Inclusion: Considerations from social validity and functional outcome analysis

Journal of Behavioral Education

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 283-291

  Little, Steven G ^a   Witek, Jennifer M ^a  

^a NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Functional outcome analysis; Inclusion; Mainstreaming; Regular education initiative; Social validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 53349128090     PISSN: 10530819     EISSN: 15733513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02110131     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Abt Associates Inc. (1977). Education as experimentation: A planned variation model (Vol. IV-A). Cambridge, MA: Author.
2. Antia, S. D., Kreimeyer, K. H., & Eldredge, N. (1993). Promoting social interaction between young children with hearing impairments and their peers. Exceptional Children, 60, 262-275.
3. Baer, D. M., & Bushell, D. (1981). The future of behavior analysis in the schools? Consider its recent past, and then ask a different question. School Psychology Review, 10, 259-270.
4. Brinker, R., & Thorpe, M. (1984). Integration of severely handicapped students and the proportion of IEP objectives obtained. Exceptional Children, 51, 168-175.
5. Calhoun, G., & Elliott, R. (1977). Self-concept and academic achievement of educable retarded and emotionally disturbed pupils. Exceptional Children, 43, 256-306.
6. Carlberg, C., & Kavale, K. (1980). The efficacy of special versus regular class placement for exceptional children: A meta-analysis. Journal of Special Education, 14, 295-309.
7. Chambers, S. M., & Kay, R. W. (1992). Research on social integration: What are the problems? International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 39, 47-59.
8. Fox, L. (1989). Peer acceptance of learning disabled children in the regular classroom. Exceptional Children, 56, 50-59.
9. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (1994). Inclusive schools movement and the radicalization of special education reform. Exceptional Children, 60, 294-309.
10. Gresham, F. M. (1989). Assessment of treatment integrity in school consultation and prereferral intervention. School Psychology Review, 18, 37-50.
11. Gresham, F. M., & Noell, G. H. (1993). Methods for documenting the effectiveness of consultation: A critical analysis. In J. E. Zins, T. R. Kratochwill, & S. N. Elliott (Eds.), Handbook of consultation services for children: Application in educational and clinical settings (pp. 249-273). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12. Illinois School Psychologists Association (1994). Manual for best practices on inclusion. Bloomingdale, IL: Author.
13. Jenkins, J. R., Jewell, M., Leicester, N., O'Connor, R. E., Jenkins, L. M., & Troutner, N. M. (1994). Accommodations for individual differences without classroom ability groups: An experiment in school restructuring. Exceptional Children, 60, 344-358.
14. Kavale, K. A. (1981). Functions of the Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities (ITPA): Are they trainable? Exceptional Children, 47, 496-510.
15. Kavale, K. A., & Dobbins, D. A. (1993). The equivocal nature of special education interventions. Early Childhood Development and Care, 86, 23-37.
16. Kavale, K. A., & Mattson, P. D. (1983). "One jumped off the balance beam": Meta-analysis of perceptual-motor training. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16, 165-173.
17. Noell, G. H., & Gresham, F. M. (1993). Functional outcome analysis: Do the benefits of consultation and prereferral intervention justify the costs? School Psychology Quarterly, 8, 200-226.
18. Reimers, T M., Wacker, D. P., & Koeppl, G. (1987). Acceptability of behavioral interventions: A review of the literature. School Psychology Review, 16, 212-227.
19. Reynolds, M. C. (1989). An historical perspective: The delivery of special education to mildly disabled and at-risk students. Remedial and Special Education, 10, 7-11.
20. Schattman, R., & Benay, J. (1992). Inclusive practices transform special education in the 1990s. School Administrator, 49, 8-12.
21. Schneider, B. H., & Leroux, J. (1994). Educational environments for the pupil with behavioral disorders: A "best evidence" synthesis. Behavioral Disorders, 19, 192-204.
22. Turnbull, A. P. (1982). Preschool mainstreaming: A policy and implementation analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4, 281-291.
23. U.S. Department of Commerce (1994). Statistical abstract of the United States, 1994 (114th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
24. Wagner, M. (1994). Testimony before House Subcommittee on Select Education and Civil Rights. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
25. Wang, M., & Baker, E. (1986). Mainstreaming programs: Design features and effects. Journal of Special Education, 19, 503-521.
26. Wang, M. C., Reynolds, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (1988). Integrating the children of the second system. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 248-251.
27. Will, M. C. (1986). Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility. Exceptional Children, 52, 411-415.
28. Witt, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom management strategies. In T R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Advances in school psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 251-288). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203-214.
30. Yell, M. L. (1995). Least restrictive environment, inclusion, and students with disabilities: A legal analysis. The Journal of Special Education, 28, 389-404.
31. York, J., Doyle, M. B., & Kronberg, R. (1992). A curriculum development process for inclusive classrooms. Focus on Exceptional Children, 25, 1-16.