Informal logic in the twentieth century

Historical Foundations of Informal Logic

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 158-177

  Johnson, Ralph H ^a   Blair, J Anthony ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 53149135607     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (89)

1. Austin, J. L. (1962), How to Do Things with Words, Oxford University Press: Oxford
2. Austin, J. L. (1970), Philosophical Papers, 2nd ed., edited by 1. O. Unnson, Clarendon Press: Oxford
3. Barth, E. M., and Erik C W. Krabbe (1982), From Axiom to Dialogue: A Philosophic Study of Logics and Argumentation, de Gruyter: Berlin
4. Battersby, Mark E. (1989), 'Critical Thinking as Applied to Epistemology', Inforowl Logic, Vol. II, pp. 91-99
5. Beardsley, Monroe C (1950), Practical LogIC, Prentice-Hall: Engelwood ClitIs, NJ
6. Black, Max (1955), Critical Thinking, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ
7. Blair, J Anthony, and Ralph H. Johnson (eds) (1980), Infonnal Logic: The First International Symposium, Edgepress: Point Reyes, CA
8. Blair, J. Anthony, and Ralph H. Johnson (1987), 'Argumentation as Dialectical', Argumentation, Vol. 1, pp. 41-56
9. Bnnton, Alan (1985), 'A Rhetorical View of the ad Hominem', Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 63, pp. 50-63
10. Carney, James D, and Richard K. Scheer (1964), Fundamentals of Logic, Macmillan: New York
11. Conway, David A. (1991), 'On the Distinction Between Convergent and Linked Arguments', Inforowl Logic, Vol. 13, pp.145-158
12. Copi, Irving (1953), Introduction to Logic, Macmillan: New York
13. Copi, Irving and Carl Cohen (1990), Introduction to Logic, 8th ed., Macmillan: New York
14. Damer, T. Edward (1980), Attacking Faulty Reasoning, Wadsworth: Belmont, CA
15. Dewey, John (1938), Logic, The Theory of Inquiry, Irvington: New York
16. Dewey, John (1933), How We Think, Heath: Boston
17. Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Rob Grootendorst (1983), Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions, Foris: Dordrecht
18. Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Rob Grootendorst (1992a), Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-dialectic Perspective, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, NJ
19. Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Rob Grootendorst (eds.) (1992b), Argumentation, Vol. 6
20. Eemeren, Frans H. van and Tjark Kruiger (1987), 'IdentifYing Argumentation Schemes', in Eemeren, F. H. van, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair, and C A. Willard (eds.), Argumentation:Perspectives and Appraoches, Proceedings of the 1986 Amsterdam Conference on Argumentation, Foris: Dordrecht, pp. 70-81
21. Eemeren, Frans H. van, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair, and Charles A. Willard (eds.) (1992), Argumentation Illuminated, Sic Sat: Amsterdam
22. Eemeren, Frans H. van, Rob Grootendorst, and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (eds.) (1996), Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ
23. Fearnside, W. Ward, and William B. Holther (1959), Fallacy, The Counterfeit of Argument, Prentice-Hall: Engelwood Cliffs, NJ
24. Finocchiaro, Maurice A (1981), 'Fallacies and the Evaluation of Reasoning', American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 18, pp. 13-22
25. Fogelin, Robert (1978), Understanding Arguments: An Introduction to Informal Logic, Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich: New York
26. Freeman, James B. (1988), Thinking logically: Basic Concepts for Reasoning, PrenticeHall: Englewood Cliffs, N1
27. Goldman, Alvin (1986), Epistemology and Cognition, Harvard University Press: Cambridge
28. Govier, Trudy (1982), 'Who Says There Are No Fallacies?', Informal Logic Newsletter, Vol. 5, pp. 2-10
29. Govier, Trudy (1985), A Practical Study of Argument, Wadsworth: Belmont, CA
