Dynamic sub-ontology evolution for traditional Chinese medicine web ontology

Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 790-805

  Mao, Yuxin ^a   Wu, Zhaohui ^a   Tian, Wenya ^b   Jiang, Xiaohong ^a   Cheung, William K ^c  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Zhejiang Economic and Trade Polytechnic   (China)

^c HONG KONG BAPTIST UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Evolutionary computation; Knowledge; Ontology; Sub ontology; Traditional Chinese medicine

Indexed keywords

GENETIC ALGORITHMS; HEALTH; INFORMATION THEORY; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; MEDICINE;

DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE; EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION; KNOWLEDGE; KNOWLEDGE STRUCTURING; LARGE-SCALE ONTOLOGIES; ON-DEMAND; ONTOLOGY-BASED SYSTEMS; OVERALL PERFORMANCE; SEMANTIC HETEROGENEITY; SUB-ONTOLOGY; TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE; WEB ONTOLOGY;

ONTOLOGY;

ARTICLE; CHINESE MEDICINE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; EVOLUTION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; KNOWLEDGE BASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; WEB BROWSER;

ANIMALS; DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; EXPERT SYSTEMS; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; INTERNET; KNOWLEDGE BASES; MEDICINE, CHINESE TRADITIONAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; SEMANTICS; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 52949083177     PISSN: 15320464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.05.008     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Cai J.F. A historical overview of traditional chinese medicine and ancient chinese medical ethics. Ethik in der Medizin 10 (1998) S84-S91
2. Mao YX, Wu ZH, Xu Z, et al. Interactive semantic-based visualization environment for traditional chinese medicine information. In: Proceedings of 7th Asia-Pacific web conference; 2005. p. 950-9.
3. Gruber T. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl Acquis 5 2 (1993) 199-220
4. Heijst G.V., Schreiber A.T., and Wielinga B.J. Using explicit ontologies in KBS Development. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 46 2/3 (1997) 183-292
5. Berners-Lee T., Hendler J., and Lassila O. The semantic web. Sci Am 284 5 (2001) 34-43
6. Bodenreider O. Unified medical language system (UMLS): integrating biomedical terminology. Nucleic Acids Res 32 D (2004) D267-D270
7. Ashburner M., Ball C.A., Blake J.A., Botstein D., et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The gene ontology consortium. Nat Genet 25 (2000) 25-29
8. Patricia L., et al. The MGED ontology: a resource for semantics-based description of microarray experiments. Bioinformatics 22 7 (2006) 866-873
9. Yu A.C. A methods in biomedical ontology. J Biomed Inform 39 2006 (2006) 252-266
10. Fahmi I, Zhang J, Ellermann H, Bouma G. SWHi system description: a case study in information retrieval, inference, and visualization in the semantic web. In: Proceedings of ESWC; 2007. p. 769-78.
11. Lucene, url. Available from: http://lucene.apache.org/.
12. TCMLS, url. Available from: http://sharelab.cintcm.com/TCMLSOntoEdit/demo/test/browser.html.
13. Klyne G, Carroll JJ. Resource description framework (RDF): concepts and abstract syntax. W3C Recommendation, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C); 2004. Available from: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/.
14. McGuinness DL, Harmelen FV. OWL web ontology language overview. W3C Recommendation, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C); 2004. Available from: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-features-20040210.
15. Qooxdoo, url. Available from: http://www.qooxdoo.org/.
16. Ghidini C., and Giunchiglia F. Local models semantics, or contextual reasoning = locality + compatibility. Artif Intell 127 (2001) 221-259
