Governing nanotechnologies: Weaving new regulatory webs or patching up the old?

NanoEthics

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 179-181

  Bowman, Diana M ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 53149131307     PISSN: 18714757     EISSN: 18714765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11569-008-0036-9     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. NSW Legislative Council Standing Committee on State Development (2007) New Inquiry into Nanotechnology in NSW. NSW Legislative Council, Sydney
2. Stuart C (2005) Making labor safety a priority and a profit. Small Times November/December:32-33
3. Environmental Defense and DuPont (2007) Nano Risk Framework. Environmental Defense, New York
4. The Innovation Society Ltd and TÜV SÜD (2007) CENARIOSÒ - Managing Nano Risks. The Innovation Society and TÜV SÜD, St. Gallen
5. Friedrichs S (2007) Risk Classification made easy: The NanoSURE Control Banding Scheme. Nanotechnology Industries Association, Cambridge Accessed at: http://www.nanotechia.co.uk/lib/tmp/cmsfiles/File/ NIA_NanoSURE_May2007.pdf
6. BASF (2004) Code of Conduct for Nanotechnology. BASF, Ludwigshafen Accessed at: http://www.corporate.basf.com/en/sustainability/dialog/ nanotechnologie/verhaltenskodex.htm?id=9SYDc8wF5bcp39E
7. European Commission (2008) European Commission adopts Code of Conduct for Responsible Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies Research. EC, Brussels
8. Interessengemeinchaft Detailhandel Schweiz (IG DHS) (2008) Code of Conduct: Nanotechnologies. Swiss Retailers Association, Zurich
9. Friends of the Earth (2006) Nanomaterials, sunscreens and cosmetics: Small ingredients, big risks. Friends of the Earth Australia and Friends of the Earth United States, Melbourne
10. Friends of the Earth (2007) Nanosilver - a threat to soil, water and human health. Friends of the Earth Australia, Melbourne
11. Friends of the Earth (2008) Out of the Laboratory and on To Our Plates: Nanotechnology in Food and Agriculture. Friends of the Earth Australia, Europe and United States, Melbourne
12. International Centre for Technology Assessment (2006) Citizen Petition to the United States Food and Drug Administration. ICTA, Washington, D.C. 16 May
13. Soil Association (2008) Press Release: Soil Association first organisation in the world to ban nanoparticles-potentially toxic beauty products that get right under your skin. SA, Bristol 17 January
14. ETC Group (2006) Nanotech product recall underscores need for nanotech moratorium. ETC Group, Ottawa
15. Bowman D (2008) Rules for nano. Aust R and D Rev March:9
16. Health and Safety Executive (2006) Review of the adequacy of current regulatory regimes to secure effective regulation of nanoparticles created by nanotechnology: The regulations covered by HSE. HSE, London
17. Chaudhry Q, Blackburn J, Floyd P et al (2006) Final Report: A scoping study to identify gaps in environmental regulation for the products and applications of nanotechnologies. Defra, London
18. Food Standards Agency (2006) Draft Report of the FSA Regulatory Review: A Review of the Potential Implications of Nanotechnologies for Regulations and Risk Assessment in Relation to Food. Food Standards Agency, London
19. Taylor MR (2006) Regulating the products of nanotechnology: Does FDA have the tools it needs. Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars, Washington, D.C. Project on Emerging Technologies
20. Davies JC (2006) Managing the effects of nanotechnology. Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars, Washington, D.C. Project on Emerging Technologies
21. Ludlow K, Bowman D, Hodge G (2007) A review of possible impacts of nanotechnology on Australia's regulatory framework. Monash Centre for Regulatory Studies, Monash University, Melbourne