Mars' paleomagnetic field as the result of a single-hemisphere dynamo

Science

Volumn 321, Issue 5897, 2008, Pages 1822-1825

  Stanley, Sabine ^a   Elkins Tanton, Linda ^b   Zuber, Maria T ^b   Parmentier, E Marc ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAGNETIC FIELD; MARS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PALEOMAGNETISM; SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE;

ARTICLE; ASTRONOMY; COSMOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; HEAT TRANSFER; MAGNETIC FIELD; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 52949109771     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1161119     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. M. H. Acuna et al., Science 284, 790 (1999).
2. B. Langlais, M. E. Purucker, M. Mandea, J. Geophys. Res. 109, E02008 (2004).
3. B. P. Weiss et al., Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 201, 449 (2002).
4. L. A. Edgar, H. V. Frey, Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L02201 (2008).
5. M. T. Zuber et al., Science 287, 1788 (2000).
6. S. C. Solomon et al., Science 307, 1214 (2005) and references therein.
7. H. V. Frey, J. Geophys. Res. 111, E08S91 (2006).
8. S. Zhong, M. T. Zuber, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 189, 75 (2001).
9. J. H. Roberts, S. Zhong, J. Geophys. Res. 111, E06013 (2006).
10. L. T. Elkins-Tanton, E. M. Parmentier, P. C. Hess, Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 38, 1753 (2003).
11. L. T. Elkins-Tanton, S. E. Zaranek, E. M. Parmentier, P. C. Hess, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 236, 1 (2005).
12. Y. Ke, V. S. Solomatov, J. Geophys. Res. 111, E10001 (2006).
13. D. E. Wilhelms, S. W. Squyres, Nature 309, 138 (1984).
14. H. Frey, R. A. Shultz, Geophys. Res. Lett. 15, 229 (1988).
15. F. Nimmo, M. S. Gilmore, J. Geophys. Res. 106, 12315 (2001).
16. T. R. Watters, P. J. McGovern, R. P. Irwin III, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 35, 621 (2007).
17. J. C. Andrews-Hanna, M. T. Zuber, W. B. Banerdt, Nature 453, 1212 (2008).
18. W. A. Watters, M. T. Zuber, B. H. Hager, J. Geophys. Res., in press.
19. W. Kuang, J. Bloxham, Nature 389, 371 (1997).
20. W. Kuang, J. Bloxham, J. Comput. Phys. 153, 51 (1999).
21. Additional information on the numerical methods is available as supporting material on Science Online.
22. E. Grote, F. H. Busse, Phys. Rev. E 62, 4457 (2000).
23. G. A. Glatzmaier, R. S. Coe, L. Hongre, P. H. Roberts, Nature 401, 885 (1999).
24. M. Kono, P. H. Roberts, Rev. Geophys. 40, 1013 (2002).
25. Y. Quesnel, B. Langlais, C. Sotin, Planet. Space Sci. 55, 258 (2007), and references therein.
26. B. Langlais, M. Purucker, Planet. Space Sci. 55, 270 (2007); and references therein.
27. K. F. Sprenke, L. L. Baker, A. F. Williams, Icarus 174, 486 (2005); and references therein.
28. A. Daradich et al., Icarus 194, 463 (2008).
29. J. T. Perron, J. X. Mitrovica, M. Manga, I. Matsuyama, M. A. Richards, Nature 447, 840 (2007).
30. V. Dehant et al., Space Sci. Rev. 129, 279 (2007).
31. Y. N. Kulikov et al., Space Sci. Rev. 129, 207 (2007).
32. S.S. is partially funded by the National Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada. The numerical simulations in this study were performed on supercomputing resources partially funded by the Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI) and the Ontario Research Fund (ORF).