Child toothbrush abrasion effect on ionomeric materials

Journal of Dentistry for Children

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 112-116

  Carvalho, Fabíola G ^a   Fucio, Suzana B P ^a   Paula, Andréia B ^a   Correr, Gisele Maria ^a   Sinhoreti, Mario A C ^a   Puppin Rontani, Regina M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Glass ionomer cement; Surface roughness; Tooth brushing abrasion

Indexed keywords

GLASS IONOMER; RESIN CEMENT; TOOTHPASTE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVALUATION; HUMAN; HUMIDITY; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPERATURE; TIME; TOOTH BRUSHING;

DENTAL POLISHING; DENTIFRICES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; HUMIDITY; MATERIALS TESTING; RESIN CEMENTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS; TOOTHBRUSHING;

EID: 53049101041     PISSN: 15518949     EISSN: 19355068     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Comparative physicomechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J Dent Res 1997;76:883-94.
2. Momoi Y, Hirosaki K, Kohno A, McCabe JF. In vitro toothbrush-dentifrice abrasion of resin-modified glass ionomers. Dent Mater 1997;13:82-8.
3. Xie D, Brantley WA, Culbertson BM, Wang G. Mechanical properties and microstructures of glassionomer cements. Dent Mater 2000;16:129-38.
4. Croll TP, Nicholson JW. Glass ionomer cements in pediatric dentistry: Review of the literature. Pediatr Dent 2002;24:423-9.
5. Peutzfeldt A, García-Godoy F, Asmussen E. Surface hardness and wear of glass ionomers and compomers. Am J Dent 1997;10:15-7.
6. Mitra SB, Kedrowski BL. Long-term mechanical properties of glass ionomers. Dent Mater 1994;10:78-82.
7. Ellakuria J, et al. Effect of 1-year water storage on the surface microhardness of resin-modified versus conventional glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater 2003; 19:286-90.
8. De Gee AJ, van Duinen RNB, Davidson CL. Early and long-term wear of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomers. J Dent Res 1996;75:1613-9.
9. Rios D, Honório HM, Araújo PA, Machado MAAM. Wear and superficial roughness of glass ionomer cements used as sealants after simulated tooth-brushing. Pesqui Odontol Bras 2002;16:343-8.
10. Davis WB. The cleansing, polishing, and abrasion of teeth and dental products. J Cosmet Sci 1978;1:39-81.
11. Dyer D, Addy M, Newcombe RG. Studies in vitro of abrasion by different manual toothbrush heads and a standard toothpaste. J Clin Periodontol 2000;27:99-103.
12. Dyer D, MacDonald E, Newcombe RG, Scratcher C, Ley F, Addy M. Abrasion and stain removal by different manual toothbrushes and brush actions: Studies in vitro. J Clin Periodontol 2001;28:121-7.
13. Iwami Y, Yamamoto H, Hawai K, Torii M, Tsuchitani Y. The study on toothbrush abrasion of various filling restorative materials. Part 1. Effects of storage condition on toothbrush abrasion test of restoratives. Jpn J Conserv Dent 1994;37:788-801.
14. Frazier KB, Rueggeberg FA, Mettenburg DJ. Comparison of wear-resistance of Class V restorative materials. J Esthet Dent 1998;10:309-14.
15. Yap AUJ. Postirradiation hardness of resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a polyacid-modified composite resin. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1997;8:413-6.