Assessment of preservice teachers using alternative assessment methods

Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 117-135

  Shannon, David M ^a   Boll, Margaret ^a  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 53349118108     PISSN: 0920525X     EISSN: 15730425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF00156893     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Abruscato, J. (1993). Early results and tentative implications from the Vermont Portfolio Project. Phi Delta Kappan, 74(6), 474-477.
2. Alabama State Department of Education. (1992). Criteria for the Alabama Professional Education Personnel Evaluation System. Montgomery, AL: Author.
3. Allen v. Alabama State Department of Education, 612 F. Supp. 1046 (M.D. Ala. 1985)
4. Association of Teacher Educators. (1988). Teacher assessment. Reston, VA: Author.
5. Ayers, J. (1989). The NTE, PPST, and classroom performance. Jefferson City, MO: Association of Teacher Educators. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 305 373).
6. Barton, J., & Collins, A. (1993). Portfolios in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(3), 200-210.
7. Berry, D., Kisch, J., Ryan, C., & Uphoff, J. (1991). The process and product of portfolio construction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL., April, 1991.
8. Bird, T. (1990). The schoolteacher's portfolio: An essay of possibilities. In J. Millman and L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation: Assessing Elementary and Secondary School Teachers, 2nd ed., Newbury Pack, CA: SAGE Publications.
9. Bradley, A. (1992). Pilot test offers glimpse of board's teacher assessment. Education Week, 12(2).
10. Chiu, Y.C. (1989). An investigation of the relationships between the National Teacher Examinations and a performance-based assessment of professional knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
11. Cole, D.J. (1992). The developing professional: Process and product portfolios. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education (AACTE), San Antonio, TX.
12. Collins, A. (1990). Transforming the assessment of teacher: notes on a theory of assessment for the 21st century. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Catholic Education Association, Toronto, Canada.
13. Cruickshank, D.R., & Metcalf, K.K. (1993). Improving preservice teacher assessment through on-campus laboratory experiences. Theory into Practice, 32(2), 86-92.
14. Cruickshank, D. (1988). The uses of simulation in teacher preparation. Simulations and games, 19, 133-156.
15. D'Costa, A.G. (1993). The impact of courts on teacher competence testing. Theory into Practice, 32(2), 104-112.
16. Darling-Hammond. Educational Leadership, 46, 11-15, 17.
17. Delandshere, G. (1994). The assessment of teachers in the United States. Assessment in Education, 1(1), 95-113.
18. Eissenburg, T.E., & Rudner, L.M. (1988). State testing of teachers: A summary of current practices. Washington, DC: American Institute for Research.
19. Feuer, M.J., & Fulton, K. (1993). The many faces of performance assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 74(6), 478.
20. Frederickson, N., Saunders, D.R., & Wand, B. (1957). The In-Basket Test. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 71(9), 1-28.
21. Furthwengler, C. (1986). Multiple data sources in teacher evaluation. Paper presented at the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Francisco, CA.
22. Haertel, E. (1991). New Forms of Teacher Assessment. In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of Research in Education, Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
23. Jacobson, L., & Stilley, L.R. (1992). "Developing and scoring assessment center exercises." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA:. ERIC Reproduction Document No ED 351361).
24. Kurland, D.M. (1991). "Text Browser: A computer-based tool for managing, analyzing, and assessing student writing portfolios." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
25. LeMahieu, P.G., Gitomer, D.H., & Eresh, J.T. (1995). Portfolios in large-scale assessment: difficult but not impossible. Educational Measurement: issues and Practice, 14(3), 11-16, 25-28.
26. Madaus, G.F. & Kellaghan, T. (1993). The British experience with "authentic" testing, Phi Delta Kappan, 74(6), 458-469.
27. McNergney, R.F., Medley, D.M., Aylesworth, M.S., & Innes, A.H. (1983). Assessing teachers' planning abilities. Journal of Educational Research, 77(2), 108-111.
28. Meyer, C.A. (1992). What's the difference between authentic and performance assessment? Educational Leadership, 49(8), 39-40.
29. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (1992). Toward high and rigorous standards for the teaching profession. (3rd edition). Detroit, MI: Author.
30. Popham, W.J. (1993). Circumventing the high costs of authentic assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 74(6), 470-473.
31. Quirk, T., Witten, B., & Weinberg, B. (1973). Review of studies of the concurrent and predictive validity of the National Teacher Examinations. Review of Educational Research, 43(1), 89-114.
32. Rawls, P. (1995, June 22). Teacher testing to become law. Montgomery Advertiser, p. 3B.
33. Ryan, J.M., & Kuh, T.M. (1993). Assessment of preservice teachers and the use of portfolios. Theory into Practice, 32(2), 75-81.
34. Sandefur, J.T. (1985). Competency assessment of teachers. Action in Teacher Education, 7(1), 1-6.
35. Scriven, M. (1988). Duty-based evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1(4), 319-334.
36. Shannon, D.M., Ash, Barry, N.H., B.H., & Dunn, C. (April, 1995). Implementing a Portfolio-Based Evaluation System for Preservice Teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
37. Shannon, D.M. & Boll, M. (March, 1995). Teacher assessment methods: theory vs. reality. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Educational Research Association, Hilton Head, SC.
38. Shannon, D.M., Medley, D.M., & Hays, L. (1993a). The construct validity of a simulation exercise in classroom decision-making. Journal of Educatinal Research, 86(3), 180-183.
39. Shannon, D.M., Medley, D.M., & Hays, L. (1993b). Assessing Teacher's Functional Professional Knowledge. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 7(1), 7-20.
40. Shulman, L.S. (1989). The Paradox of Teacher Assessment. New Directions for Teacher Assessment (pp. 13-27). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
41. Shulman, L.S. (1988). A union of insufficiencies: Strategies for teacher assessment in a period of educational reform. Educational Leadership, 46, 36-41.
42. Shulman, L.S., & Sykes, G. (1986). A national board for teaching: In search of a bold standard. Paper prepared for the Task Force on Teaching as a Profession, Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy.
43. Smolen, L., & Newman, C. (1992). Portfolios: An Estimate of Their Validity and Practicality. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Educational Research Association, Hilton Head, SC., February, 1992.
44. Wilson, A.J. (1985). Knowledge for teachers: the origins of the National Teacher Examinations Program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA). Chicago, IL.ERIC Reproduction Document No. ED 262049)
45. Wolf, K. (1991a). The schoolteacher's portfolio: Issues in Design, Implementation, and Evaluation. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 129-136.
46. Wolf, K. (1991b). Teaching Portfolios: Synthesis of Research and Annotated Bibliography. San Francisco, CA: Far West Laboratory.
47. Worthen, B.R. (1993). Critical issues that will determine the future of alternative assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 74(6), 444-454.