Producing the evidence: science teachers' initiations into practical work

Research in Science Education

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 395-409

  Nott, Mick ^a   Wellington, Jerry ^b  

^a SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 53249086621     PISSN: 0157244X     EISSN: 15731898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02461761     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aikenhead, G. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27,1-52.
2. Barnes, B. (1985). About science. Oxford: Blackwell.
3. Brown, A., & Kompf, M. (1990). Lies teachers tell and the politics of language. In C. Day, M. Pope, & P. Denicolo (Eds.), Insight into teachers' thinking and practice (pp. 79-84). London: Palmer.
4. Department of Education and Science/Welsh Office (DES/WO). (1989). The national curriculum: Science. London: HMSO.
5. Department of Education and Science/Welsh Office (DES/WO). (1991). Science in the national curriculum. London: HMSO.
6. Department for Education/Welsh Office (DES/WO).(1995). Science in the national curriculum. London: HMSO.
7. Ekman, P. (1985). Telling lies. New York: Norton
8. Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1937). Witchcraft, oracles and magic among the Azande. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
9. Gough, N. (1993). Laboratories in schools: Material places, mythic spaces. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 39(2), 29-33.
10. Kouladis, V., & Ogborn, J. (1989). Philosophy of science: An empirical study of teachers' views. IntemationalJoumal ofScience Education, 11(2), 173-184.
11. Kouladis, V., & Ogborn, J. (1995). Science teachers' philosophical assumptions: How well do we understand them? IntemationalJoumal of Science Education, 77(3), 273-283.
12. Lakin, S., & Wellington, J. (1994). Who will teach the nature of science? Teachers' views of science and their implication for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 16(2), 175-190.
13. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
14. Maddock, M. N. (1981). Science education: An anthropological viewpoint. Studies in Science Education, 8, 1-26.
15. Millar, R. (1996). A science curriculum for public understanding. School Science Review, 77(280), 7-18.
16. Mulkay, M. (1991). Norms and ideology. In M. Mulkay (Ed.), Sociology of science: A sociological pilgrimage (pp. 62-78). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
17. (Originally published as Norms and Ideology in Science. Social Science Information, 1976, 75(4), 637-656.
18. Mulkay, M., & Gilbert, G. (1984). Opening Pandora's box: A sociological analysis of scientists' discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Nott, M. (1994). Practical approaches to teaching and learning about the nature of science. In J. Wellington (Ed.), Secondary science: Contemporary issues and practical approaches (pp. 258-283). Routledge: London.
20. Nott, M., & Smith, R. (1995). 'Talking your way out of it," "rigging" and "conjuring": What science teachers do when practicals "go wrong." International Journal of Science Education, 77(3), 399-410.
21. Nott, M., & Wellington, J. (1993). Your nature of science: An activity for science teachers. School Science Review, 75(270), 109-112.
22. Nott, M., & Wellington, J. (1995a). Critical incidents in science. Milton Keynes: Open University (Science Document 14 in the Teaching Science in Secondary Schools series).
23. Nott, M., & Wellington, J. (1995b). Critical incidents in the science classroom and the nature of science. School Science Review, 76(276), 41-46.
24. Nott, M., & Wellington, J. (1996a). Ethics and morals in the science classroom. In M. Oakes (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1995 ASE INSET Services annual conference, The public understanding of science: A controversial issue? (pp. 23-32). Harfield: Association for Science Education.
25. Nott, M., & Wellington, J. (1996b).'When the black box springs open: Practical work in school science and the nature of science. IntemationalJoumal of Science Education, 18(7), 807-818.
26. Nott, M., & Wellington, J. (in press). Teaching teachers the nature of science. In W. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
27. Phelan, P., Davidson, A., & Cao, H. (1991). Students' multiple worlds: Negotiating the boundaries of family, peer and school cultures. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 22(2), 224-250.
28. Pomeroy, D. (1993). Implications of teachers' beliefs about the nature of science: Comparison of the beliefs of scientists, secondary science teachers, and elementary teachers. Science Education, 77(3), 261-278.
29. Solomon, J. (1990). A report on the implementation of attainment target 17. Oxford: Oxford University, Department of Educational Studies.
30. Solomon, J. (1991). Exploring the nature of science. Glasgow: Blackie.
31. Solomon, J. (1992). Of science teaching. Education in Science, 148, 12-13.
32. Sutton, C. (1996). The scientific model as a form of speech. In G. Welford, J. Osborne, & P. Scott (Eds.), Research in science education in Europe (pp. 143-152). London: Palmer.
33. Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. London: Harvard University Press.
34. Ziman, J. M. (1967). Public knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Ziman, J. M. (1984). An introduction to science studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.