Decreased resistance and increased tolerance to native herbivores of the invasive plant Sapium sebiferum

Ecography

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 663-671

  Zou, Jianwen ^a,b   Siemann, Evan ^a   Rogers, William E ^a,c   DeWalt, Saara J ^a,d  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NANJING AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; BIOASSAY; DICOTYLEDON; HERBIVORE; INVASIVE SPECIES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEED;

COLEOPTERA; SAPIUM; TRIADICA SEBIFERA;

EID: 53349121602     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.05540.x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Agrawal, A. A. 1998. Induced responses to herbivory and increased plant performance Science 279: 1201 1202.
2. Agrawal, A. A. et al. 2004. Evolution of plant resistance and tolerance to frost damage Ecol. Lett. 7: 1199 1208.
3. Bastlová, D. Květ, J. 2002. Differences in dry weight partitioning and flowering phenology between native and non-native plants of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L.) Flora 197: 332 340.
4. Blossey, B. Nötzold, R. 1995. Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis J. Ecol. 83: 887 889.
5. Bossdorf, O. et al. 2004. Palatability and tolerance to simulated herbivory in native and introduced populations of Alliaria petiolata (Brassicaceae) Am. J. Bot. 91: 856 862.
6. Bossdorf, O. et al. 2005. Phenotypic and genetic differentiation in native versus introduced plant populations Oecologia 144: 1 11.
7. Bruce, K. A. et al. 1997. Introduction, impact on native habitats, and management of a woody invader, the Chinese tallow tree, Sapium sebiferum (L.) Roxb Nat. Areas J. 17: 255 260.
8. Buschmann, H. et al. 2005. Variation in growth pattern and response to slug damage among native and invasive provenances of four perennial Brassicaceae species J. Ecol. 93: 322 334.
9. Cameron, G. N. Spencer, S. R. 1989. Rapid leaf decay and nutrient release in a Chinese tallow forest Oecologia 80: 222 228.
10. Crawley, M. J. 1987. What makes a community invasible? Gray, A. J. Colonization, succession and stability. Blackwell 429 453.
11. Daehler, C. C. Strong, D. R. 1997. Reduced herbivore resistance in introduced smooth cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora) after a century of herbivore-free growth Oecologia 110: 99 108.
12. DeWalt, S. J. et al. 2006. Microsatellite markers for an invasive tetraploid tree, Chinese tallow (Triadica sebifera) Mol. Ecol. Not. 6: 505 507.
13. Elton, C. S. 1958. The ecology of invasion by animals and plants. Chapman and Hall.
14. Erfmeier, A. Bruelheide, H. 2005. Invasive and native Rhododendron ponticum populations: is there evidence for genotypic differences in germination and growth? Ecography 28: 417 428.
15. Fineblum, W. L. Rausher, M. D. 1995. Trade-off between resistance and tolerance to herbivore damage in a morning glory Nature 377: 517 520.
16. Franks, S. J. et al. 2008. No evolution of increased competitive ability or decreased allocation to defense in Melaleuca quinuenervia since release from natural enemies Biol. Invasions 10: 455 466.
17. García, L. V. 2004. Escaping the Bonferroni iron claw in ecological studies Oikos 105: 657 663.
18. Grotkopp, E. et al. 2002. Toward a causal explanation of plant invasiveness: seedling growth and life-history strategies of 29 pine (Pinus) species Am. Nat. 159: 396 419.
19. Güsewell, S. et al. 2006. Native and introduced populations of Solidago gigantea differ in shoot production but not in leaf traits or litter decomposition Funct. Ecol. 20: 575 584.
20. Hawkes, C. V. 2007. Are invaders moving targets? The generality and persistence of advantages in size, reproduction, and enemy release in invasive plant species with time since introduction Am. Nat. 170: 832 843.
21. Joshi, J. Vrieling, K. 2005. The enemy release and EICA hypothesis revisited: incorporating the fundamental difference between specialist and generalist herbivores Ecol. Lett. 8: 704 714.
22. Jubinsky, G. 1994. A review of the literature. Chinese tallow (Sapium sebiferum) Florida Dept of Environment Protection, Bureau of Aquatic Plant Manage, Technical Service Section, TSS-93-03.
23. Juenger, T. Lennartsson, T. 2000. Tolerance in plant ecology and evolution: toward a more unified theory of plant-herbivore interaction Evol. Ecol. 14: 283 287.
24. Leger, E. A. Forister, M. L. 2005. Increased resistance to generalist herbivores in invasive populations of the California poppy (Eschscholzia californica) Divers. Distrib. 11: 311 317.
25. Mack, R. N. et al. 2000. Biotic invasion: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control Ecol. Appl. 10: 689 710.
