Long-term water resource management in semi-arid areas: A South African case study

International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 161-179

  De Lange, W J ^a   Kleynhans, T E ^b  

^a Future production Chemicals Cluster   (South Africa)

^b STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Decision support; Public participation; Water management

Indexed keywords

EID: 52949109209     PISSN: 17437601     EISSN: 1743761X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2495/SDP-V3-N2-161-179     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Carmichael, S.S., Forsyth, D. & Hughes, D.A., Decision Support System for the Development of Rural Water Supply Schemes, Report no. 837/1/01, Water Research Commission: Pretoria, 2001.
2. Bush, D.B., Martin, W.E. & Brown, T.C., Do water market prices appropriately measure water values? Natural Resource Journal, 27(3), pp. 617-651, 1987.
3. Dudley, N.J., Water allocation by markets, common property and capacity-sharing: companions or competitors? Natural Resources Journal, 32(4), pp. 757-778, 1992.
4. Colby, B.G., Crandall, K. & Bush, D.B., Water right transactions: market values and price dispersion. Water Resources Research, 29(6), pp. 1565-1572, 1993.
5. Fishelson, G., The water market in Israel: an example for increasing the supply. Resource and Energy Economics, 16(4), pp. 321-334, 1994.
6. Easter, K.W., Dinar, A. & Rosegrant, M., Markets for Water: Potential and Performance, Kluwer Academic Press: Massachusetts, 1998.
7. Kloezen, W., Water markets between Mexican water user associations. Water Policy, 1, pp. 437-455, 1998.
8. Keenan, S.P., Krannich, R.S. & Walker, M.S., Public perceptions of water transfers and markets: describing differences in water use communities. Society and Natural Resources, 12, pp. 279-292, 1999.
9. Nieuwoudt, W.L., Water market institutions: lessons from Colorado. Agrekon, 39(1), pp. 58-67, 2000.
10. Kumar, M. & Singh, O., Market instruments for demand management in the face of scarcity and overuse of water in Gujarat, Western India. Water Policy, 3, pp. 387-403, 2001.
11. Arriaza, M., Gomez-Limon, J.A. & Upton, M., Local water markets for irrigation in southern Spain: a multi-criteria approach. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 46(1), pp. 21-43, 2002.
12. Fisher, F.M., Arlosoroff, S., Eckstein, Z., Haddadin, M., Hamati, S.G., Huber-Lee, A. & Jarrar, A., Optimal water management and conflict resolution: The Middle East Water Project. Water Resources Research, 38(1), pp. 1-16, 2002.
13. Louw, D.B., The Development of a Methodology to Determine the True Value of Water and the Impact of a Potential Water Market on the Efficient Utilisation of Water in the Berg River Basin, Report no. 943/1/02, Water Research Commission: Pretoria, 2002.
14. Bateman, I.A., Lovett, A.A. & Brainard, J.S., Applied Environmental Economics, Cambridge University Press: UK, 2003.
15. Bergson, A., On the concept of social welfare. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 68(2), pp. 233-252, 1954.
16. Arrow, K., Formal theories of social welfare. Collected Papers of Kenneth Arrow: Social Choice and Justice, Harvard University Press: Oxford, UK, pp. 115-132, 1984.
17. Pearce, D.W., Economic Values and the Environment, The MIT Press: UK, 1993.
18. Goodstein, E.S., Economics and the Environment, Prentice Hall Publishers: New Jersey, 1999.
19. Mander, M., Cox, D., Turpie, J. & Breen, C., Incorporating Economic Considerations into Quantification, Allocation and Management of the Environmental Water Reserve, Report no. 978/1/02, Water Research Commission: Pretoria, 2002.
20. Randall, A., The problem of market failure. Natural Resource Journal, 23, pp. 131-148, 1983.
21. Livingston, M.L., Designing water institutions: market failures and institutional response. Water Resources Management, 9, pp. 203-220, 1995.
22. Elster, J., Rational Choice, New York University Press: New York, 1986.
23. Belton, V. & Stewart, T.J., Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach, Kluwer Academic Press: London, 2002.
24. Romero, C. & Rehman, T., Multiple-Criteria Analysis for Agricultural Decisions, Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2003.
25. Hobbs, B., Chankong, V. & Hamadeh, W., Does choice of multi-criteria method matter: an experiment in water resource planning. Water Resources Research, 28(7), pp. 1767-1779, 1992.
26. Stewart, T.J., Joubert, A.R., Scott, L. & Low, T., Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: Procedures for Consensus Seeking in Natural Resources Management, Report no. 512/1/97, Water Research Commission: Pretoria, 1997.
27. Stewart, T.J., Joubert, A.R. & Liu, D., Group Decision Support Methods to Facilitate Participative Water Resource Management, Report no. 863/1/01, Water Research Commission: Pretoria, 2001.
28. Tecle, A., Selecting a multi-criterion decision making technique for watershed resources management. Water Resources Bulletin, 28(1), pp. 129-140, 1992.
29. City of Cape Town: Water services, Integrated Water Resource Planning and CMA Bulk Water Supply Studies, Report no. unknown, Ninham Shand and CSIR: Cape Town, 2002.
30. Eberhard, R. & Joubert, A.R., CMA Bulk Water Supply Study: An Evaluation of Additional Water Supply Options using MCDA, Report no. 3245/9531, Palmer Development Group and Ninham Shand Consulting Services: Cape Town, 2002.
31. Kleynhans, S., CMA Bulk Water Supply Study: Main Report, Report no. 3245/9531, Ninham Shand Consulting Services: Cape Town, 2002.
32. Kleynhans, S., Integration of Raw Water Sources Supplying the CMA, Report no. 3243/9690, Ninham Shand Consulting Services: Cape Town, 2002.
33. Joubert, A., Stewart, T.J. & Eberhard, R., Evaluation of water supply augmentation and water demand management options for the City of Cape Town. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 12(1), pp. 17-25, 2003.
34. Van Rooyen, P.C., Personal communication, Head of the Department, Western Cape Department of Agriculture, Elsenburg, 2005.
35. Van Zyl, G., Personal communication, Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Cape Town, 2005.
36. Killick, M., Personal communication, City of Cape Town Administration, Water Management Services, Cape Town, 2006.
37. Alvarez-Farizo, B. & Hanley, N., Using conjoint analysis to quantify public preferences over the environmental impacts of wind farms: an example from Spain. Energy Policy, 30, pp. 107-116, 2002.
38. Mostert, H., Personal communication, City of Cape Town Administration, City Engineers (Water Services), Cape Town, 2004.
39. Muller, J., Personal communication, City of Cape Town Administration, City Engineers (Water Services), Cape Town, 2005.
40. Day, J., Personal communication, Department of Zoology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, 2005.
41. Curtis, I.A., Valuing ecosystem goods and services: a new approach using a surrogate market and the combination of a multiple criteria analysis and a Delphi panel to assign weights to the attributes. Ecological Economics, 50, pp. 163-194, 2004.