Formalizing a systematic review updating process

Proceedings - 6th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications, SERA 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 143-150

  Dieste, Oscar ^a,d   López, Marta ^b   Ramos, Felicidad ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c INDRA Systems ^*  (Spain)

^d FRAUNHOFER IESE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING RESEARCH;

BODY OF KNOWLEDGE; ELICITATION TECHNIQUES; IMPROVED PROCESS; SOFTWARE SYSTEMS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

APPLICATION PROGRAMS;

EID: 53149131367     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SERA.2008.35     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Agarwal, R. and Tanniru, M. R., "Knowledge Acquisition Using Structured Interviewing: An Empirical Investigation," Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 7, pp. 123-141, Summer, 1990.
2. Bech-Larsen, T. and Nielsen, N. A., "A comparison of five elicitation techniques for elicitation of attributes of low involvement products," Journal of Economic Psychology, vol. 20, pp. 315-341, 1999.
3. Biolchini, J., Mian, P., Natali, A., and Travassos, G. H., COPPE/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, ES 679/05, 2005.
4. Bradburn, B., "A comparison of knowledge elicitation methods," International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED'91), pp. 298-305, 1991.
5. Breivik, E. and Supphellen, M., "Elicitation of product attributes in an evaluation context: A comparison of three elicitation techniques," Journal of Economic Psychology, vol. 24, pp. 77-98, 2003.
6. Browne, G. J. and Rogich, M. B., "An Empirical Investigation of User Requirements Elicitation: Comparing the Effectiveness of Prompting Techniques," Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 17, pp. 223-249, Spring, 2001.
7. th Conference in Artificial Intelligence ECAI-88, 1988.
8. Burton, A. M., Shadbolt, N. R., Rugg, G., and Hedgecock, A. P., "The efficacy of knowledge acquisition techniques: A comparison across domains and levels of expertise," Knowledge Acquisition, vol. 2, pp. 167-178, 1990.
9. Corbridge, B., Rugg, G., Major, N. P., Shadbolt, N. R., and Burton, A. M., "Laddering - technique and tool use in knowledge acquisition," Knowledge Acquisition, vol. 6, pp. 315-341, 1994.
10. Davis, A., Dieste, O., Hickey, A., Juristo, N., and Moreno, A. M., "Effectiveness of Requirements Elicitation Techniques: Empirical Results derived from a Systematic Review," Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering, Minneapolis, Minessota, 2006.
11. de Bont, C. J. P. M., Consumer Evaluation of Early Product-Concepts 1992. Delft University.
12. Dieste, O. "TR2. Protocolo de revisión de estudios empíricos," http://grise.ls.fi.upm.es/research_documents.php, 2006.
13. Dieste, O. "TR3. Resultados extraídos de los estudios empíricos seleccionados (http://grise.ls.fi.upm.es/research_documents. php)," http://grise.ls.fi.upm.es/research_documents.php, 2006.
14. Dieste, O., Fernández, E., Grimán, A., López, M., and Ramos, F., "Systematic Reviews: Some Practical Experiences," Submitted to the 2nd Workshop on Empirical Software Engineering and Metrics., Kaiserslautern, Germany.
15. Dieste, O., Juristo, J., and Shull, F., "Understanding the Customer: What Do We Know about Requirements Elicitation Techniques?," IEEE Software, vol. 25, pp. 11-13, 2008.
16. Dieste, O. and Juristo, N., "Systematic Review and Aggregation of Empirical Studies on Elicitation Techniques," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 2008.
17. Dieste, O., López, M., and Ramos, F., "Obtaining Well-Founded Practices about Elicitation Techniques by Means of an Update of a Previous Systematic Review," Proceedings of SEKE'08, Redwood City, CA USA.
18. Dieste, O., López, M., and Ramos, F., "Formalizing a systematic review updating process," Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Technical Report, to appear.
19. Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., and Sutton, A., "Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods," Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, vol. 10, pp. 45-53B(9), 2005.
