Dunn's relevant predication, real properties and identity

Erkenntnis

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 37-65

  Kremer, Philip ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 53149108384     PISSN: 01650106     EISSN: 15728420     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1005306200547     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. Anderson, A. R.: 1972, An Intensional Interpretation of Truth Values', Mind 81, 348-371.
2. Anderson, A. R.: 1974, 'Meaning and Implication', Idealistic Studies 4, 79-88.
3. Anderson, A. R. and Belnap, N. D.: 1962, 'Tautological Entailments', Philosophical Studies 13, 9-24.
4. Anderson, A. R. and Belnap, N. D.: 1962a, 'The Pure Calculus of Entailment', Journal of Symbolic Logic 27, 19-52.
5. Anderson, A. R. and Belnap, N. D.: 1975, Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Volume I, Princeton University Press.
6. Anderson, A. R., Belnap, N. D., and Dunn, J. M.: 1992, Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Volume II, Princeton University Press.
7. Angell, R. B.: 1989, 'Deducibility, Entailment and Analytic Containment', Norman and Sylvan 1989, 119-143.
8. Bacon, J.: 1971, 'The Subjunctive Conditional as Relevant Implication', Philosophia 1, 61-80.
9. Barker, J. A.: 1975, 'Relevance Logic, Classical Logic and Disjunctive Syllogism', Philosophical Studies 27, 361-376.
10. Barker, J. A.: 1989, 'Relevance Logic and Inferential Knowledge', Norman and Sylvan 1989, 305-325.
11. Baylis, C. A.: 1931, 'Implication and Subsumption', The Monist 41, 392-399.
12. Bealer, G.: 1982, Quality and Concept, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
13. Belnap, N. D.: 1960, 'Entailment and Relevance', The Journal of Symbolic Logic 25, 144-146.
14. Belnap, N. D.: 1977, A Useful Four-Valued Logic', in J. M. Dunn and G. Epstein (eds.), Modern Uses of Multiple-Valued Logic, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, pp. 8-37.
15. Belnap, N. D. and Dunn, J. M.: 1981, 'Entailment and the Disjunctive Syllogism', in G. Fløistad and G. H. von Wright, (eds.), Philosophy of Language/Philosophical Logic, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp. 337-366.
16. Boolos, G.: 1971, 'The Iterative Conception of a Set', Journal of philosophy 68, 215-232.
17. Bradley, F. H.: 1893, Appearance and Reality: A Metaphysical Essay, Swann Sonnenschein & Co. Ltd, London. Second edition, revised, 1897.
18. Burgess, J. P.: 1983, 'Common Sense and Relevance', Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 24, 41-53.
19. Burgess, J. P.: 1984, 'Read on Relevance: a Rejoinder', Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 25, 217-223.
20. Church, A.: 1956, Introduction to Mathematical Logic, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
21. Copeland, B. J.: 1984, 'Horseshoe, Hook and Relevance', Theoria 50, 148-164.
22. Curley, E. M.: 1972, 'Lewis and Entailment', Philosophical Studies 23, 198-204.
23. Diaz, M. R.: 1981, Topics in the Logic of Relevance, Analytica, Berlin and New York.
24. Duncan-Jones, A. E.: 1935, 'Is Strict Implication the Same as Entailment?', Analysis 2, 70-78.
25. Dunn, J.M.: 1986, 'Relevant Logic and Entailment', in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Volume III: Alternatives to Classical Logic, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, pp. 117-229.
26. Dunn, J. M.: 1987, 'Relevant Predication 1: The Formal Theory', Journal of Philosophical Logic 16, 347-381. Reprinted in Anderson, Belnap and Dunn 1992, §74, pp. 445-471 Page and section references are to this reprinting.
27. Dunn, J. M.: 1990, 'The Frame Problem and Relevant Predication', in H. Kyburg, R. Loui and C. Carlson, (eds.), Knowledge, Representation and Defeasible Reasoning, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 108-116.
28. Dunn, J. M.: 1990a, 'Relevant Predication 2: Intrinsic Properties and Internal Relations', Philosophical Studies 60, 177-206.
29. Dunn, J. M.: 1990b, 'Relevant Predication 3: Essential Properties', in J. M. Dunn and A. Gupta, (eds.), Truth or Consequences: Essays in Honor of Nuel Belnap, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 77-95.
