Chinese Buddhist religious disputation

Argumentation

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 195-209

  Garrett, Mary M ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Buddhism; Chan; China; Dialectic; Disputation; India; Logic; Performative contradiction; Zen

Indexed keywords

EID: 53249156304     PISSN: 0920427X     EISSN: 15728374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1007747017533     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. T. = The Tokyo edition of the Tripitaka, Taishō shinshū daizōkyō. Ed. and comp. Takakusu Junjirō et al. 85 vols. Taishō Issaikyō Kank̄kei, Tokyo, 1924-1932.
2. Aitken, Robert: 1990, The Gateless Barrier: The Wu-men kuan (Mumonkan), North Point, San Francisco.
3. Chang, Chung-yuan: 1965, 'Ts'ao-tung Ch'an and its Metaphysical Background', Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 5(1), 33-66.
4. Chang, Chung-yuan: 1969, Original Teachings of Ch'an Buddhism, Vintage, New York.
5. Chi, R. S. Y.: 1969, Buddhist Formal Logic, Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, London.
6. Cleary, Thomas: Sayings and Doings of Pai-chang, Center Publications, Los Angeles.
7. Cleary, Thomas and J. C. Cleary: 1977, The Blue Cliff Record, Shambala, Boulder.
8. Cleary, Thomas and J. C. Cleary: 1990, Book of Serenity, Lindisfarne Press, New York.
9. Daye, Douglas Dunsmore: 1973, Review of Richard S. Y. Chi, Buddhist Formal Logic. Philosophy East and West 23(4), 525-535.
10. Daoxuan: 664, Ji gujin fodao lunheng, T. 2104
11. Daoxuan: c. 664, Guang hongming ji, T. 2103.
12. Epstein, Mark: 1995, Thoughts Without a Thinker: Psychotherapy from a Buddhist Perspective, Basic Books, NY.
13. Factor, R. Lance: 1983, 'What is the "Logic" in Buddhist Logic?', Philosophy East and West 33(2), 183-188.
14. Garrett, Mary M.: 1994, 'The "Three Doctrines Debates" of Tang China: Competitive Religious Debate as a Rhetorical Strategy', Argumentation and Advocacy 30(3), 150-161.
15. Garrett, Mary M.: 1993a, 'Wit, Power, and Oppositional Groups: A Case Study of "Pure Talk" ', Quarterly Journal of Speech 79(3), 303-318.
16. Garrett, Mary M.: 1993b, 'Classical Chinese Conceptions of Argumentation and Persuasion', Argumentation and Advocacy 29(3), 105-115.
17. Graham, Angus C.: 1978, Later Mohist Logic, Ethics and Science, Chinese University Press,Hong Kong.
18. Gupta, Bina: 1980, 'Are the Hetvābhāsas Formal Fallacies?', Journal of Indian Philosophy 8, 135-147.
19. Jan, Yun-hua: 1972, 'Tsung-mi: His Analysis of Ch'an Buddhism', T'oung Pao 58, 1-54.
20. Kohn, Livia: 1995, Laughing at the Tao: Debates among Buddhists and Taoists in Medieval China, Princeton University, Princeton.
21. Kroll, J. R.: 1985, 'Disputation in Ancient Chinese Culture', Early China 11-12, 118-145.
22. Powell, Robert: 1986, The Record of Tung-shan, University of Honolulu Press, Hawaii.
23. Robinson, Richard H.: 1967, Early Mādhyamika in India and China, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wis.
24. Robinson, Richard H.: 1972, 'Did Nāgārjuna Really Refute all Philosophical Views?', Philosophy East and West 22(3), 325-331.
25. Senzaki, Nyogen and Ruth McCandless: 1961, Iron Flute: 100 Zen Koan, C.E. Tuttle, Rutland, VT.
26. Schloegl, Irmgard: 1976, The Zen Teaching of Rinzai, Shambala, Berkeley.
27. Swanson, Paul: 1989, Foundations of T'ien-T'ai Philosophy: The Flowering of the Two Truths Theory in Chinese Buddhism, Asian Humanities, Berkeley.
28. Vassiliev, Boris: 1937, ' "Ju-shih Lun" - A Logical Treatise Ascribed to Vasubandhu', Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 8(4), 1013-1037.
29. Zongmi: 833, Chanyuan zhuquan, T 2015.