Wetland change mapping for the U.S. mid-Atlantic region using an outlier detection technique

Remote Sensing of Environment

Volumn 112, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 4061-4074

  Nielsen, Eric M ^a   Prince, Stephen D ^a   Koeln, Gregory T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b MDA Federal Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Change detection; Chesapeake Bay; Marsh degradation; Mid Atlantic U.S.; Phragmites australis; Remote sensing; Resistant z score; Wetlands

Indexed keywords

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY; CONFORMAL MAPPING; ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES; LAND USE; LANDFORMS; MAPS; OCEANOGRAPHY; PHOTOGRAPHY; PIXELS; PLANNING; POPULATION STATISTICS; RANDOM PROCESSES; REFLECTION; REMOTE SENSING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SATELLITES; SEA LEVEL; SPACE OPTICS; WATER LEVELS; WETLANDS;

CHANGE DETECTION; CHESAPEAKE BAY; MARSH DEGRADATION; MID-ATLANTIC U.S.; PHRAGMITES AUSTRALIS; RESISTANT Z-SCORE;

PROBABILITY;

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; LAND COVER; OUTLIER; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE DATA; SATELLITE IMAGERY; WETLAND; WETLAND MANAGEMENT;

CHESAPEAKE BAY; MID-ATLANTIC STATES; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

PHRAGMITES AUSTRALIS;

