Cartwright on fundamental laws: A response to Clarke

Australasian Journal of Philosophy

Volumn 74, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 150-152

  Chalmers, Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 53149106262     PISSN: 00048402     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00048409612347121     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. N. Cartwright, How the Laws of Physics Lie (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983)
2. N. Cartwright, Nature's Capacities and Their Measurement (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989)
3. N. Cartwright, 'Is Natural Science "Natural" Enough? A Reply to Phillip Allport', Synthese 94 (1993) pp. 291-301
4. A. Chalmers, 'Bhaskar, Cartwright and Realism in Physics', Methodology and Science 20 (1987) pp. 77-96
5. A. Chalmers, 'So the Laws of Physics Needn't Lie', Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (1993) pp. 196-205
6. S. Clarke, 'The Lies Remain the Same. A Reply to Chalmers', Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73 (1995) pp. 152-155