Trigeminal event-related potentials in patients with olfactory dysfunction

Rhinology

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 170-174

  Rombaux, Philippe ^a   Mouraux, A ^b   Keller, T ^c   Hummel, T ^d  

^a CLINIQUES UNIVERSITAIRES SAINT LUC   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^c ACOMED Statistik   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF DRESDEN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Olfaction; Orthonasal testing; Smell; Trigeminal and olfactory event related potential

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OLFACTORY SYSTEM; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SMELLING; SMELLING DISORDER; TRIGEMINAL NERVE;

ADULT; AGED; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OLFACTION DISORDERS; OLFACTORY PATHWAYS; OLFACTORY PERCEPTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TRIGEMINAL NERVE;

EID: 52949092692     PISSN: 03000729     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Cain, WS, Murphy C. Interaction between chemoreceptive modalities of odour and irritation. Nature 1980; 284: 255-257.
2. Schaeffer ML, Bottger B, Silver WI, Finger TE. Trigeminal collaterals in the nasal epithelium and olfactory bulb; a potential route for direct modulation of olfactory information by trigeminal stimuli. J Comp Neurol. 2002; 444: 221-226.
3. Frasnelli J, Hummel T. Interactions between the chemical senses: Trigeminal function in patients with olfactory loss. Int J Psychophysiology 2007; 65: 177-181.
4. Kobal G, Hummel T. Olfactory and intranasal trigeminal event-related potentials in anosmic patients. Laryngoscope 1998; 108: 1033-1035.
5. Lötsch J, Hummel T. The clinical significance of eletrophysiological measures of olfactory function. Behav Brain Res 2006; 170: 78-83.
6. Rombaux P, Bertrand B, Keller T, Mouraux A. Clinical significance of olfactory event related potentials related to orthonasal and retronasal olfactory testing. Laryngoscope 2007; 117: 1096-1101.
7. Hummel T, Barz S, Lötsch J, Roscher S, Kettenmann B, Kobal G. Loss of olfactory function leads to a decrease of trigeminal sensitivity. Chem Senses 1996; 21: 75-79.
8. Laska M, Distel H, Hudson R. Trigeminal perception of odorant quality in congenitally anosmic subjects. Chem Senses 1997; 22: 447-456.
9. Hummel T, Kobal G, Gudziol H, Mackay-Sim A. Normative data for the Sniffin sticks including tests of odour identification, odour discrimination and olfactory tresholds; an upgrade based on a group of more than 3000 subjects. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2006; 264: 237-243.
10. Mouraux A. LetsWave; an EEG signal-processing toolbox written in Borland Delphi. http://www.md.ucl.ac.be/nefy/facecatlab/mouraux.
11. SPSS for Windows 15.0. http://www.spss.com
12. Frasnelli J, Schuster B, Hummel T. Subjects with congenital anosmia have larger peripheral but similar central trigeminal responses. Cereb Cortex 2007; 17: 370-377.
13. Frasnelli J, Schuster B, Hummel T. Interactions between olfaction and the trigeminal system: What can be learned from olfactory loss? Cereb Cortex 2007; 17: 2268-2275.
14. Frasnelli J, Schuster B, Zahnert T, Hummel T. Chemosensory specific reduction of trigeminal sensitivity in subjects with olfactory dysfunction. Neuroscience 2006; 142: 541-546.
15. Husner A, Frasnelli J, Welge-Lüssen A, Reiss G, Zahnert T, Hummel T. Loss of trigeminal sensitivity reduces olfactory function. Laryngoscope 2006; 116: 1520-1522.
16. Hummel T, Doty RL, Youssem DM. Functional MRI of intranasal chemosensory trigeminal stimulation. Chem Senses 2005; 30: 205-206.