Clinical and histological responses to laparoscopically-induced peritonitis in rats

Acta Cirurgica Brasileira

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 456-461

  Bicalho, Paulo Roberto Rodrigues ^a,b   Lima, Leandro Bueno ^b   De Alvarenga, Daniel Gomes ^b   Duval Araujo, Ivana ^a   Nunes, Tarcizo Afonso ^a   Dos Reis, Fabíola Alves ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSIDADE VALE DO RIO DOCE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Laparoscopy; Models, animal; Peritonitis; Rats

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CECUM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GASTRIC BANDING; HISTOLOGY; LAPAROSCOPY; LIGATION; NONHUMAN; PERITONEAL CAVITY; PERITONITIS; RAT; SEPSIS; WISTAR RAT;

EID: 53249127357     PISSN: 01028650     EISSN: 16782674     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0102-86502008000500012     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Ryan NT, Blackburn GL, Clowes HA. Differential tissue sensitivity to elevated endogenous insulin levels during experimental peritonitis in rats. Metabolism. 1974;23:1081-9.
2. Wichterman KA, Baue AE, Chaudry IH. Sepsis and septic shock: a review of laboratory models and a proposal. J Surg Res. 1980;29:189-201.
3. Hanly EJ, Mendonza-Sagaon M, Murata K, Hadacre JM, De Maio A, Talamini MA. CO2 pneumoperitoneum modifies the inflammatory response to sepsis. Ann Surg. 2003;237:343-50.
4. Garrido AG, Figueiredo LFP, Silva MR. Experimental models of sepsis and septic shock: an overview. Acta Cir Bras. 2004;19:82-8.
5. Gupta A, Watson DI. Effect of laparoscopy on immune function. Br J Surg. 2001;88:1296-306.
6. Parker SJ, Watkins PE. Experimental models of gram-negative sepsis. Br J Surg. 2001;88:22-30.
7. Marshall JC, Deitch E, Moldawer LL, Opal S, Redl H, van der Poll T. Preclinical models of shock and sepsis: what can they tell us? Shock. 2005; 24(Suppl. 1):1-6.
8. Pokala N, Sadhasivam S; Kiran RP; Parithivel V. Complicated appendicitis: is the laparoscopic approach appropriate? A comparative study with the open approach: outcome in a community hospital setting. Am Surg. 2007;73:737-41.
9. Ortega AE, Tang E. Laparoscopic appendectomy. In: Toouli J, Gossot D, Hunter JG. Endosurgery. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1996. p.657-64.
10. Serour F, Witzling M, Gorenstein A. Is laparoscopic appendectomy in children associated with an uncommon postoperative complication? Surg Endosc. 2005;19:919-22.
11. Soler-Dorda G, Fernández-Díaz MJ, Martín-Parra I, Alonso-Gayón JL, Conty-Serrano JL, de Andrés-Fuertes MA, Bárcena-Barros JM. Complicaciones sépticas intraabdominales tras apendicectomía laparoscópica: descripción de una posible nueva complicación específica de la apendicectomía laparoscópica. Cir Esp. 2007;82:21-6.
12. Mathiak G, Szewczyk D, Abdullah F, Ovadia P, Feuerstein G, Rabinovici R. An improved clinically relevant sepsis model in the conscious rat. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:1947-52.
13. Salgado Junior W, Cunha FQ, Sankarankuty AS, Santos JS. Desenvolvimento de modelo de peritonite bacteriana para avaliação do tratamento mediante acesso laparotômico e video-laparoscópico. Acta Cir Bras. 2001;16(Suppl. 1):9-12.
14. Bicalho PRR, Moreno TP, Alvarenga DG, Reis FA, Duval-Araujo I. Ligadura elástica de intestino de frango: modelo para simulação de peritonite bacteriana. In: II Simpósio de Pesquisa e Iniciaç ão Científica da UNIVALE; 2004. Governador Valadares, MG: Editora Univale; 2004. p.104.
15. L'Her E, Amerand A, Vettier A, Sebert P. Effects of mild induced hypothermia during experimental sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:2621-3.
16. Ritter C, Andrades M, Frota Júnior ML, Bonatto F, Pinho RA, Polydoro M, Klamt F, Pinheiro CT, Menna-Barreto SS, Moreira JC, Dal-Pizzol F. Oxidative parameters and mortality in sepsis induced by cecal ligation and perforation. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29:1782-9.
17. Ebong S, Call D, Nemzek J, Bolgos G, Newcomb D, Remick D. Immunopathologic alterations in murine models of sepsis of increasing severity. Infect Immunol. 1999;67:6603-10.