Intersecting communities of practice in distance education: The program team and the online course community

Distance Education

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 289-306

  Correia, Ana Paula ^a   Davis, Niki ^b  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Community of practice; Graduate education; Identity; Online learning community

Indexed keywords

EID: 52949138982     PISSN: 01587919     EISSN: 14750198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01587910802395813     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Barab, S., & Duffy, T. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. Jonassen & S.M. Land, Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 25-56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Chinnappan, M. (2006). Using the productive pedagogies framework to build a community of learners online in mathematics education. Distance Education, 27(3), 355-369.
3. Clandinin, D., & Connelly, F. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Correia, A.P. (2008a). Moving from theory to real-world experiences in an e-learning community. Innovate, 4(4). Retrieved May 12, 2008, from http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=495
5. Correia, A.P. (2008b). Team conflict in ICT-rich environments: Roles of technologies in conflict management. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 18-35.
6. Davis, N.E. (2003). Technology and teacher education in the USA: What makes for good sustainable practice? Technology, Pedagogy and Learning, 12(1), 59-84.
7. Davis, N.E. (in press). How may teacher learning be promoted for educational renewal with IT? In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in education. Amsterdam: Kluwer Press.
8. Davis, N.E., & Michelini, C. (2006). Curriculum and instructional technology masters: Outreach improves practice on-site. Showcase session presented at !Impact 2006: Eighth Annual WebCT User Conference, Chicago, IL.
9. Davis, N.E., & Niederhauser, D.S. (2005). Socio-cultural analysis of two cases of distance learning in secondary education. Education and Information Technologies, 10(3), 249-262.
10. Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1998). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (pp. 195-220). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Harms, C.M., Niederhauser, D.S., Davis, N.E., Roblyer, M.D., & Gilbert, S.B. (2006). Educating educators for virtual schooling: Communicating roles and responsibilities [Electronic version]. Electronic Journal of Communication, 16(1/2).
12. Henri, F., & Pudelko, B. (2003). Understanding and analysing activity and learning in virtual communities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(4), 472-487.
13. Hlapanis, G., & Dimitracopoulou, A. (2007). The school-teacher's learning community: Matters of communication analysis. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 16(2), 127-131.
14. Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1985). Classroom conflict: Controversy versus debate in learning groups. American Educational Research Journal, 22(2), 237-256.
15. Larramendy-Joerns, J., & Leinhardt, G. (2006). Going the distance with online education. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 567-605.
16. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
17. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18. Lynch, M.L. (2002). The online educator: A guide to creating the virtual classroom. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
19. Mackey, J. (2006). Proposal: Connections between teachers' online professional development and their communities of practice. Unpublished PhD proposal submitted to Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
20. Moore, M. (Ed.). (2007). Handbook of distance education (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Natriello, G. (2005). Modest changes, revolutionary possibilities: Distance learning and the future of education. Teachers College Record, 107(8), 1885-1904.
22. Poole, M., Holmes, M., & DeSanctis, G. (1991). Conflict management in a computer-supported meeting environment. Management Science, 37(8), 926-953.
23. Riopelle, K., Gluesing, J., Alcordo, T., Baba, M., Britt, D., McKether, W., et al. (2003). Context, task and the evolution of technology use in global virtual teams. In C.B. Gibson & S.G. Cohen (Eds.), Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness (pp. 239-264). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24. Salmon, G. (2005). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
25. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
26. Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27. Stacey, E., Smith, PJ., & Barty, K. (2004). Adult learners in the workplace: Online learning and communities of practice. Distance Education, 25(1), 107-123.
28. Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Thompson, A.D., Chuang, H.H., & Sahin, I. (Eds.). (2007). Faculty mentoring: The power of students in developing technology expertise. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
30. Tu, C., & Corry, M. (2001). A paradigm, shift for online community research. Distance Education: An international Journal, 22(2), 245-263.
31. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.