26. Meyer, G. et al. 2005. An experimental test of the evolution of increased competitive ability hypothesis in goldenrod, Solidago gigantea Oecologia 144: 299 307.
27. Mooney, H. A. Cleland, E. E. 2001. The evolutionary impact of invasive species Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 5446 5451.
28. Müller, C. Martens, N. 2005. Testing predictions of the 'evolution of increased competitive ability' hypothesis for an invasive crucifer Evol. Ecol. 19: 533 550.
29. Müller-Schärer, H. Steinger, T. 2004. Predicting evolutionary change in invasive, exotic plants and its consequences for plant-herbivore interactions Ehler, L. E. Genetics, evolution and biological control. CABI 137 162.
30. Müller-Schärer, H. et al. 2004. Evolution in invasive plants: implications for biological control Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 418 422.
31. Rogers, W. E. Siemann, E. 2004. Invasive ecotypes tolerate herbivory more effectively than native ecotypes of the Chinese tallow tree Sapium sebiferum J. Appl. Ecol. 41: 561 570.
32. Rogers, W. E. Siemann, E. 2005. Herbivory tolerance and compensatory differences in native and invasive ecotypes of Chinese tallow tree (Sapium sebiferum) Plant Ecol. 181: 57 68.
33. Rosenthal, J. P. Kotanen, P. M. 1994. Terrestrial plant tolerance to herbivory Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 145 148.
34. Siemann, E. Rogers, W. E. 2001. Genetic differences in growth of an invasive tree species Ecol. Lett. 4: 514 518.
35. Siemann, E. Rogers, W. E. 2003a. Reduced resistance of invasive varieties of the alien tree Sapium sebiferum to a generalist herbivore Oecologia 135: 451 457.
36. Siemann, E. Rogers, W. E. 2003b. Increased competitive ability of an invasive tree may be limited by an invasive beetle Ecol. Appl. 13: 1503 1507.
37. Siemann, E. et al. 2006. Rapid adaptation of insect herbivores to an invasive plant Proc. R. Soc. B 273: 2763 2769.
38. Stastny, M. et al. 2005. Do vigour of introduced populations and escape from specialist herbivores contribute to invasiveness? J. Ecol. 93: 27 37.
39. Stowe, K. A. et al. 2000. The evolutionary ecology of tolerance to consumer damage Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31: 565 595.
40. Strauss, S. Agrawal, A. 1999. The ecology and evolution of tolerance to herbivory Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 179 185.
41. Thompson, J. N. 1998. Rapid evolution as an ecological process Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 329 332.
42. Tiffin, P. 2000. Are tolerance, avoidance, and antibiosis evolutionarily and ecologically equivalent responses of plants to herbivores? Am. Nat. 155: 128 138.
43. Tiffin, P. Rausher, M. 1999. Genetic constraints and selection acting on tolerance to herbivory in the common morning glory, Ipomoea purpurea Am. Nat. 154: 700 716.
44. Tiffin, P. Inouye, B. D. 2000. Measuring tolerance to herbivory: accuracy and precision of estimates made using natural versus imposed damage Evolution 54: 1024 1029.
45. van der Meijden, E. et al. 1988. Defence and regrowth alternative plant strategies in the struggle against herbivores Oikos 51: 355 363.
46. van Kleunen, M. Schmid, B. 2003. No evidence for evolutionary increased competitive ability (EICA) in the invasive plant Solidago canadensis Ecology 84: 2824 2831.
47. Vilà, M. et al. 2003. Are alien plants more competitive than their native conspecifics? A test using Hypericum perforatum L Oecologia 137: 211 215.
48. Weis, A. E. et al. 2000. Will plant vigor and tolerance be genetically correlated? Effects of intrinsic growth rate and self-limitation on regrowth Evol. Ecol. 14: 331 352.
49. Willis, A. J. et al. 2000. Is there evidence for the post-invasion evolution of increased size among invasive plant species? Ecol. Lett. 3: 275 283.
50. Wolfe, L. M. et al. 2004. Increased susceptibility to enemies following introduction in the invasive plant Silene latifolia Ecol. Lett. 7: 813 820.
51. Zhang, K. Lin, Y. 1994. Chinese tallow tree. China Forestry Press, Beijing in Chinese.
52. Zheng, H. et al. 2004. Invasive plants of Asia origin established in the United States and their natural enemies USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team FHTET-2004-05, Morgantown, WV.
53. Zou, J. et al. 2006. The effect of Chinese tallow tree (Sapium sebiferum) ecotype on soil-plant system carbon and nitrogen processes Oecologia 150: 272 281.
54. Zou, J. et al. 2007. Differences in morphological and physiological traits between native and invasive populations of Sapium sebiferum Funct. Ecol. 21: 721 730.
55. Zou, J. et al. 2008. Increased competitive ability and herbivory tolerance in the invasive plant Sapium sebiferum Biol. Invasions 10: 291 302.