30. Govier, Trudy (1987), Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation, Foris: Dordrect
31. Grice, Paul (1975), 'Logic and Conversation', in Cole, P. and 1. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Academic Press: New York
32. Hansen, H V (1990), 'An Informal Logic Bibliography', Informal Logic, Vol. 12, pp.155-184
33. Hansen, H. V, and Robert C. Pinto (eds.) (1995), Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings, The PeIUlsylvania State University Press: University Park
34. Hintikka, Jaakko (1989), 'The Role of Logic in Argumentation', The lvionist, Vol. 72, pp.3-24
35. Hitchcock, David (1983), Critical Thinking: A Guide to Evaluating Information, Methuen: Toronto
36. Johnson, Ralph H. (1987), 'The Blaze of Her Splendours: Suggestions About Revitalizing Fallacy Theory', Argumentation, Vol. 1, pp. 239-253
37. Johnson, Ralph H. (1989), 'Massey on Fallacy and Informal Logic: A Reply', Synthese, Vol. 80, pp. 407-26
38. Johnson, Ralph H (1990a), 'Hamblin on the Standard Treatment', Philosophy and Rhetoric, Vol. 23, pp. 153-67
39. Johnson, Ralph H (1990b ), 'Acceptance Is Not Enough: A Critique of Hamblin', Philosophy and Rhetoric, Vol. 23 pp. 271-287
40. Johnson, Ralph H, and J. Anthony Blair (1993), Logical Self-Defense, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill Ryerson: Toronto
41. Johnson, Ralph H., and J. Anthony Blair (1980), 'The Recent Development ofInformal Logic', in Blair and Johnson (1980)
42. Johnson, Ralph H., and J. Anthony Blair (1985), 'Informal Logic: The Past Five Years, 1978-83', American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 22, pp. 181-196
43. Johnson, Ralph H, and J Anthony Blair (1987), 'The Current State of Informal Logic and Critical Thinking', Informal Logic, Vol. 9, pp. 147-51
44. Johnson, Ralph H., and J. Anthony Blair (1991), 'Contexts of Informal Reasoning: Commentary', in Voss, James F., David N. Perkins and Judith N. Segal (eds.), Informal Reasoning and Education, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ, pp.131-50
45. Kahane, Howard (1992), Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric. The Use of Reasoning in Everyday Life, 6th ed., Wadsworth: Belmont, CA
46. Kienpointner, Manfred (1992), Alltagslogic: Struktur lind funktion von argumentationsmllstern, FrommaIUl-Holzboog: Stuttgart-Bad CaIUlstatt
47. Little, J. Frederick, Leo A. Groarke, and Christopher W. Tindale (1989), Good Reasoning,Hatters, McLelland and Stewart: Toronto
48. Massey, Gerald (1981), 'The Fallacy Behind Fallacies', Midwest Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 6, pp. 489-500
49. McPeck, John (1981), Critical Thinking and EducatIOn, Martin Robertson: Oxford
50. Munson, Ronald (1976), The Way of Words: An Informal Logic, Houghton Mifflin: New York
51. Nisbett, Richard E., and Lee Ross (1980), Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement, Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ
52. Norris, Stephen, and Robert Ennis (1989), Evaluating Critical Thinking, Midwest Publications: Pacific Grove, CA
53. Perelman, Chairn, and Lucy Olbrechts-Tyteca (1958), La nouvelle rhetorique: Traite de I 'argumentation, Presses Universitaires de France: Paris
54. Perelman, Chairn, and Lucy Olbrechts-Tyteca (1969), The New Rhetoric, translated by John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver, University of Notre Dame Press: Notre Dame, IN
55. Pomeroy, Ralph (1982), 'Ryle on (and for) Informal Logic', Informal Logic Newsletter, Vol. 5, pp. 23-25
56. Rescher, Nicholas (1964), Introduction to Logic, St Martin's Press: New York
57. Rescher, Nicholas (1976), PlausIble Reasoning: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Plausible Inference, Van Gorcum: Assen
58. Rescher, Nicholas (1977), Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge, State University of New York Press: Albany
