Review of techniques for magnetic storm forecasting

Geophysical Monograph Series

Volumn 98, Issue , 1996, Pages 253-266

  Detman, Thomas R ^a   Vassiliadis, Dimitris ^b  

^a NOAA EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITIES SPACE RESEARCH ASSOCIATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 52949133631     PISSN: 00658448     EISSN: 23288779     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1029/GM098p0253     Document Type: Chapter

References (54)

1. Abarbanel, H.D.I., R. Brown, and J.J. Sidorowhich, The analysis of observed chaotic data in physical systems, Rev. Mod Phys., 65, 1331, 1993.
2. Akaike, H., Use of an information theoretic quantity for statistical model identification, Proc. 5th Hawaii Int. Conf on System Sciences, 1972.
3. Akaike, H., A new look at statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control AC-19, 1974.
4. Akasofu, S.-L, and CF Fry, A First Generation Numerical Geomagnetic Storm Prediction Scheme, Planet. Space Sci., 34, 77-92, 1986.
5. Baker, D.N., Statistical Analysis in the Study of Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Coupling, in Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Coupling, edited by Y. Kamide and JA. Slavin, 17-38, Terra Scientific Publishing Co., 1986.
6. Bargatze, L.F., D.N. Baker, R.L. McPherron, and E.W Hones Jr.. Magnetospheric impulse response for many levels of geomagnetic activity, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 6387, 1985.
7. Boteler, D.H., Geomagnetic effects on power systems, this volume.
8. Brooks, H.E., and CA. Doswell, A comparison between measures-oriented and distributions-oriented verification methods in forecast verification, Weather and Forecasting, 11, in press, 1996.
9. Broomhead, D.S., J.P. Huke, and M.R. Muldoon, Linear filters and Non-linear systems, J. R. Statist. Soc. B, 54, 373-382, 1992.
10. Burton, R.K., R.L. McPherron, and C.T. Russell, An empirical relationship between interplanetary conditions and Dst, J. Geophys. Res., 80, 4204-4214, 1975.
11. Campbell, Charles P., Ethos: Character and Ethics in Technical Writing, IEEE Trans, on Professional Communication 38, 132, 1995.
12. Casdagli, M., Chaos and deterministic versus stochastic non-linear modelling, J. R. Statist. Soc. B, 54, 203, 1991.
13. Casdagli, M., A dynamical systems approach to modeling input-output systems, in Nonlinear Modeling and Forecasting, edited by Casdagli, M. and S. Eubank, Addison-Wesley, 1992.
14. Chen, J., P.J. Cargill, and P. Palmadesso, Real-Time Prediction of Magnetic Storms, J. Geophys. Res, Special Section on Magnetic Storms (submitted) 1996.
15. Clauer C.R., The Technique of Linear Prediction Filters Applied to Studies of Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Coupling in Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Coupling, edited by Y. Kamide and J. A. Slavin, 39-57, Terra Scientific Publishing Co., 1986.
16. Detman, T., D. Vassiliadis, and G. Burkhart, Application of the State-Space Method to Prediction of Dst from Solar Wind Data and Characterization of Ring Current Dynamics, IUGG XXI General Assembly, Abstracts WeekB, GAB32E-11, 1995.
17. DeVore, C.R., N.R. Sheeley Jr., and J.P. Boris, The concentration of the large-scale solar magnetic field by a meridional surface flow, Sol Phys., 92, 1,1984.
18. Dryer, M., S.-I. Akasofu, H.W. Kroehl, R. Sagalyn, S.T. Wu, T F. Tascione, and Y. Kamide, The solar/interplanetary/ magnetosphere/ionosphere connection: a strategy for prediction of geomagnetic storms, Adv. Astro. Sci., 58, 1986.
19. Fay, R.A., C.R. Garrity, R.L. McPherron, and L.F. Bargatze, Prediction Filters for the Dst Index and Polar Cap Potential, in Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Coupling, edited by Y. Kamide and J. A. Slavin, 111-117, Terra Scientific Publishing Co., 1986.
20. Feldstein, Y.I., V. YU. Pisarsky, N.M. Rudneva, and A. Grafe, Ring Current Simulation in Connection with Interplanetary Space Conditions, Planet. Space Sci, 32, 975-984, 1984.
21. Garcia, P., J. Jimenez, A. Marcano, and F Moleiro, Local optimal metrics and nonlinear modeling of chaotic time series, Phys. Rev. Lett, 76, 9, 1449-1452, 1996.
22. Gehred, P. A, Wang and Sheeley medium-range planetary A index forecast verification statistics, NOAA Technical Memorandum ERLSEL-91, Space Environment Center, Boulder, CO, 1996.
23. Gonzalez, W. D., A unified view of solar wind-magnetosphere coupling functions, Planet. Space Sci., 38, 627-632, 1990.
24. Heinemann, M., N.C. Maynard, D.N. Anderson, and F. Marcos, Space Weather Forecasting System, in Solar-Terrestrial Predictions-IV, Proceedings of a Workshop at Ottawa, Canada, May 18-22, 1992, Vol. 2, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Environmental Research Laboratories, Boulder, CO. 1993.
25. lyemori, Toshihiko, Hiroshi Maeda, and Toyohisa Kamei, Impulse Response of Geomagnetic Indices to Interplanetary Magnetic Field, J. Geomag. Geoelectr, 31, 1-9, 1979.