20. Dyba, T., Arisholm, E., Sjoberg, D. I. K., Hannay, J. E., and Shull, F., "Are two heads better than one? On the effectiveness of pair programming," IEEE Software, vol. 24, pp. 10-13, 2007.
21. Dyba, T., Kampenes, V., and Sjoberg, D., "A systematic review of statistical power in software engineering experiments," Information and Software Technology, vol. 48, pp. 745-755, 2006.
22. Geiwitz, J., Kornell, J., and McCloskey, B. P., "An Expert System for the Selection of Knowledge Acquisition Techniques," Anacapa Sciences, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, Technical Report 785-2, 1990.
23. Goguen, J. A. and Linde, C., "Techniques for requirements elicitation," Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, pp. 152-164, 1993.
24. L.V. Hedges and I. Olkin. Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis, Academic Press, 1985.
25. Higgins, J. P. T. and Green, S. Cochrane handbook for systematic review of interventions, Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., 2006.
26. Hu, Q., "Evaluating Alternative Software Production Function," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 23, pp. 379-387, 1997.
27. Jones, S. R. and Miles, J. C., "The Use of a Prototype System for Evaluating Knowledge Elicitation Techniques," Expert Systems, vol. 15, pp. 83-97, 1998.
28. Juristo, N., Moreno, A. M., and Vegas, S., "Reviewing 25 Years of Testing Technique Experiments," Journal of Empirical Software Engineering, vol. 9, pp. 7-44, 2004.
29. Khan, K., Khalid, S., Riet, G. T., Glanville, J., Sowden, A. J., and J.K., NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. University of York, CRD Report Number 4 (2nd edition), 2001.
30. B.A. Kitchenham. Procedures for performing systematic reviews, Keele University TR/SE-0401, 2004.
31. P. Loucopoulos and V. Karakostas. Systems Requirements Engineering, McGraw-Hill, 1995.
32. Maiden, N. A. M. and Rugg, G., "ACRE: selecting methods for requirements acquisition," Software Engineering Journal, vol. 11, pp. 183-192, 1996.
33. Marakas, G. M. and Elam, J. J., "Semantic structuring in analyst and representation of facts in requirements analysis," Information Systems Research, vol. 9, pp. 37-63, 1998.
34. Mendes, E., "A Systematic Review of Web Engineering Research," ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE'05), Noosa heads, Australia.
35. nd Experimental Software Engineering Latin American Workshop (ESELAW'05), 2005.
36. Moody, J. W., Will, R. P., and Blanton, J. E., "Enhancing knowledge elicitation using the cognitive interview," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 10, pp. 127-133, 1996.
37. Pitts, M. G. and Browne, G. J., "Stopping Behavior of Systems Analysts During Information Requirements Elicitation," Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 21, pp. 203-226, 2004.
38. C.C. Ragin. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1987.
39. Schweickert, R., Burton, A. M., Taylor, N. K., Corlett, E. N., Shadbolt, N. R., and Hedgecock, A. P., "Comparing knowledge elicitation techniques: A case study," Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 1, pp. 245-253, 1987.
40. Shull, F., Carver, J., Travassos, G. H., Maldonado, J. C., Conradi, R., and Basili, V. R. Replicated Studies: Building a Body of Knowledge about Software Reading Techniques. In: Lecture Notes on Empirical Software Engineering, ed. N. Juristo and A.M. Moreno. Singapore: World Scientific, 2003. pp. 39-84.
41. S.E. Straus, W.S. Richardson, P. Glasziou, and R.B. Haynes. Evidence-Based Medicine, Churchill Livingstone, 2005.
42. Wood, L. E., Davis, T. C., Clay, S. L., Ford, J. M., and Lammersen, S., "Evaluation of interviewing methods and mediating representations for knowledge acquisition," International Journal of Expert Systems, vol. 8, pp. 1-23, 1995.
43. Wooten, T. C. and Rowley, T. H., "Using anthropological interview strategies to enhance knowledge acquisition," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 9, pp. 469-482, 1995.
44. Yin, R. K. and Heald, K. A., "Using the Case Survey Method to Analyze Policy Studies," Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 20, pp. 371-381, 1975.