Evaluating ontology mapping techniques: An experiment in public safety information sharing

Decision Support Systems

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 714-728

  Kaza, Siddharth ^a   Chen, Hsinchun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Intelligence and security informatics; Mutual information; Ontology mapping; Public safety information sharing

Indexed keywords

CONFORMAL MAPPING; INFORMATION THEORY; INTEROPERABILITY;

INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY INFORMATICS; MUTUAL INFORMATION; ONTOLOGY MAPPING; PUBLIC SAFETY INFORMATION SHARING;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 53349109725     PISSN: 01679236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2007.12.007     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ambite J.L., Arens Y., Hovy E., Philpot A., Gravano L., Hatzivassiloglou V., and Klavans J. Simplifying data access: the energy data collection project. IEEE Computer 18 1 (2001)
2. Berners-Lee T., Hendler J., and Lassila O. The semantic web. Scientific American (2001)
3. Bouguettaya A., Ouzzami M., Medjahed B., and Cameron J. Managing government databases. Computer 34 2 (2001)
4. Chen H., Zeng D., Atabakhsh H., Wyzga W., and Schroeder J. COPLINK: managing law enforcement data and knowledge. Communications of the ACM 46 1 (2003)
5. Chruch K.W., and Hanks P. Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics 16 1 (1990)
6. Doan A., Madhavan J., Domingos P., and Halevy A.Y. Learning to map between ontologies on the semantic web. Presented at 11th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2002) (2002)
7. Dunning T. Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics 19 1 (1993)
8. Edgington T., Choi B., Henson K., Raghu T.S., and Vinze A. Adopting ontology to facilitate knowledge sharing. Communications of the ACM 47 11 (2004)
9. Fano R.M. Transmission of Information (1961), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
10. Fellbaum C. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database (1998), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
11. Firat A., and Madnick S. Knowledge integration to ontological heterogeneity: challenges from financial information systems. Presented at Twenty-Third International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Barcelona, Spain (2001)
12. Gal A., Modica G., Jamil H., and Eyal A. Automatic ontology matching using application semantics. AI Magazine 26 1 (2005)
13. Gangemi A., Guarino N., Masolo C., and Oltramari A. Sweetening WordNet with DOLCE. AI Magazine 24 3 (2003)
14. Goh C.H. Representing and Reasoning about Semantic Conflicts in Heterogeneous Information Sources (1997), MIT
15. Gruber T.R. A translation approach to portable ontologies. Knowledge Acquisition 5 2 (1993)
16. Gruninger M., and Kopena J.B. Semantic integration through invariants. AI Magazine 26 1 (2005)
17. Kalfoglou Y., and Schorlemmer M. Information-flow-based Ontology Mapping: On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2002: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE- Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2002), Springer
18. Kalfoglou Y., and Schorlemmer M. Ontology mapping: the state of the art. Knowledge Engineering Review 18 1 (2003)
19. Kaza S., Wang Y., and Chen H. Enhancing border security: mutual information analysis to identify suspect vehicles. Decision Support Systems (2006)
20. Kim M.C., and Choi K.S. A comparison of collocation-based similarity measures in query expansion. Information Processing and Management 35 (1999)
21. Kim W., and Seo J. Classifying schematic and data heterogeneity in multidatabase systems. IEEE Computer 24 12 (1991)
22. Lenat D.B. Cyc: a large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure. Communications of the ACM 38 11 (1995)
23. Li J. LOM: a lexicon-based ontology mapping tool. Presented at Information Interpretation and Integration Conference (I3CON) (2004)
24. Loet L. Similarity measures, author cocitation analysis, and information theory. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 56 7 (2005)
25. Magerman D.M., and Marcus M.P. Parsing a natural language using mutual information statistics. Presented at Eight National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA (1990)
26. March S., Hevner A., and Ram S. Research commentary: an agenda for information technology research in heterogeneous and distributed environments. Information Systems Research 11 4 (2000)
27. McGuinness D., Fikes R., Rice J., and Wilder S. An environment for merging and testing large ontologies. Presented at 17th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 00) (2000)
28. Mitra P., Noy N.F., and Jaiswal A.R. OMEN: a probabilistic ontology mapping tool. Presented at 3rd International Conference on the Semantic Web, Hiroshima, Japan (2004)
29. Niles I., and Pease A. Towards a standard upper ontology. Presented at The Second International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems, Ogunquit, Maine (2001)
30. Noy N.F., Doan A., and Halevy A.Y. Semantic integration. AI Magazine 26 1 (2005)
31. Noy N.F., and Musen M.A. PROMPT: algorithm and tool for automated ontology merging and alignment. Presented at 17th national Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI '00) (2000)
32. Noy N.F., and Musen M.A. Anchor-PROMPT: using non-local context for semantic matching. Presented at Workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing at the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) (2001)
33. Noy N.F., and Musen M.A. Evaluating ontology-mapping tools: requirements and experience. Presented at 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, Siguenza, Spain (2002)
34. Noy N.F., and Musen M.A. PROMTDIFF: a fixed-point algorithm for comparing ontology versions. Presented at 18th national Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI '02) (2002)
35. O'Leary D.E. Different firms, different ontologies, and no one best ontology, intelligent systems and their applications. IEEE 15 5 (2000) [see also IEEE Intelligent Systems]
36. Omelayenko B. Integration of product ontologies for B2B marketplaces: a preview. SIGecom Exch. 2 1 (2001)
37. Pantel P., Philpot A., and Hovy E. Aligning database columns using mutual information. Presented at The 6th National Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o), Atlanta, GA (2005)
38. Pantel P., Philpot A., and Hovy E. Data alignment and integration [US government]. Computer 38 12 (2005)
39. Park J., and Ram S. Information systems interoperability: what lies beneath?. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 22 4 (2004)
40. Rahm E., and Bernstein P.A. A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. VLDB Journal 10 4 (2001)
41. Salton G., and McGill M.J. Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval (1983), McGraw Hill
42. Stevens R., Baker P., Bechhofer S., Ng G., Jacoby A., Paton N.W., Goble C.A., and Brass A. TAMBIS: transparent access to multiple bioinformatics information sources. Bioinformatics 16 2 (2000)
43. Stumme G., and Maedche A. Ontology merging for federated ontologies on the semantic web. Presented at International Workshop for Foundations of Models for Information Integration (FMII 2001) (2001)
44. Tan P.-N., Vipin K., and Srivastava J. Selecting the right objective measure for association analysis. Information Systems 29 (2004)
45. Uschold M., and Gruninger M. Ontologies and semantics for seamless connectivity. SIGMOD Record 33 4 (2004)
46. Wache H., Vogele T., Visser U., Stuckenschmidt H., Schuster G., Neumann H., and Hubner S. Ontology-based integration of information - a survey of existing approaches. Presented at IJCAI Workshop: Ontologies and Information Sharing, Seattle, WA (2001)