Academic planning and organizational design: Lessons from leading American Universities

Higher Education Quarterly

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 35-53

  Dill, David D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 53149123944     PISSN: 09515224     EISSN: 14682273     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.1996.tb01689.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Becher, T. (1989), Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Discipline (Milton Keynes : SRHE and Open University Press).
2. Ben-David, J. (1972), American Higher Education (New York : McGraw-Hill).
3. Benjamin, R., Caroll, S., Jacobi, M., Krop, C. and Shires, M. (1993), The Redesign of Governance in Higher Education (Santa Monica : Rand).
4. Cameron, K. and Tschirhart, M. (1992), ‘Postindustrial Environments and Organizational Effectiveness in Colleges and Universities’, Journal of Higher Education, pp. 87–108.
5. Chaffee, E. E. (1983), ‘The Role of Rationality in University Budgeting’, Research in Higher Education, pp. 387–406.
6. Clark, B. R. (1995), ‘Complexity and Differentiation: The Deepening Problem of University Integration’, In D. D. Dill and B. Sporn (eds.), Emerging Patterns of Social Demand and University Reform: Through a Glass Darkly (Oxford : Pergamon Press).
7. Cohen, M., and March, J. (1986), Leadership and Ambiguity: The American College President (2nd ed.) (Boston : Harvard Business School Press).
8. Dill, D. D. (1982), ‘The Management of Academic Culture: Notes on the Management of Meaning and Social Integration’, Higher Education, pp. 303–320.
9. Dill, D. D., and Friedman, C. (1979), ‘An Analysis of Frameworks for Research on Innovation and Change in Higher Education’, Review of Educational Research, pp. 411–435.
10. Dill, D. D. and Helm, K. P. (1988), ‘Faculty Participation in Strategic Policy Making’. In J. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. 4 (New York : Agathon Press).
11. Dill, D. D. (1994), ‘Rethinking the Planning Process’, Planning for Higher Education, pp. 8–13.
12. Hackman, J. (1985), ‘Power and Centrality in the Allocation of Resources in Colleges and Universities’, Administrative Science Quarterly, pp. 61–77.
13. Herring, C. P., Lemonick, A., McCrudden, C., Schafer, C. and Spies, R. R. (1979), Budgeting and Resource Allocation at Princeton University: Report of a Demonstration Project Supported by the Ford Foundation, 2 (N.J. : Princeton University Press).
14. Heydinger, R. B. (1982). Using Program Priorities to Make Retrenchment Decisions: The Case of the University of Minnesota (Atlanta : Southern Regional Education Board).
15. Lawrence, P. and Lorsch, J. (1986), Organization and Environment (Rev. ed.) (Boston : Harvard Business School Press).
16. Massy, W. F. and Wilger, A. K. (1992), ‘Productivity in Postsecondary Education: A New Approach’, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, pp. 361–376.
17. Mingle, J. R. and Norris, D. M. (1981), ‘Institutional Strategies for Responding to Decline’. In J. R. Mingle (ed.), Challenges of Retrenchment, (San Francisco : Jossey-Bass).
18. Nadler, D. and Tushman, M. (1988), Strategic Organization Design (Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman and Company).
19. Neave, G. (1995), ‘The Stirring of the Prince and the Silence of the Lambs: The Changing Assumptions Beneath Higher Education Policy, Reform, and Society’. In D. D. Dill and B. Sporn (eds.), Emerging Patterns of Social Demand and University Reform: Through a Glass Darkly (Oxford : Pergamon Press).
20. Shirley, R. and Volkwein, J. (1978), ‘Establishing Academic Program Priorities’, Journal of Higher Education, pp. 472–489.
21. Sizer, J. (1982), ‘Institutional Performance Assessments Under Conditions of Changing Needs’, International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education, pp. 17–28.
22. Sizer, J. (1990), ‘Funding Councils and Performance Indicators in Quality Assessment in the United Kingdom’. In L. C. J. Goedegebuure, P. A. M. Maassen, and D. F. Westerheijden (eds.), Peer Review and Performance Indicators (Utrecht : Lemma).
23. Schmidtlein, F. and Milton, T. (1989), ‘College and University Planning: Perspectives from a Nation-Wide Study’, Planning for Higher Education, pp. 1–20.
24. Stanford University(1988) 1988–89 Operating Budget Guidelines (Stanford, CA : Stanford University).
25. Trow, M. A. (1983), ‘Organizing the Biological Sciences at Berkeley’, Change, pp. 28–53.
26. University of Michigan. (1979), Regents Meeting of October. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan.
27. Weick, K. (1976). ‘Educational Organizations as Loosely-Coupled Systems’, Administrative Science Quarterly, pp. 1–19.