaning; Focus type; Informational focus

Indexed keywords

EID: 53349171352     PISSN: 12168076     EISSN: 15882624     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1556/ALing.55.2008.3-4.11     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. D. Bolinger 1983 Affirmation and default Folia Linguistica 17 505 533
2. C. Cotter 1996 Systems in contact: Focus in Irish and English Belfast Working Papers in Language and Linguistics 12 85 116
3. Dik, Simon C. Maria E. Hoffmann Jan R. de Jong Sie Ing Djlang Harry Stroomer Lourens de Vries 1980. On the typology of focus phenomena. In: Teun Hoekstra Harry van der Hulst Michael Moortgat (eds): Perspectives on functional grammar, 4174. Foris, Dordrecht.
4. Kiss Katalin 1998 Identificational focus versus information focus Language 74 245 273
5. Elordieta, Gorka 2007a. A constraint-based analysis of the intonational realization of focus in Northern Bizkaian Basque. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin & New York.
6. Elordieta, Gorka 2007b. Constraints on intonational prominence of focalized constituents. In: Lee et al. (2007, 122).
7. G. Elordieta J. I. Hualde 2003 Tonal and durational correlates of accent in contexts of downstep in Lekeitio Basque Journal of the International Phonetic Association 33 195 209
8. Fry, Caroline 1993. German intonational patterns. Niemeyer, Tbingen.
9. Frota, Snia 1998. Prosody and focus in European Portuguese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Lisbon. Published by Garland, New York, 2000.
10. C. Gussenhoven 1983 Focus, mode, and the nucleus Journal of Linguistics 19 377 417
11. Gussenhoven, Carlos 1984. On the grammar and semantics of sentence accents. Foris, Dordrecht.
12. Gussenhoven, Carlos 2004. The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. Gussenhoven, Carlos 2007. Types of focus in English. In: Lee et al. (2007, 83101).
14. Gussenhoven, Carlos Renske Teeuw 2007. A moraic and a syllabic H-tone in Yucatec Maya. In: Z. Esther Herrera Pedro Martin Butrageo (eds): Fonologa instrumental: Patrones fnicos y variacin, 4971. El Colegio de Mxico, Mexico City.
15. Hanssen, Judith Jrg Peters Carlos Gussenhoven 2008. Prosodic effects of focus in Dutch declaratives. In: Plinio A. Barbosa Sandra Madureira Csar Reis (eds): Speech Prosody 2008 Conference, 609612. Editora RG/CNPq, Campinas, Brazil.
16. Heuven, Vincent J. van 1994. What is the smallest prosodic domain? In: Patricia A. Keating (ed.): Phonological structure and phonetic form: Papers in Laboratory Phonology III, 7698. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
17. Kanerva, Jonni 1990. Focus and phrasing in Chichea phonology. Garland, New York.
18. Kubozono, Harno 1993. The organization of Japanese prosody. Kurosio, Tokyo.
19. Kuno, Susumu 1973. The structure of the Japanese language. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
20. Kgler, Frank Stavros Skopeteas 2006. Interaction of lexical tone and information structure in Yucatec Maya. In: Agns Belotel-Greni Michel Greni (eds): Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages (TAL-2), 380388. Universit de La Rochelle, La Rochelle.
21. Ladd, D. Robert 1980. The structure of intonational meaning: Evidence from English. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
22. Ladd, Robert 1996. Intonational phonology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
23. Lee, Chungmin Matthew Gordon Daniel Bring (eds) 2007. Topic and focus: Cross-linguistic perspectives on meaning and intonation (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 82). Springer, Dordrecht.
24. F. Mller-Gotama 1996 Topic and focus in Sundanese Anthropological Linguistics 38 117 132
25. Pierrehumbert, Jane Mary E. Beckman 1988. Japanese tone structure (Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 15). MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
26. A. Rialland S. Robert 2001 The intonational system of Wolof Linguistics 39 893 939
27. Robert, Stphanie 1991. Une approche nonciative du systme verbal: le cas de wolof. CNRS, Paris.
28. Robert, Stphanie 2000. Le verbe wolof ou la grammaticalisation du focus. In: Bernard Caron (ed.): Topicalisation et focalisation dans les langues africaines, 229267. Peeters, Louvain/Paris.
29. C. Rudin T. H. King R. Izvorski 1998 Focus in Bulgarian and Russian yes-no questions University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 21 209 226
30. B. Russell 1905 On denoting Mind 14 479 493
31. Schmerling, Susan F. 1974. Aspects of English sentence stress. Texas University Press, Austin.
32. Sugahara, Mariko 2002. Conditions on post-FOCUS dephrasing in Tokyo Japanese. In: Bernard Bel Isabel Marlin (eds): Speech Prosody 2002. Proceedings of the First International Speech Prosody Conference, 6558. Laboratoire Parole et Langage, CNRS and Universit de Provence, Aix-en-Provence.
33. Truckenbrodt, Hubert 1995. Phonological phrasestheir relation to syntax, focus, and prominence. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.