A contrast effect between the concurrent production and perception of movement directions

Visual Cognition

Volumn 16, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 953-978

  Zwickel, Jan ^a   Grosjean, Marc ^a   Prinz, Wolfgang ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; EFFECT SIZE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 53249125051     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280701653586     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Brewer, N. T. and Chapman, G. B. (2003) Contrast effects in judgments of health hazards. Journal of Social Psychology, 143:3, pp. 341-354.
2. Chua, R. and Weeks, D. J. (1997) Dynamical explorations of compatibility in perception-action coupling. Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility, pp. 373-398. North-Holland, Amsterdam
3. De Jong, R. (1993) Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19:5, pp. 965-980.
4. DiLollo, V. (1964) Contrast effects in the judgment of lifted weights. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, pp. 383-387.
5. Ehrenstein, W. H., Cavonius, C. R. and Lewke, E. (1996) Spatial visuo-motor compatibility and manual control in a tracking task. Human factors in training and simulation, pp. 12-22. Traffic Research Center, VSC, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
6. Hamilton, A. F., Joyce, D. W., Flanagan, J. R., Frith, C. D. and Wolpert, D. (2005) Kinematic cues in perceptual weight judgement and their origins in box lifting. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 71, pp. 13-21.
7. Hamilton, A., Wolpert, D. and Frith, U. (2004) Your own action influences how you perceive another person's action. Current Biology, 14:6, pp. 493-498.
8. Hamilton, A. F., Wolpert, D. M., Frith, U. and Grafton, S. T. (2006) Where does your own action influence your perception of another person's action in the brain?. Neuroimage, 29:2, pp. 524-535.
9. Heuer, H. and Klein, W. (2006) The modulation of intermanual interactions during the specification of the directions of bimanual movements. Experimental Brain Research, 169:2, pp. 162-181.
10. Hommel, B., Musseler, J., Aschersleben, G. and Prinz, W. (2001) The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24:5, pp. 849-937.
11. (1997) Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility, North-Holland, Amsterdam
12. Humphreys, G., Riddoch, M., Forti, S. and Ackroyd, K. (2004) Action influences spatial perception: Neuropsychological evidence. Visual Cognition, 11, pp. 401-427.
13. Jacobs, A. and Shiffrar, M. (2005) Walking perception by walking observers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31:1, pp. 157-169.
14. Jolicoeur, P. (1999) Dual-task interference and visual encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25:3, pp. 596-616.
15. Kerzel, D. (2001) Visual short-term memory is influenced by haptic perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27:4, pp. 1101-1109.
16. Kilner, J. M., Paulignan, Y. and Blakemore, S. J. (2003) An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology, 13:6, pp. 522-525.
17. Makeig, S., Muller, M. M. and Rockstroh, B. (1996) Effects of voluntary movements on early auditory brain responses. Experimental Brain Research, 110:3, pp. 487-492.
18. Marshak, W. and Sekuler, R. (1979) Mutual repulsion between moving visual targets. Science, 205, pp. 1399-1401.
19. Meyer, D. E. and Kieras, D. E. (1997) A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, pp. 3-65.
20. Michaels, C. F. and Stins, J. F. (1997) An ecological approach to stimulus-response compatibility. Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility, pp. 333-360. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam
21. Miller, J. and Ulrich, R. (2001) On the analysis of psychometric functions: The Spearman-Karber method. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, pp. 1399-1420.
22. Miller, J. and Ulrich, R. (2004) A computer program for Spearman-Karber and probit analysis of psychometric function data. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36:1, pp. 11-16.
23. Musseler, J. (1999) Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events, 129, pp. 121-147. Elsevier, Amsterdam
24. Musseler, J. and Hommel, B. (1997) Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23:3, pp. 861-872.
25. Pashler, H. (1994) Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116:2, pp. 220-244.
26. Patterson, R. and Becker, S. (1996) Direction-selective adaptation and simultaneous contrast induced by stereoscopic (cyclopean) motion. Vision Research, 36:12, pp. 1773-1781.
27. Prinz, W. (1990) A common coding approach to perception and action. Relationships between perception and action: Current approaches, pp. 167-201. Springer, New York
28. Prinz, W. (1997) Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9:2, pp. 129-154.
29. (2002) Attention and performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
30. (1990) Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective, North-Holland, Amsterdam
31. Rauber, H.-J. and Treue, S. (1999) Revisiting motion repulsion: Evidence for a general phenomenon?. Vision Research, 39:19, pp. 3187-3196.
32. Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L. and Sheliga, B. (1994) Space and selective attention. Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing, pp. 231-265. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
33. Schneider, W. and Deubel, H. (2002) Selection-for-perception and selection-for-spatial-motor-action are coupled by visual attention: A review of recent findings and new evidence from stimulus-driven saccade control. Attention and performance: XIX. Common mechanisms in perception and action, pp. 609-627. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
34. Schubo, A., Aschersleben, G. and Prinz, W. (2001) Interactions between perception and action in a reaction task with overlapping S-R assignments. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 65:3, pp. 145-157.
35. Schubo, A., Prinz, W. and Aschersleben, G. (2004) Perceiving while acting: Action affects perception. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 68:4, pp. 208-215.
36. Stevanovski, B., Oriet, C. and Jolicoeur, P. (2003) Can blindness to response-compatible stimuli be observed in the absence of a response?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, pp. 431-440.
37. Swinnen, S. P., Dounskaia, N., Levin, O. and Duysens, J. (2001) Constraints during bimanual coordination: The role of direction in relation to amplitude and force requirements. Behavioural Brain Research, 123:2, pp. 201-218.
38. Tipper, S. P., Howard, L. A. and Jackson, S. R. (1997) Selective reaching to grasp: Evidence for distractor interference effects. Visual Cognition, 4:1, pp. 1-38.
39. Ulrich, R. and Miller, J. (2004) Threshold estimation in two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) tasks: The Spearman-Karber method. Perception and Psychophysics, 66:3, pp. 517-533.
40. Viviani, P. (2002) Motor competence in the perception of dynamic events: A tutorial. Attention and performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action, pp. 406-442. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
41. Viviani, P. and Stucchi, N. (1992) Biological movements look uniform: Evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18:3, pp. 603-623.
42. Ward, R. (2002) Independence and integration of perception and action: An introduction. Visual Cognition, 9, pp. 385-391.
43. Westheimer, G. (1990) Simultaneous orientation contrast for lines in the human fovea. Vision Research, 30:11, pp. 1913-1921.
44. Winer, B. J. (1971) Statistical principles in experimental design, McGraw-Hill, New York
45. Wohlschlager, A. (2000) Visual motion priming by invisible actions. Vision Research, 40:8, pp. 925-930.
46. Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K. and Kawato, M. (2003) A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B. Biological Sciences, 358:1431, pp. 593-602.