30. Dunn, J. M.: 199+, 'A Logical Framework for the Notion of Natural Property', manuscript.
31. Dunn, J. M.: 199+a, 'Is Existence a (Relevant) Predicate?', manuscript.
32. Epstein, R. L.: 1979, 'Relatedness and Implication', Philosophical Studies 36, 137-173.
33. Epstein, R. L.: 1981, 'Relatedness and Dependence in Propositional Logics', The Journal of Symbolic Logic 46, 202.
34. Fitch, F. B.: 1952, Symbolic Logic: An Introduction, The Ronald Press Co., New York.
35. Fodor, J. A.: 1987, 'Modules, Frames, Fridgeons, Sleeping Dogs, and the Music of the Spheres', in Z. W. Plyshyn, (ed.), The Robot's Dilemma, Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NI., pp. 139-149.
36. Freeman, J. B.: 1989, 'Quantification, Identity, and Opacity in Relevance Logic', in Norman and Sylvan 1989, pp. 305-316.
37. Gardenfors, P.: 1978, 'On the Logic of Relevance', Synthese 37, 251-367.
38. Geach, P.: 1969, God and the Soul, Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd., London.
39. Goodman, N.: 1955, Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. Fourth edition, revised, The Bobbs-Merrill Co., Inc., Indianapolis 1983.
40. Hamilton, E. and Cairns, H. (eds.): 1961, The Collected Dialogues of Plato, Bollingen Foundation, New York.
41. Henkin, L.: 1950, 'Completeness in the Theory of Types', Journal of Symbolic Logic 15, 81-91.
42. Hockney, D. J.: 1968, A Vindication of System E', Logique et Analyse 11, 480-491.
43. Hockney, D. J. and Wilson, J. C.: 1965, 'In Defense of a Relevance Condition', Logique et Analyses, 211-220.
44. Iseminger, G.: 1980, 'Is Relevance Necessary for Validity?', Mind 89, 73-88.
45. Köningsveld, H.: 1973, 'What Does 'p entails c' Mean?', Mind 82, 118-122.
46. Kremer, P.: 1989, 'Relevant Predication: Grammatical Characterisations', Journal of Philosophical Logic 18, 349-382.
47. Kremer, P.: 1994, Real Properties, Relevance Logic and Identity, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.
48. Lavers, P.: 1988. 'Relevance and Disjunctive Syllogism', Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 29, 34-44.
49. Lewis, D. K.: 1988, 'Relevant Implication', Theoria 54, 162-174.
50. Meyer, R. K.: 1968, 'Entailment and Relevant Implication', Logique et Analyse 11, 472-479.
51. Meyer, R. K.: 1971, 'Entailment', Journal of Philosophy 68, 808-818.
52. Meyer, R. K.: 197+, Arithmetic Relevantly Formulated', unpublished manuscript.
53. Moore, G. E.: 1919, 'External and Internal Relations', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 1919-20.
54. Reprinted in Philosophical Studies, Harcourt, Brace and Co. Inc., New York.
55. Myhill, J.: 1989, 'Real Implication', in Norman and Sylvan 1989, pp. 157-165.
56. Nelson, E. J.: 1930, Intensional Relations', Mind 39, 440-453.
57. Norman, J. and Sylvan, R. (eds.): 1989, Directions in Relevant Logic, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
58. Palmer, H.: 1982, 'Revisionary Ifs', Erkenntnis 17, 249-261.
59. Parks-Clifford, J. E.: 1989, 'Literal Relevance', in Norman and Sylvan 1989, pp. 59-75.
60. Pegis, A. C. (trans): 1945, The Basic Writings of St. Thomas Aquinas (two volumes), Random House, New York.
61. Prawitz, D.: 1964, 'Normal Deductions', Journal of Symbolic Logic 29, 152.
62. Priest, G. and Crosthwaite, J.: 1989, 'Relevance, Truth and Meaning', in Norman and Sylvan 1989, pp. 377-397.
63. Read, S.: 1988, Relevant Logic, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
64. Rice, H.: 1986, 'Entailment', Mind 95, 345-360.
65. Routley, R.: 1984, 'Relevantism, Material Detachment, and the Disjunctive Syllogism Argument', Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14, 167-188.
66. Urquhart, A.: 1972, 'A General Theory of Implication', The Journal of Symbolic Logic 37, 443.
67. Urquhart, A.: 1989, 'What is Relevant Implication?', in Norman and Sylvan 1989, pp. 167-174.
68. van Dijk, T. A.: 1989, '"Relevance" in Logic and Grammar', in Norman and Sylvan 1989, pp. 25-57.
69. Wolf, R. G.: 1978, Are Relevant Logics Deviant?', Philosophia 7, 327-340.
70. Woods, J.: 1967, 'Is There a Relation of Intensional Conjunction?', Mind 76, 357-368.
71. Woods, J.: 1969, 'Intensional Relations', Studia Logica 25, 61-73.