Perennial Promises and Pitfalls in Arts Education Reform

Arts Education Policy Review

Volumn 99, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 8-14

  Stankiewicz, Mary Ann ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 53249101679     PISSN: 10632913     EISSN: 19404395     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10632919709600765     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Samuel Hope, “The Need for Policy Studies in Arts Education,” in The Challenge to Reform Arts Education: What Role Can Research Play? ed. David B. Pankratz and Kevin V. Mulcahy (New York: American Council for the Arts, 1989). 75.
2. Mary Erickson, “An Historical Explanation of the Schism Between Research and Practice in Art Education,” Studies in Art Education 20. no. 2 (1979): 5.
3. Arthur D. Efland, A History of Art Education (New York: Teachers College Press, 1990).
4. Sol Cohen, “The Shaping of American Education, 1790-1895.” in Education in the United States: A Documentary History, vol. 2 (New York: Random House, 1974), xiii.
5. Charles Fowler, Can We Rescue the Arts for America’s Children (New York: American Council for the Arts, 1988).
6. Gilbert A. Clark, Michael D. Day, and W. Dwaine Greer, “Discipline-based Art Education: Becoming Students of Art,” in Discipline-based Art Education: Origins, Meaning, and Development, ed. Ralph Smith (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1989), 129-93
7. Stephen Mark Dobbs, The DBAE Handbook (Santa Monica, Calif.: J. Paul Getty Trust, 1992).
8. Richard L. Bushman, The Refinement of America (New York: Vintage, 1992)
9. Stuart M. Blumin, The Emergence of the Middle Class (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989)
10. William J. Reese, The Origins of the American High School (New Haven: Yale, 1995)
11. Neil Harris, The Artist in American Society: The Formative Years, I790-1860 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982)
12. Annie V. F. Storr, “Ut Pictura Rhetorica: The Oratory of the Visual Arts in the Early Republic and the Formation of American Cultural Values, 1790-1 840” (Ph.D. diss.. University of Delaware, 1992).
13. Edward W. Stevens Jr., The Grammar of the Machine: Technical Literacy and Early Industrial Expansion in the United States (New Haven: Yale, 1995), 2.
14. Eugene S. Ferguson, “The Mind’s Eye: Nonverbal Thought in Technology,” Science 197, no. 4306 (1977): 827-36
15. Walter Smith, “Extracts from Addresses by Professor Walter Smith, Delivered at Montreal and Quebec,” in Art and Industry. Part 1, Drawing in Public Schools, Appendix 111, ed. Isaac Edwards Clarke. U.S. Senate report. 46th Cong., 2d sess., Vol. 7 (Washington: Government Printing Office,) 576ff.
16. Walter Smith, “Plan and Graded Programme of Instruction in Drawing for the Public Schools of Massachusetts, 1879” in Art and Industry. Part I, Drawing in Public Schools, Appendix C. ed. Isaac Edwards Clarke. U.S. Senate report. 46th Cong., 2d sess., Vol. 7 (Washington: Government Printing Office), 524
17. Walter Smith, “Three Lectures to Boston Teachers, by Walter Smith, Director of Drawing: Address to himary School Teachers,” in Art and Industry. Part I, Drawing in Public Schools, Appendix C, ed. Isaac Edwards Clarke. U.S. Senate report. 46th Cong., 2d sess., Vol. 7 (Washington: Government Printing Office), 551
18. David N. Perkins, The Intelligent Eye: Learning to Think by Looking at Art (Santa Monica, Calif.: J. Paul Getty Trust, 1994).
19. Walter Smith, “Three Lectures to Boston Teachers, by Walter Smith, Director of Drawing: Address to High School Teachers in Art and Industry. Part 1, Drawing in Public Schools, Appendix C, ed. Isaac Edwards Clarke. U.S. Senate report. 46th Cong., 2d sess., Vol. 7 (Washington: Government Printing Office), 570.
20. Isaac Edwards Clarke, “Drawing in the State of New York” in Art and Industry. Part 1, Drawing in Public Schools. US. Senate report. 46th Cong., 2d sess., Vol. 7 (Washington: Government Printing Office), 303-305.
21. Walter Smith, Art Education, Scholastic and Industrial (Boston: J. R. Osgood, 1873). 28.
22. Henry Turner Bailey, A Sketch of the History of Public AH Instruction in Massachusetts (Boston: Wright & Potter, 1900)
23. May Smith Dean, History of the Massachusetts Normal Art School 18734 to 19234 (Reprinted from ten issues of the Massachusetts Normal Art School Bulletin with slight changes and additions, April- May 1923)
24. Judith Smith Koroscik (coordinator), “Symposium on the Nature of Learning and Expertise in the Visual Arts: Some Considerations for Preparing Future Teachers,” Arts Education Policy Review 94, no. 5 (May/June 1993): 9-29.
25. Harry Beck Green, “The Introduction of Art as a General Education Subject in American Schools,” (Ed.D. diss., Stanford University, 1948), 149 and passim.
26. Mary Ann Stankiewicz, “Drawing Book Wars,” Visual Arts Research 12, no. 2 (1986):
27. Henry Turner Bailey, Journal for Grammar Schools, Lowell, 1885. Henry Turner Bailey Papers, Box 12, Special Collections, University of Oregon Library, Eugene. Paul Bolin has also concluded that mixed justifications for art education existed before and after Smith’s tenure in Boston
28. Paul Erik Bolin, “Drawing Interpretation: An Examination of the 1870 Massachusetts ‘Act Relating to Free Instruction in Drawing”’ (Ph.D. diss., University of Oregon, 1986).