59. Rvle. GIlbert (1954), Dilemmas, Cambridge University Press Cambridge
60. Schellens, Peter Jan (1987), 'Types of Argument and the Critical Reader', in Eemeren, F H. van, R. Grootendorst, J A Blair, and C. A Willards (eds.), Argumentation: Analyses and Practices, Proceedings of the 1986 Amsterdam Conference on Argumentation, Foris: Dordrecht, pp. 734-41
61. Scm'en, Michael (1976), Reasoning, McGraw-Hill: New York
62. Scnven, Michael (1987), 'Probative Logic', in Eemeren, F. H, van, R. Grootendorst, J. A Blair, and C. A Willards (eds,), Argumentation: Across the Lines of DiScipline, Proceedings of the 1986 Amsterdarri Conference on Argumentation, Foris: Dordrecht, pp. 7-32
63. Scnven, Michael (1995), 'The Logic of Evaluation in Practice', in Fournier, Deborah M. (ed.), Reasoning in Evaluation: Inferential Links and Leaps, Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, New Directions for Evaluation, No. 68, pp. 49-70
64. Seech, Zachary (1993), Open Minds and Everyday Reasoning, Wadsworth: Belmont, CA
65. Siegel, Harvey (1988), Educating Reason: Rationality, Critical Thinking and Education, Routledge: New York
66. Snoeck Henkemans, A F. (1992), AnalYZing Complex Argumentation, Sic Sat: Amsterdam
67. Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson (1988), Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Harvard University Press: Cambridge
68. Stebbmg, Susan L (1939), Thinking to Some Purpose, Whitefriars Press: London
69. Thomas, Stephen N. (1984), Practical Reasoning in Natural Language, 3rd ed' Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ
70. Thouless, Robert (1930), Straight and Crooked Thinking, Hodder and Stoughton: London
71. Toulmin, Stephen (1958), The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge
72. Toulmin, Stephen, Richard Rieke, and Allan Janik (1984), 2nd ed., An Introduction to Reasoning, Macmillan: New York
73. Walton, Douglas N. (1984), Logical Dialogue Games and Fallacies, University Press of America: Lanham, MD
74. Walton, Douglas N. (1985), Arguer's Position: A Pragmatic Study of 'Ad Hominem' Attack, Criticism, Refutation and Fallacy, Greenwood Press: Westport, CT
75. Walton, Douglas N. (1989), Informal Logic. A Handbookfor Critical Argumentation, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge
76. Walton, Douglas N. (1991), Begging the Question, Greenwood Press, New York
77. Walton, Douglas N. (1992), The Place of Emotion in Argument, The Pennsylvania State University Press: University Park
78. Walton, Douglas N. (1995), A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy, The University of Alabama Press: Tuscaloosa and London
79. Walton, Douglas N. (1996), Argument Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, N1
80. Walton, Douglas N, and Eric C. W. Krabbe (1995), Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts in Interpersonal Reasoning, State University of New York Press: Albany
81. Weddle, Perry (1978), Argument, A Guide to Critical Thinking, McGraw-Hill: New York
82. Weinstein, Mark (1990), 'Towards a Research Agenda for Informal Logic and Critical Thinking', Informal Logic, Vol. 2, pp. 121-143
83. Willard, Charles Arthur, and J. Robert Cox (eds.) (1982), Advances in Argumentation Theory and Research, Southern Illinois University Press: Carbondale and Edwardsville
84. Woods, John (1980), 'What is Informal Logic?', in Blair and Johnson (1980), pp. 57-68
85. Woods, John (1992) 'Who Cares About the Fallacies?', in van Eemeren, et al. (1992), pp.23-48
86. Woods, John, and Douglas Walton (1982), Argument: The Logic of the Fallacies, McGraw-Hill Ryerson: Toronto
87. Woods, John, and Douglas Walton (1989), Fallacies: Selected Papers 1972-1982, Foris: Dordrecht
88. Wreen, Michael J (1987), Yes, Virginia, There is a Santa Claus', Infomwl Logic, Vol. 9, pp.31-39
89. Yanal, Robert J. (1991), 'Dependent and Independent Reasons', Informal Logic, Vol. 13, pp.137-144