EID: 53149129401     PISSN: 00344257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2008.04.017     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Brinson M.M., and Malvarez A.I. Temperate freshwater wetlands: Types, status, and threats. Environmental Conservation 29 (2002) 115-133
2. Brook R.K., and Kenkel N.C. A multivariate approach to vegetation mapping of Manitoba's Hudson Bay Lowlands. International Journal of Remote Sensing 23 (2002) 4761-4776
3. Cowardin L.M., Carter V., Golet F.C., and LaRoe E.T. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. FWS/OBS-79/31 (1979), U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC 79 pp
4. Crist E.P., and Cicone R.C. A physically-based transformation of Thematic Mapper data: The TM tasseled cap. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 22 (1984) 256-263
5. Dahl T.E. Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States 1998 to 2004 (2006), U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC 112 pp
6. Dobson J.E., Bright E.A., Ferguson R.L., Field D.W., Wood L.L., Haddad K.D., et al. NOAA Coastal Change Analysis Program (C-CAP): Guidance for regional implementation. NOAA technical report NMFS, 123 (1995), U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, DC 92 pp
7. Erwin R.M., Sanders G.M., and Prosser D.J. Changes in lagoonal marsh morphology at selected northeastern Atlantic coast sites of significance to migratory waterbirds. Wetlands 24 (2004) 891-903
8. Freeman E. The presenceabsence package, version 1.0.0 (2007). http://cran.r-project.org Online: http://cran.r-project.org
9. Gibbs J.P. Wetland loss and biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology 14 (2000) 314-317
10. Hansen M., DeFries R.S., Townshend J.R.G., Sohlberg R., Dimiceli C., and Carroll M. Towards an operational MODIS continuous field of percent tree cover algorithm: Examples using AVHRR and MODIS data. Remote Sensing of Environment 83 (2002) 303-319
11. Hartig E.K., Gornitz V., Kolker A., Mushacke F., and Fallon D. Anthropogenic and climate-change impacts on salt marshes of Jamaica Bay, New York City. Wetlands 22 (2002) 71-89
12. Harvey K.R., and Hill G.J.E. Vegetation mapping of a tropical freshwater swamp in the Northern Territory, Australia: A comparison of aerial photography, Landsat TM and SPOT satellite imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing 22 (2001) 2911-2925
13. Houhoulis P.F., and Michener W.K. Detecting wetland change: A rule-based approach using NWI and SPOT-XS data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 66 (2000) 205-211
14. Huang C., Wylie B., Yang L., Homer C., and Zylstra G. Derivation of a tasseled cap transformation based on Landsat 7 at-satellite reflectance (2002), USGS EROS Data Center, Sioux Falls, SD
15. Jain A., Nandakumar K., and Ross A. Score normalization in multimodal biometric systems. Pattern Recognition 38 (2005) 2270-2285
16. Johnston R.M., and Barson M.M. Remote sensing of Australian wetlands: An evaluation of Landsat TM data for inventory and classification. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 44 (1993) 235-252
17. Kauth R.J., and Thomas G.S. The tasseled cap: A graphic description of the spectral-temporal development of agricultural crops as seen by Landsat. Final proceedings: Second international symposium on machine processing of remotely sensed data (1976), Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 41-51
18. Kearney M.S., Rogers A.S., Townshend J.R.G., Rizzo E., Stutzer D., Stevenson J.C., et al. Landsat imagery shows decline of coastal marshes in Chesapeake and Delaware Bays. Eos Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 83 (2002) 173-178
19. Kennish M.J. Environmental threats and environmental future of estuaries. Environmental Conservation 29 (2002) 78-107
20. Koeln G., and Bissonnette J. Cross-correlation analysis: Mapping landcover change with a historic landcover database and a recent, single-date multispectral image. Proceedings of the 2000 ASPRS Annual Convention (2000) 8 pp
21. Koneff M.D., and Royle J.A. Modeling wetland change along the United States Atlantic coast. Ecological Modelling 177 (2004) 41-59
22. Kudray G.M., and Gale M.R. Evaluation of National Wetland Inventory maps in a heavily forested region in the upper Great Lakes. Wetlands 20 (2000) 581-587
23. Leonard L.A., Wren P.A., and Beavers R.L. Flow dynamics and sedimentation in Spartina alterniflora and Phragmites australis marshes of the Chesapeake Bay. Wetlands 22 (2002) 415-424
24. Lu D., Mausel P., Brondízio E., and Moran E. Change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing 25 (2004) 2365-2407
25. Lunetta R.S., and Balogh M.E. Application of multi-temporal Landsat 5 TM imagery for wetland identification. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 65 (1999) 1303-1310
26. McCune B., and Grace J.B. Analysis of ecological communities (2002), MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR 300 pp
27. Morris J.T., Sundareshwar P.V., Nietch C.T., Kjerfve B., and Cahoon D.R. Responses of coastal wetlands to rising sea level. Ecology 83 (2002) 2869-2877
28. Ngu D., Albertson J.D., Blum L.K., and Truitt B. Phragmites distribution in 1996 on the eastern shore of Virginia. Virginia Coast Reserve Long Term Ecological Research Dataset, VCR01070 (1996). http://www.vcrlter.virginia.edu/ Online: http://www.vcrlter.virginia.edu/
29. Ozesmi S.L., and Bauer M.E. Satellite remote sensing of wetlands. Wetlands Ecology and Management 10 (2002) 381-402
30. Pavri F., and Aber J.S. Characterizing wetland landscapes: A spatiotemporal analysis of remotely sensed data at Cheyenne Bottoms, Kansas. Physical Geography 25 (2004) 86-104
31. Ramsey E.W., and Laine S.C. Comparison of Landsat Thematic Mapper and high resolution photography to identify change in complex coastal wetlands. Journal of Coastal Research 13 (1997) 281-292
32. Rogers A.S., and Kearney M.S. Reducing signature variability in unmixing coastal marsh Thematic Mapper scenes using spectral indices. International Journal of Remote Sensing 25 (2004) 2317-2335
33. Rundquist D.C., Narumalani S., and Narayanan R.M. A review of wetlands remote sensing and defining new considerations. Remote Sensing Reviews 20 (2001) 207-226
34. Sader S.A., Ahl D., and Liou W.S. Accuracy of Landsat TM and GIS rule-based methods for forest wetland classification in Maine. Remote Sensing of Environment 53 (1995) 133-144
35. Stolt M.H., and Baker J.C. Evaluation of National Wetland Inventory maps to inventory wetlands in the southern Blue Ridge of Virginia. Wetlands 15 (1995) 346-353
36. Thomas N.E. Monitoring the spread of the aggressive invader, Phragmites australisM.A. scholarly paper (2006), Department of Geography, University of Maryland, College Park, MD
37. Tiner R.W. Trends in the Chesapeake Bay watershed wetlands. In: Mac M.J., Opler P.A., Haeker C.E.P., and Doran P.D. (Eds). Status and trends of the nation's biological resources (1998), U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA 964 pp
38. Tiner R.W. Correlating enhanced National Wetlands Inventory data with wetland functions for watershed assessments: A rationale for northeastern U.S. wetlands (2003), U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Northeast Region, National Wetlands Inventory Program, Hadley, MA 26 pp
39. Tiner R.W., Starr M., Bergquist H., and Swords J. Watershed-based wetland characterization for Maryland's Nanticoke River and Coastal Bays watersheds: A preliminary assessment report (2000), U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Northeast Region, National Wetlands Inventory Program, Hadley, MA 73 pp
40. Tockner K., and Stanford J.A. Riverine flood plains: Present state and future trends. Environmental Conservation 29 (2002) 308-330
41. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Wetlands online mapper (2006). http://wetlandsfws.er.usgs.gov/ Online: http://wetlandsfws.er.usgs.gov/
42. Weber T. Landscape ecological assessment of the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 94 (2004) 39-53
43. Wilen B.O., and Bates M.K. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's National Wetlands Inventory project. Vegetatio 118 (1995) 153-169
44. Zar J.H. Biostatistical analysis. third ed. (1996), Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ 662 pp