26. Kappenman, J.G., and W. A. Radasky, The impact of geomagnetic disturbances on electric power systems and geomagnetic forecast improvements needed of the electric utility industry, this volume. Kanter, M., Lower bounds for nonlinear prediction error in moving-average processes, Ann. Probability, 7, 2, 128-138, 1979.
27. Klimas, A.J., D.N. Baker, and D. Vassiliadis, The organized nonlinear dynamics of the magnetosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 13,089, 1996.
28. Lundstedt, H., Al techniques in geomagnetic storm forecasting, this volume. Marshall, K.T., and R. M. Oliver, Decision Making and Forecasting, 407 pp., New York, NY, McGraw-Hill, 1995.
29. McPherron, R.L., D.N. Baker, and L.F Bargatze, Linear Filters as a Method of Real Time Prediction of Geomagnetic Activity, in Solar Wind Magnetosphere Coupling, edited by Y. Kamide and J.A. Slavin, 85-92, Terra Scientific Publishing Co., 1986.
30. McPherron, R.L., Monitoring the solar wind with the Dst index, Eos Trans. AGU, 76, 17, S206, 1995.
31. Murayama, T., Coupling Function between the Solar Wind and the Dst Index, in Solar Wind Magnetosphere Coupling, edited by Y. Kamide and J.A. Slavin, 119-126, Terra Scientific Publishing Co., 1986.
32. Murphy A.H., Forecast Verification, in Economic Value of Weather and Climate Forecasts, edited by R.W Katz and A.H. Murphy Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., in press, 1996.
33. Murphy A.H., and H. Daan, Forecast evaluation, in Probability, Statistics and Decision Making in the Atmospheric Sciences, edited by A. H. Murphy and R.W. Katz, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1985.
34. Murphy A.H. and R.L. Winkler, A general framework for forecast verification, Mon. Wea. Rev., 115, 1330-1338, 1987.
35. Press, W. H., B.P. Flannery, S.A. Teukolsky, and W. T. Vettering, Numerical recipes, the Art of Scientific Computing (FORTRAN Version), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK., 52-64, 1992.
36. Price, CP., and D. Prichard, The nonlinear response of the magnetosphere: 30 October 1978, Geophys. Res. Lett, 20, 111, 1993.
37. Price, CP., D. Prichard, and J.E. Bischoff, Non-linear input-output analysis of the auroral electrojet index, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 13,227, 1994.
38. Reiff, P.H., The use and misuse of statistical analysis, in Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Eds. R.L. Caravillano and J.M. Forbes, D. Reidel, 1983.
39. Russell, C.T., and R.L. McPherron, Semiannual variation of geomagnetic activity, J. Geophys. Res., 78, 92, 1973.
40. Sauer, T., J.A. Yorke and M. Casdagli, Embedology, J. Stat. Phys., 65, 3-4,1991.
41. Shepp, L.A., D. Slepian, and A.D. Wyner, On prediction of moving-average processes, The Bell System Technical Journal, 59, 3, 367-415, 1980.
42. Takens, F., Detecting Strange Attractors in Turbulence, in Dynamical Systems and Turbulence, edited by A. Dold and B. Eckmann Lecture Notes in Mathematics 898, 366-381, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1981.
43. Trattner, K. J., and H.O. Rucker, Linear Prediction Theory in Studies of Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Coupling, Ann. Geophysicae 8, 733-738, 1990.
44. Ulrych, T.J., and R.W. Clayton, Time series modeling and maximum entropy, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 12, 188-200, 1976.
45. Valdivia, J.A., A.S. Sharma, and K. Papadopoulos, Dynamics and prediction of magnetospheric storms, Eos. Trans. AGU Supplement, 75, 44, S544, 1994.
46. Valdivia, J.A., AS. Sharma, and K Papadopoulos, Prediction of Magnetospheric Storms by Nonlinear Dynamical Models, Geophys. Res. Lett, (accepted) 1996.
47. Vassiliadis, D., The input-state space approach to the prediction of auroral geomagnetic activity from solar wind variables, in Proceedings of the International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Solar Terrestrial Physics, edited by Joselyn, J. and H. Lundstedt and J. Trolinger, NOAA, Boulder, 145-151, 1994.
48. Vassiliadis, D., A.J. Klimas, D.N. Baker and D.A. Roberts, A description of solar wind magnetosphere coupling based on nonlinear filters, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 3, 3495, 1995.
49. Vassiliadis, D., A.J. Klimas, D.N. Baker and D.A. Roberts, Nonlinear predictor error for the vBz-AL coupling, J. Geophys. Res., 100 3495, 1996.
50. Vassiliadis D., A.J. Klimas, and D.N. Baker, Nonlinear ARMA Models for the Dst Index and their Physical Interpretation, in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Substorms (ICS-3), Versailles, France, May 13-17,1996.
51. Wang Y.-M., and N.R. Sheeley Jr.,The solar origin of long-term variations of the interplanetary magnetic field strength, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 11,227, 1988.
52. Wang Y.-M., and N.R. Sheeley Jr., Solar wind speed and coronal flux-tube expansion, Astrophys. J., 355, 726, 1990.
53. Weigend, A., and N. Gershenfeld, Time Series Prediction, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1994.
54. Yule, G., On a method of investigation periodicity in disturbed series with special reference to Wolfer’s sunspot numbers, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, A 226, 1927.