Analysis of Interfraction Prostate Motion Using Megavoltage Cone Beam Computed Tomography

International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

Volumn 72, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 949-956

  Bylund, Kevin C ^a   Bayouth, John E ^a   Smith, Mark C ^a   Hass, A Curtis ^a   Bhatia, Sudershan K ^a   Buatti, John M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cone beam computed tomography; Interfraction; Movement; Prostatic neoplasms; Radiotherapy

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC RADIOGRAPHY; ELECTROTHERAPEUTICS; GAIT ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MEDICAL IMAGING; RADIOTHERAPY; THERMOGRAPHY (TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT); THREE DIMENSIONAL; TOMOGRAPHY;

ANTERIOR-POSTERIOR DIRECTION; AP DIRECTION; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CT DATA; DIRECT METHOD; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; INTERFRACTION; INTEROBSERVER VARIATION; INTRAOBSERVER VARIATION; LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER; MEGA-VOLTAGE CONE BEAM; MEGAVOLTAGE; MOVEMENT; ORGAN MOTION; PLANNING TARGET VOLUME; PRE TREATMENTS; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RANDOM DEVIATIONS; SINGLE-AXIS; TREATMENT PLANNING;

IMAGING TECHNIQUES;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MALE; MEGAVOLTAGE RADIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE; PROSTATE CANCER; TREATMENT PLANNING;

CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; PUBIC BONE; RADIOTHERAPY DOSAGE; RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOTHERAPY, CONFORMAL; RADIOTHERAPY, INTENSITY-MODULATED; RECTUM; URINARY BLADDER;

EID: 52949093545     PISSN: 03603016     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Pollack A., Zagars G.K., Starkschall G., et al. Prostate cancer radiation dose response: Results of the M.D. Anderson phase III randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53 (2002) 1097-1105
2. Kupelian P.A., Potters L., Khuntia D., et al. Radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy <72 Gy, external beam radiotherapy > or =72 Gy, permanent seed implantation, or combined seeds/external beam radiotherapy for stage T1-T2 prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58 (2004) 25-33
3. Storey M.R., Pollack A., Zagars G., et al. Complications from radiotherapy dose escalation in prostate cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 48 (2000) 635-642
4. Peeters S.T., Lebesque J.V., Heemsbergen W.D., et al. Localized volume effects for late rectal and anal toxicity after radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 64 (2006) 1151-1161
5. Zietman A.L., DeSilvio M.L., Slater J.D., et al. Comparison of conventional-dose vs high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 294 (2005) 1233-1239
6. Chen M.E., Johnston D.A., Tang K., et al. Detailed mapping of prostate carcinoma foci: Biopsy strategy implications. Cancer 89 (2000) 1800-1809
7. Pouliot J., Bani-Hashemi A., Chen J., et al. Low-dose megavoltage cone-beam CT for radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61 (2005) 552-560
8. Kupelian P., Willoughby T., Mahadevan A., et al. Multi-institutional clinical experience with the Calypso system in localization and continuous, real-time monitoring of the prostate gland during external radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67 (2007) 1088-1098
9. Scarbrough T.J., Golden N.M., Ting J.Y., et al. Comparison of ultrasound and implanted seed marker prostate localization methods: Implications for image-guided radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65 (2006) 378-387
10. Letourneau D., Martinez A.A., Lockman D., et al. Assessment of residual error for online cone-beam CT-guided treatment of prostate cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62 (2005) 1239-1246
11. Smitsmans M.H., Wolthaus J.W., Artignan X., et al. Automatic localization of the prostate for on-line or off-line image-guided radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60 (2004) 623-635
12. Dong L., de Crevoisier R., Bonnen M., et al. Evaluation of an ultrasound-based prostate target localization technique with an in-room CT-on-rails. [abstract]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60 Suppl. 1 (2004) S332-S333
13. Morin O., Descovich M., Aubin M., et al. Plan modifications to compensate for the dose delivered by daily megavoltage cone-beam CT imaging. [abstract]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66 Suppl. 1 (2006) S637
14. Khan F.M. The physics of radiation therapy. 3rd ed. (2003), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
15. van Herk M. Errors and margins in radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 14 (2004) 52-64
16. Stroom J.C., de Boer H.C., Huizenga H., et al. Inclusion of geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning by means of coverage probability. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 43 (1999) 905-919
17. Hoogeman M.S., van Herk M., de Bois J., et al. Strategies to reduce the systematic error due to tumor and rectum motion in radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 74 (2005) 177-185
18. Moseley D.J., White E.A., Wiltshire K.L., et al. Comparison of prostate localization performance with implanted fiducial markers and cone-beam computed tomography for on-line image-guided radiation of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67 (2007) 942-953
19. Létourneau D., Martinez A.A., Lockman D., et al. Assessment of residual error for online cone-beam CT-guided treatment of prostate cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62 (2005) 1239-1246
20. Kupelian P.A., Lee C., Langen K.M., et al. Evaluation of image-guidance strategies in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70 (2008) 1151-1157
21. Frank S.J., Dong L., Kudchadker R.J., et al. Quantification of prostate and seminal vesicle interfraction variation during IMRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 71 (2007) 813-820
22. Gayou O., and Miften M. Comparison of mega-voltage cone-beam computed tomography prostate localization with online ultrasound and fiducial markers methods. Med Phys 35 (2008) 531-538
23. Pinkawa M., Siluschek J., Gagel B., et al. Influence of the initial rectal distension on posterior margins in primary and postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 81 (2006) 284-290
24. Zellars R.C., Roberson P.L., Strawderman M., et al. Prostate position late in the course of external beam therapy: Patterns and predictors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47 (2000) 655-660
25. Antolak J.A., Rosen II, Childress C.H., et al. Prostate target volume variations during a course of radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 42 (1998) 661-672
26. Hoogeman M.S., van Herk M., de Bois J., et al. Quantification of local rectal wall displacements by virtual rectum unfolding. Radiother Oncol 70 (2004) 21-30
27. Nijkamp J., Pos F.J., Nuver T.T., et al. Adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer using kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography: First clinical results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70 (2008) 75-82
28. Brabbins D., Martinez A., Yan D., et al. A dose-escalation trial with the adaptive radiotherapy process as a delivery system in localized prostate cancer: Analysis of chronic toxicity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61 (2005) 400-408
29. Vargas C., Yan D., Kestin L.L., et al. Phase II dose escalation study of image-guided adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Use of dose-volume constraints to achieve rectal isotoxicity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63 (2005) 141-149
30. Nuver T.T., Hoogeman M.S., Remeijer P., et al. An adaptive off-line procedure for radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67 (2007) 1559-1567
31. Ghilezan M.J., Jaffray D.A., Siewerdsen J.H., et al. Prostate gland motion assessed with cine-magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62 (2005) 406-417
32. de Crevoisier R., Melancon A.D., Kuban D.A., et al. Changes in the pelvic anatomy after an IMRT treatment fraction of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68 (2007) 1529-1536
33. Rasch C., Barillot I., Remeijer P., et al. Definition of the prostate in CT and MRI: A multi-observer study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 43 (1999) 57-66