Comparing ecosystem goods and services provided by restored and native lands

BioScience

Volumn 58, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 837-845

  Dodds, Walter K ^a   Wilson, Kymberly C ^b   Rehmeier, Ryan L ^c   Knight, G Layne ^d   Wiggam, Shelly ^e   Falke, Jeffrey A ^f   Dalgleish, Harmony J ^g   Bertrand, Katie N ^g  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Arizona Dep of Water Resources   (United States)

^c SIMPSON COLLEGE   (United States)

^d KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT   (United States)

^e Colorado State University ^*

^f UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conservation; Ecosystem goods; Ecosystem services; Ecosystem valuation; Restoration

Indexed keywords

EID: 53149110821     PISSN: 00063568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1641/B580909     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Balmford A, et al. 2002. Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science 297: 950-953.
2. Bockstael NE, Freeman AM, Kopp RJ, Portney PR, Smith VK. 2000. On measuring economic values for nature. Science and Technology 34: 1384-1389.
3. Boesch DF, Brinsfield RB, Magnein RE. 2001. Chesapeake Bay eutrophication: Scientific understanding, ecosystem restoration, and challenges for agriculture. Journal of Environmental Quality 30: 303-320.
4. Claassen R, et al. 2001. Agri-environmental Policy at the Crossroads: Guide-posts on a Changing Landscape. Washington (DC): US Department of Agriculture. USDA Agricultural Economic Report no. 794.
5. Cosgrove S, Niemi E, Fifield A. 2000. The Forests for Their Green: Economic Benefits of Forest Protection, Recreation, and Restoration. Eugene (OR): ECONorthwest.
6. Costanza R, et al. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253-260.
7. Council of Economic Advisors. 1998. The Kyoto Protocol and the President's Policies to Address Climate Change: Administration Economic Analysis. (30 July 2008; http://clinton5.nara.gov/media/pdf/hyoto.pdf)
8. Cox KW, Cintrón G. 1996. An overview of North American wetlands. Chapter 7 in Hails AJ, ed. Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention: The Role of the Convention on Wetlands in the Conservation and Wise Use of Biodiversity. Ahmedabad (India): Ramsar Convention Bureau Ministry of Environment and Forest. (30 July 2008;www.ramsar.org/lib/lib_bio_1.htm)
9. Dodds WK. 2002. Ecology: Concepts and Environmental Applications. San Diego: Academic Press.
10. Goulder LH, Stavins N. 2002. An eye on the future. Nature 419: 673-674.
11. Gowdy J, Erickson J. 2005. Ecological economics at a crossroads. Ecological Economics 53: 17-20.
12. Heimlich R. 2003. Agricultural Resources and Environmental Indicators, 2003. Washington (DC): US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Agriculture Handbook no. AH-722. (4 August 2008; www.ers.usda.gov/ Publications/AREI/AH722/)
13. Heimlich RE, Wiebe KD, Claassen R, Gadsby D, House RM. 1998. Wetlands and Agriculture: Private Interests and Public Benefits. Washington (DC): US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Agricultural Economics Report no. AER765. (4 August 2008; www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/AER765/)
14. Hobbs RJ, Harris JA. 2001. Restoration ecology: Repairing the earth's ecosystems in the new millennium. Ecology 9: 239-246.
15. Kahn JR. 1995. The Economic Approach to Environmental and Natural Resources. Orlando (FL): Harcourt Brace.
16. Leschine TM, Wellman KF, Green TH. 1997. The Economic Value of Wetlands: Wetlands' Role in Flood Protection in Western Washington. Bellevue (WA): Washington State Department of Ecology. Ecology Publication no. 97-100. (30 July 2008; www.ecy.wa.gov/pubs/97100.pdf)
17. Lovich JE, Bainbridge D. 1999. Anthropogenic degradation of the Southern California desert ecosystem and prospects for natural recovery and restoration. Environmental Management 24: 309-326.
18. Madsen J. 1990.On the Osage. Conservancy 5/6: 7-15.
19. [MEA] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2003. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment. Washington (DC): Island Press. (30 July 2008; www.millenniumassessment.org/en/Framework.aspx)
20. _. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current State and Trends. Washington (DC): Island Press. (5 August 2008; www.millenniumassessment.org/ en/Condition.aspx)
21. Moura-Costa P, Stuart M. 1998. Forestry-based greenhouse gas mitigation: A story of market evolution. Forestry Review 77: 191-202.
22. Nabhan GP, Buchmann SL. 1997. Services provided by pollinators. Pages 133-150 in Daily GC, ed. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington (DC): Island Press.
23. Norse EA. 1990. Forests of the Pacific Northwest. Washington (DC): Island Press.
24. Omernik JM. 1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Map (scale 1:7,500,000). Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77: 118-125.
25. Pimentel D, et al. 1995. Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits. Science 267: 1117-1123.
26. Pimentel D, Wilson C, McCullum C, Huang R, Dwen P, Flack J, Tran Q, Saltman T, Cliff B. 1997. Economic and environmental benefits of biodiversity. BioScience 47: 747-757.
27. Schueler TR. 1994. The importance of imperviousness. Watershed Protection Techniques 1: 100-111.
28. Southwick EE, Southwick L Jr. 1992. Estimating the economic value of honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) as agricultural pollinators in the United States. Economic Entomology 85: 621-633.
29. Spash CL, Vatn A. 2006. Transferring environmental value estimates: Issues and alternatives. Ecological Economics 60: 379-388.
30. Sutton PC, Costanza R. 2002. Global estimates of non-market values derived from nighttime satellite imagery, land cover, and ecosystem service valuation. Ecological Economics 41: 509-527.
31. Turner WR, Brandon K, Brooks TM, Costanza R, da Fonseca GAB, Portela R. 2007. Global conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services. BioScience 57: 868-873.
32. [UN et al.] United Nations, European Commission, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, World Bank. 2003. Handbook of National Accounting: Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting 2003. New York: UN et al. Studies in Methods, series F, no. 61, rev. 1.
33. [USDA FS] US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 2001. 1997 RPA Assessment: The United States Forest Resource Current Situation (Final Statistics). Washington (DC): USDA FS.
34. [USDA FSA] US Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency. 2004. Monthly Summary - March 2004: Conservation Reserve Program. (24 July 2008; www.fsa.usda.gov/FSA/webapp?area=home&subject=copr&topic=crp-st)
35. [USDA NRCS] US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. USDA Handbook 296. (4 August 2008; http://soils.usda.gov/survey/geography/mlra)
36. Wali MK, Safaya NM, Evrendilek F. 2002. The Americas: With special reference to the United States of America. Pages 3-31 in Perrow MR, Davy AJ, eds. Handbook of Ecological Restoration, vol. 2: Restoration in Progress. Cambridge (United Kingdom): Cambridge University Press.
37. Wanielista M, Kerstin R, Eaglin R. 1997. Water Quantity and Quality Control. New York: Wiley.
38. World Energy Council. 2004. Energy for Tomorrow's World - Acting Now! World Energy Council Statement 2000. London: World Energy Council.