Utilizing qualitative data analysis software: A review of Atlas.ti

Social Science Computer Review

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 519-527

  Hwang, Sungsoo ^a  

^a GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Content analysis; Qualitative data analysis software; Qualitative research; Text analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 53349101223     PISSN: 08944393     EISSN: 15528286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0894439307312485     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Barry, C.A. (1998). Choosing qualitative data analysis software: Atlas/ti and Nudist compared. Sociological Research Online, 3 (3). Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/3/3/4.html
2. Brower, R. (2006, September). Using qualitative analysis software in public administration research: An illustration and review. Paper presented at the Southeast Conference on Public Administration, Athens, Georgia.
3. Evans, W. (1996). Computer-supported content analysis: Trends, tools, and techniques. Social Science Computer Review, 14, 269-279.
4. Klahr, D., & Kotovsky, K. (Eds.). (1989). Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert A. Simon. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. MacMillan, K., & Koenig, T. (2004). The wow factor: Preconceptions and expectations for data analysis software in qualitative research. Social Science Computer Review, 22, 179-186.
6. Maietta, R.C. (2006, October). Best practices: Delve a little deeper into your research. Inside Atlas.ti-Your Quarterly Newsletter, 2006/2. Berlin, Germany: ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH. Retrieved from http://www.atlasti.com/newsletter20062003.html
7. Mangaberia, W.C., Lee, R.M., & Fielding, N.G. (2004). Computers and qualitative research: Adoption, use, and representation. Social Science Computer Review, 22, 167-178.
8. Muhr, T. (2004). ATLAS.ti 5.0 [Version 5:]. Berlin, Germany: ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH. Available from http://www.atlasti.com/
9. Shulman, S. (2006). Wither deliveration? Mass e-mail campaigns and U.S. regulatory rulemaking. Journal of E-Government, 3 (3). 41-64.
10. Weinstein, M. (2006). TAMS analyzer: Anthropology as cultural critique in a digital age. Social Science Computer Review, 24, 68-77.