17. Lenat D.B. Cyc: a large-scale investment in knowledge infra-structure. Commun ACM 38 11 (1995) 33-38
18. Blair P, Guha RV, Pratt W. Microtheories: an ontological engineer's guide. Technical Report Cyc-050-92; 1992. Available from: http://www.cyc.com/tech-reports/cyc-050-92/cyc-050-92.html.
19. Chen HJ, Wang YM, Wang H, Mao YX, et al., Towards a semantic web of relational databases: a practical semantic toolkit and an in-use case from traditional Chinese medicine. In: Proceedings of international semantic web conference; 2006. p. 750-63.
20. Mao YX, Cheung WK, Wu ZH, Liu JM. Dynamic sub-ontology evolution for collaborative problem-solving. In: Proceedings of AAAI fall symposium; 2005; v FS-05-01. p. 1-8.
21. Baader A.F., and Nutt W. Basic description logics. In: Baader F., Calvanese D., McGuinness D., Nardi D., and Patel-Schneider P. (Eds). The description logic handbook: theory, implementation, and applications (2003), Cambridge University Press
22. Levenshtein I.V. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Cybern Control Theory 10 8 (1966) 707-710
23. Mena E., Kashyap V., Illaramendi A., and Sheth A. Imprecise answers in distributed environments: estimation of information loss for multiple ontology based query processing. Int J Cooper Inf Syst 9 4 (2000) [Special issue on Intelligent Integration of Information]
24. Dar S, Franklin M, Jonsson B, et al. Semantic data caching and replacement. In: Proceedings of international conference on very large data bases; 1996. p. 330-41.
25. Grau BC, Parsia B, Sirin E, et al. Modularity and web ontologies. In: Proceedings of international conference on the principles of knowledge representation and reasoning; 2006. p. 198-209.
26. Baader F., and Sattler U. An overview of tableau algorithms for description logics. Studia Logica 69 (2001) 5-40
27. Schmidt-Schaulß M., and Smolka G. Attributive concept descriptions with complements. Artif Intell 48 1 (1991) 1-26
28. Klein M, Fensel D. Ontology versioning for the semantic web. In: Proceedings of international semantic web working symposium; 2001. p. 483-93.
29. Noy NF, Klein M. Ontology evolution: not the same as schema evolution. SMI Technical Report SMI-2002-0926, Stanford Medical Informatics; 2002.
30. Holland J.H. Adaption in natural and artificial systems (1975), MIT Press
31. Chamber L. Practical handbook of genetic algorithms (1995), CRC Press
32. Goldberg D.E. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning (1989), Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. Inc.
33. Smith A.J. Cache memories. Comput Surveys 14 3 (1982)
34. Edward G., Coffman J., and Peter J.D. Operating systems theory (1973), Prentice-Hall
35. Jena, url. Available from: http://jena.sourceforge.net/.
36. Noy NF, Musen MA. Specifying ontology views by traversal. In: Proceedings of 3rd international semantic web conference; 2004. p. 713-25.
37. Seidenberg J, Rector A. Web ontology segmentation: analysis, classification and use. In: Proceedings of international conference on world wide web; 2006. p. 13-22.
38. Doran P. Ontology reuse via ontology modularisation. In: Proceedings of knowledge web Ph.D. symposium, Budva, Montenegro; 2006.
39. Bouquet P, Giunchiglia F, Harmelen FV, et al. C-OWL: con-textualizing ontologies. In: Proceedings of international semantic web conference; 2003. p. 164-79.
40. Zhao Y, Wang K, Topor R, Pan JZ, Giunchiglia F. Semantic cooperation and knowledge reuse by using autonomous ontology. Technical Report DIT-07-026, Informatica eTelecomu-nicazioni, University of Trento; 2007. Available from: http://eprints.biblio.unitn.it/archive/00001210/.
41. Wiederhold G. An algebra for ontology composition. ARPA and Stanford University. Gio Wiederhold. ARPA and Stanford University; 1994. Available from: http://infolab.stanford.edu/pub/gio/1994/onto.ps.
42. Bernstein P.A., Levy A.Y., and Pottinger R.A. A vision for management of complex models. SIGMOD Rec 29 4 (2000) 55-63