Classification of proteins based on similarity of two-dimensional protein maps

Biophysical Chemistry

Volumn 138, Issue 1-2, 2008, Pages 11-22

  Albrecht, Birgit ^a   Grant, Guy H ^b   Sisu, Cristina ^b   Richards, W Graham ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Classification; Function prediction; Protein kinases; Protein similarity; Two dimensional maps

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE; PROTEIN KINASE;

ARTICLE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SCORING SYSTEM;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHOSPHOTRANSFERASES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN;

EID: 53149087021     PISSN: 03014622     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpc.2008.08.004     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Berman H., Westbrook J., Feng Z., Gilliland G., Bhat T., Weissing H., Shindyalov I., and Bourne P. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Research 28 (2000) 235-242
2. Orengo C., Michie A., Jones S., Jones D., Swindells M., and Thornton J. CATH - a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure 5 (1997) 1093-1108
3. Cheek S., Ginalski K., Zhang H., and Grishin N. A comprehensive update of the sequence and structure classification of kinases. BMC Structural Biology 5 (2005) 6
4. Murzin A., Brenner S., Hubbard T., and Chothia C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequence and structures. Journal of Molecular Biology 247 (1995) 536-540
5. Finn R., Mistry J., Schuster-Bockler B., Griffiths-Jones S., Hollich V., Lassmann T., Moxon S., Marshall M., Khanna A., Durbin R., Eddy S., Sonnhammer E., and Bateman A. Pfam: clans, web tools and services. Nucleic Acids Research 34 (2006) D247-D251
6. Holm L., and Sander C. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. Journal of Molecular Biology 233 (1993) 123-138
7. Holm L., and Park J. DaliLite workbench for protein structure comparison. Bioinformatics 16 (2000) 566-567
8. Albrecht B., Grant G., and Richards W. Evaluation of structural similarity based on reduced dimensionality representations of protein structure. Protein Engineering, Design and Selection 17 (2004) 425-432
9. Jones S., and Thornton J. Searching for functional sites in protein structures. Current Opinions in Chemical Biology 8 (2004) 3-7
10. Todd A., Orengo C., and Thornton J. Evolution of function in protein superfamilies from a structural perspective. Journal of Molecular Biology 307 (2001) 1113-1143
11. Hanks S., and Quinn A. Protein kinase catalytic domain sequence database: identification of conserved features of primary structure and classification of family members. Methods in Enzymology 200 (1991) 38-62
12. Hanks S., and Hunter T. The eukaryotic protein kinase superfamily: kinase (catalytic) domain structure and classification. FASEB 9 (1995) 576-596
13. Naumann T., and Matter H. Structural classification of protein kinases using 3d molecular interaction field analysis of their ligand binding sites: target family landscapes. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 45 (2002) 2366-2378
14. Cheek S., Zhang H., and Grishin N. Sequence and structure classification of kinases. Journal of Molecular Biology 320 (2002) 855-881
15. Allen B., Grant G., and Richards W. Similarity calculations using two-dimensional molecular representations. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences 41 (2001) 330-337
16. Metropolis N., and Ulam S. The Monte Carlo method. Journal of the American Statistical Association 44 (1949) 335-341
17. Cassia-Moura R., Sousa C., Ramos A., Coelho L., and Valenca M. Yet another application of the Monte Carlo method for modeling in the field of biomedicine. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 78 (2005) 223-235
18. Good A., and Richards W. Rapid evaluation of shape similarity using Gaussian functions. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences 33 (1993) 112-116
19. Burt C., and Richards W. The application of molecular similarity calculations. Journal of Computational Chemistry 11 (1990) 1139-1146
20. Niefind K., and Schomburg D. Amino acid similarity coefficients for protein modeling and sequence alignment derived from main-chain folding angles. Journal of Molecular Biology 219 (1991) 481-497
21. Riek P., Handschumacher M., Sung S.-S., Tan M., Glynias M., Schluchter M., Novotny J., and Graham R. Evolutionary conservation of both the hydrophilic and hydrophobic nature of transmembrane residues. Journal of Theoretical Biology 172 (1995) 245-258
22. Hodgkin E., and Richards W. Molecular similarity base on electrostatic potential and electric field. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry. Quantum Biology Symposium 14 (1987) 105-110
23. Carbo R., Leyda L., and Arnau M. How similar is a molecule to another? An electron density measure of similarity between two molecular structures. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 17 (1980) 1185-1189
24. Smith C., Shindyalov I., Veretnik S., Gribskov M., Taylor S., ten Eyck L., and Bourne P. The protein kinase resource. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 22 (1997) 444-446. http://www.kinasenet.org/pkr URL http://www.kinasenet.org/pkr
25. Larkin M., Blackshields G., Brown N., Chenna R., McGettigan P., McWillam H., Valentin F., Wallace I., Wilm A., Lopez R., Thompson J., Gibson T., and Higgins D. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23 (2007) 2947-2948
26. Ortiz A.R., Strauss C., and Olmea O. MAMMOTH (matching molecular models obtained from theory): an automated method for model comparison. Protein Science 11 (2002) 2606-2621
27. Zhang Y., and Skolnick J. TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Research 33 (2005) 2302-2309
28. Hornik K. The R FAQ (2008). http://CRAN.R-project.org/doc/FAQ/R-FAQ.html URL http://CRAN.R-project.org/doc/FAQ/R-FAQ.html