Reducing the distance: Equity issues in distance learning in public education

Journal of Science Education and Technology

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 285-295

  Campbell, Patricia B ^a   Storo, Jennifer ^b  

^a Campbell Kibler Associates   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Disability; Distance learning; Educational equity; Gender; Race

Indexed keywords

EID: 53349141234     PISSN: 10590145     EISSN: 15731839     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF01677125     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Anderson, B., Bailey, S., Campbell, P. B., Clewell, B. C., and Sjostrom, L., The Bush Initiative in Mathematics and Science: A Report to the Foundation. Wellesley, Massachusetts, Center for Research on Women, Wellesley College.
2. African National Congress (1994). A Policy Framework for Education and Training. Capetown, South Africa: Education Department, African National Congress, January.
3. Bailey, S., Burbidge, L., Campbell, P. B., Jackson, B., Marx, F., and McIntosh, P. The AAUW Report: How Schools Shortchange Girls. Washington, DC: AAUW Educational Foundation & NEA.
4. Bajtelsmit, J. (1990). Study Methods in Distance Education: A summary of Five Research Studies. In Moore, M. G. (Ed.), Contemporary Issues in American Distance Education Pergamon Press, New York, pp. 181-191.
5. Baker, D. (1986). Sex Differences in Classroom Interactions in Secondary Science. Journal of Classroom Interaction 22, 212-218.
6. Banks, J. (1989). Integrating the Curriculum with Ethnic Content: Approaches and Guidelines. In Banks, J., and Banks, C. (Eds.), Multicultural Education: Issues and Perspectives, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, Massachusetts, pp. 192-207.
7. Barrera, A. (1993). Distance Learning: The Challenge for a Multicultural Society. Occasional Papers in Bilingual Education. (ERIC Microfiche number ED 364-102).
8. Becker, H. J. (1983-1984). School Uses of Microcomputers: Reports from a National Survey, Numbers 1-6. (Baltimore, Maryland, Center for Social Organization of Schools, Johns Hopkins University).
9. Campbell, P. B., and Acerbo, K. (1994). Connecting the Past with the Future: Interim Evaluation Report. (Groton, Massachusetts, Campbell-Kibler Associations).
10. Campbell, P. B., and Acerbo, K. (1994). EUREKA! SAT Preparation Program 1994 Evaluation Report. (Groton, Massachusetts: Campbell-Kibler Associations).
11. Campbell, P. B., Cumba, A., and Kibler, T. R. (1984). Computers in Bilingual Classes: Effects of Sex and Language Dominance. A paper presented to the 10th Annual Research on Women in Education Conference, Long Beach, California (November).
12. Campbel, P. B., and Storo, J. (1996). Why Me? Why My Classroom? The Need for Equity in Coed Math and Science Classrooms. (Newton, Maryland: WEEAP Publishing Center).
13. Campion, M. G. (1991). Distance Education: Access, Equity and Participation and/or Efficiency and Effectiveness. ASPESA Australian and South Pacific External Studies Association. (June), pp. 59-70. (ERIC Microfiche # ED 338-226).
14. Chambers, J. Studio coordinator; Louisiana SERC. Personal communication (July).
15. Clark, W. B., and Haughey, M. (1990). Evaluation of Year One of Distance Learning Project North. (February, 1990). ERIC Microfiche No. ED 325-098.
16. College Board. Equity 2000: What It Takes. (New York: The College Board, No date). Corporation for Public Broadcasting (1993).
17. Corporation for Public Broadcasting. (1994). Lifelines of Learning. Corporation for Public Broadcasting, Washington DC.
18. Gibson, C. C. (1990). Learners and Learning: A Discussion of Selected Research. In Moore, M. G. (Ed.), Contemporary Issues in American Distance Education. Pergamon Press, New York, pp. 121-135.
19. Gragner, D. (1990). Bridging Distances to the Individual Learner. In Moore, M. G. (Ed.), Contemporary Issues in American Distance Education, Pergamon Press, New York, pp. 121-135.
20. Graumann, P. J. (1994a). Are We Almost There Yet? The Road to the Information Superhighway. Technology and Learning (March), pp. 28-30, 32, 34.
21. Graumann, P. J. (1994b). Galaxy Classroom: Television for Tomorrow. Technology and Learning, 14:7, (April), pp. 34-36, 38.
22. Hanley, J. (1994). State Distance Learning Coordinator; Louisiana, Personal communication (July).
23. Hipsman, I. (1994). Network Facilities Marketing Manager. Personal communication (July).
24. Irvine, J. (1986). Teacher Student Interactions: Effects of Student Race, Sex and Grade Level. Journal of Educational Psychology 78: 14-21.
25. Kahle, J. Retention of Girls in Science: Case Studies of Secondary Teachers. In Kahle, J. (Ed.). Women in science, Palmer Press, Philadelphia.
26. Kelly, J. (1976). The Social Relations of the Sexes: Methodological Implications of Women's History. Signs 1, pp. 809-823.
27. Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Women's Place. Harper and Row, New York.
28. MCET (1994). Fall Program Guide. Mass Learnpike. Cambridge Massachusetts, MCET
29. McIntosh, P. (1983). Interactive Phases of Curricular RE-Vision. A Feminist Perspective. Working Paper 124. Center for Research on Women, Wellesley College, Wellesley, Massachusetts.
30. National Center for Educational Statistics. (1991). Trends in Academic Progress. U.S. Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.
31. National Coalition of Educational Equity Advocates. Educate America. Mid-Atlantic Center for Educational Equity, No date. Silver Spring, Maryland.
32. National Science Foundation. (1993). Indicators of Science and Mathematics Education - 1992. National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.
33. Olugbemiro, J. (1993). Distance Education Research Priorities for Australia: A Study of the Opinions of Distance Educators and Practitioners. (ERIC Microfiche: ED 360-475 (July).
34. Sanders. J., and Stone, A. (1986). The Neuter Computer Neal-Schulman, New York.
35. Secada, W. (1989). Educational Equity Versus Equality of Education: An Alternative Conception. In Secada, W. (Ed.), Equity in Education. The Falmer Press, New York, pp. 68-88.
36. Tobin, K., and Garnet, P. (1987). Gender Related Differences in Science Activities. Science Education 71: 91-103.
37. Tushnet, N. C., Manuel, van Broekhuizen, D., Millsap, D., and Millsap, M. A. (1993). STAR Schools Evaluation Report One. Southwest Regional Laboratory, Los Alamitos, California.
38. Tushnet, N. C., Manuel, D. M., Chase, A., Garnette, C., and Katzenmeyer, C. The STAR Schools Distance-Learning Program: Results from the Mandated Study. A presentation to the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, Louisiana (April).
39. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Research. (1993). Educational Reforms and Students at Risk. A Review of the Current State of the Art.
40. Viadero, D. (1994). Two Firms Join Council to Link Urban Schools to Learning Network. Education Week. p. 9.
41. Wilson, B. Students' Assessment of Distance Learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, New Orleans, Louisiana, November, 1990.
42. Yrchick, J. (1993). A Survey of Telecommunications Equipment in Public Schools. National Education Association, Washington DC.