IR-UV double resonance spectroscopic investigation of phenylacetylene- alcohol complexes. Alkyl group induced hydrogen bond switching

Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Volumn 112, Issue 23, 2008, Pages 5121-5125

  Singh, Prashant Chandra ^a   Patwari, G Naresh ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BOMBAY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETYLENE; AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS; BENZENE; BINDING SITES; CARRIER CONCENTRATION; COMPLEXATION; ELECTRON DENSITY MEASUREMENT; ELECTRONS; ETHANOL; HYDROGEN; HYDROGEN BONDS; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; LIGHTING; METHANOL; MONOMERS; OPTICAL SENSORS; RESONANCE;

ALKYL GROUPS; BENZENE RINGS; DOUBLE RESONANCES; ELECTRON DENSITIES; ELECTRONIC TRANSITIONS; FERMI RESONANCE BANDS; HYDROGEN ATOMS; HYDROGEN BOND ACCEPTOR; HYDROGEN BONDINGS; INTERMOLECULAR STRUCTURES; METHANOL COMPLEXES; OH GROUPS; PARTIAL CHARGES; PHENYL ACETYLENE; STRETCHING REGION; SUBSTITUTED BENZENES; TRIFLUOROETHANOL; TRIPLE BONDS;

ORGANIC POLYMERS;

EID: 53349160631     PISSN: 10895639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp800968g     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Singh, P. C.; Bandopadhyay, B.; Patwari, G. N. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, in press.
2. (a) Engdahl, A.; Nelander, B. J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89, 2860.
3. (b) Wanna, J.; Menapace, J. A.; Bernstein, E. R. J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 85, 1795.
4. (C) Suzuki, S.; Green, P. G.; Bumgarner, R. E.; Dasgupta, S.; Goddard, W. A., in; Blake, G. A. Science 1992, 257, 942.
5. (d) Pribble, R. N.; Garrett, A. W.; Haber, K.; Zwier, T. S. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 531.
6. (e) Gutowsky, H. S.; Emilsson, T.; Arunan, E. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 99, 4883.
7. (a) Engdahl, A.; Nelander, B. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1983, 100 (129), 2860.
8. (b) Peterson, K. I.; Klemperer, W. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 81, 3842.
9. Singh, P. C.; Patwari, G. N. Curr. Sci. Submitted for publication, 2008
10. (a) Page, R. H.; Shen, Y. R.; Lee, Y. T. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 88, 4621.
11. (b) Pribble, R. N.; Zwier, T. S. Science 1994, 265, 75.
12. (c) Riehn, C.; Lahmann, C.; Wassermann, B.; Brutschy, B. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1992, 197, 443.
13. (d) Tanabe, S.; Ebata, T.; Fujii, M.; Mikami, N. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1993, 215, 347.
14. (e) Fujii, A.; Patwari, G. N.; Ebata, T.; Mikami, N. Int. J. Mass. Spectrom. 2002, 220, 289.
15. Dao, P.-D.; Morgan, S.; Castleman, A. W., Jr. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1984, 111, 38.
16. Pimentel, G. C.; McClellan, A. L. The Hydrogen Bond; Freeman: San Francisco, 1960.
17. Kalasinsky, V. F.; Anjarla, H. V. J. Phys. Chem. 1980, 84, 1940.
18. Pribble, R. N.; Hagemeister, F. C.; Zwier, T. S. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 107, 10717.
19. Stearns, J. A.; Zwier, T. S. J. Phys. Chem. A 1997, 106, 2145.
20. Siglow, K.; Neusser, H. J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2001, 343, 474.
21. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K. N.; Burant, J. C.; Millam, J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.; Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Klene, M.; Li, X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian, H. P.; Cross, J. B.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Ayala, P. Y.; Morokuma, K.; Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A. G.; Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 03, revision A.1; Gaussian: Wallingford, CT, 2003.
22. 100% of BSSE correction often underestimates the interaction energy, and 50% correction is a good empirical approximation. See Kim, S. K.; Tarakeshwar, P.; Lee, J. Y. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 4145.
23. Arunan, E. Indian Institute of Science, Private communication, 2007.
24. (a) Tarakeshwar, P.; Kim, K. S.; Brutschy, B. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 8501.
25. (b) Buchhold, K.; Reimann, B.; Djafari, S.; Barth, H. D.; Brutschy, B.; Tarakeshwar, P.; Kim, K. S. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 112, 1844.
26. Watanabe, T.; Ebata, T.; Tanabe, S.; Mikami, N. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 105, 408.
27. Matsuda, Y.; Ebata, T.; Mikami, N. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 8397.
28. It is well known that Mulliken charges are not adequate to explain the bonding in various situations; therefore charges from the NPA were calculated. See Reed, A. E.; Weinstock, R. B.; Weinhold, F. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 83, 735.