EC law, the environment and consumers: Addressing the challenge of incorporating an environmental dimension to consumer protection at community level

Journal of Consumer Policy

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 1-43

  Hedemann Robinson, Martin ^a  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 52849118962     PISSN: 01687034     EISSN: 15730700     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1006872527625     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Alder, J. (1994). Environmental impact assessment - The inadequacies of English law. Journal of Environmental Law, 6, 203-220.
2. Chalmers, D. (1994). Environmental protection and the Single Market: An unsustainable development. Does the EC Treaty need a Title on the Environment? Legal Issues in European Integration, 1994, 1, 65-98.
3. Cheyne, I. (1994). International agreements and the EC legal system. European Law Review, 19, 581-598.
4. Coleman, M. (1994). Environmental barriers to trade and EC law. In: A. Boyle (Ed.), Environmental regulation and growth, pp. 131-171. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Crowther, P. (1995). The Court of Justice: Taking taxes seriously? In: F. Shaw & G. More (Eds.), New legal dynamics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Demiray, D. A. (1994). The movement of goods in a green market. Legal Issues in European Integration, 1994, 1, 73-110.
7. Geddes, A. (1992). Locus standi and EC environmental measures. Journal of Environmental Law, 4, 29-39.
8. Geradin, D. (1993a). Case note on the Belgian waste case. European Law Review, 18, 144-153.
9. Geradin, D. (1993b). Trade and environmental protection: Community harmonization and national environmental standards. Yearbook of European Law, 13, 157-199.
10. Grabitz, E. (1992). EWG-Vertrag. München: Verlag C. H. Beck.
11. Grabitz, E., & Zacker, C. (1989). Scope for action by the EC Member States for the improvement of environmental protection under EEC law: The example of environmental taxes and subsidies. Common Market Law Review, 26, 423-447.
12. Hedemann-Robinson, M. (1994). The individual and the EC Ombudsman. New Law Journal, 144, 609-611.
13. Hedemann-Robinson, M. (1995). Indirect discrimination: Article 95(1) EC back to front and inside out? European Public Law Journal, 1(3), 439-468.
14. Hedemann-Robinson, M. (1996). Article 173 EC, general Community measures and locus standi for private persons: Still a cause for individual concern? European Public Law Journal, 2(1), 127-156.
15. Hedemann-Robinson, M. (forthcoming). Indirect discrimination law in the EC: Appearance rather than reality? International Journal of Discrimination and the Law.
16. Huffman, J. L. (1995). Markets, regulation and environmental protection. Montana Law Review, 56, 425-434.
17. Kimber, C. (1995). A comparison of environmental federalism in the United States and the European Union. Maryland Law Review, 54, 1658-1690.
18. Kleftodimou, L. (1995). Protecting the consumer under GATT. Consumer Law Journal, 3, 174-187.
19. Krämer, L. (1987). The Single European Act and environmental protection: Reflections on several new provisions in Community law. Common Market Law Review, 24, 659-688.
20. Krämer, L. (1991). The implementation of Community environmental directives within Member States: Some implications of the direct effect doctrine. Journal of Environmental Law, 3, 39-56.
21. Krämer, L. (1993a). On the interrelationship between consumer and environmental policies in the EC. Journal of Consumer Policy, 16, 455-467.
22. Krämer, L. (1993b). Environmental protection and Article 30 EEC. Common Market Law Review, 30, 111-143.
23. Krämer, L. (1993c). European environmental law casebook. London: Sweet and Maxwell.
24. Krämer, L. (1995). EC Treaty and environmental law. London: Sweet and Maxwell.
25. Kye, C. (1995). Environmental law and the consumer in the European Union. Journal of Environmental Law, 7, 31-54.
26. Macrory, R. (1992). The enforcement of Community environmental laws: Some critical issues. Common Market Law Review, 29, 347-369.
27. Maresceau, M. (1986). The GATT in the caselaw of the European Court of Justice. In: M. Hilf & E.-U. Petersmann (Eds.), The EEC and GATT, pp. 107-140. The Hague: Kluwer.
28. Menell, P. S. (1995). Structuring a market-oriented federal eco-info policy. Maryland Law Review, 54, 1435-1474.
29. Petersmann, E.-U. (1983). Application of GATT by the Court of Justice of the European Communities. Common Market Law Review, 30, 397-437.
30. Petersmann, E.-U. (1994). The dispute settlement system of the WTO and the evolution of the GATT dispute settlement system since 1948. Common Market Law Review, 31, 1157-1244.
31. Reich, N. (1994). Protection of consumers' economic interests by the European Community. Sydney Law Review, 14, 23-61.
32. Sands, P. (1990). EC environmental law: Legislation, the European Court of Justice and common interest groups. Modern Law Review, 53, 685-698.
33. Scherhorn, G. (1993). Consumers' concern about the environment and its impact on business. Journal of Consumer Policy, 16, 171-191.
34. Scott, J. (1995). The GATT and community law. In: F. Shaw & G. More (Eds.), New legal dynamics, pp. 147-164. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Wägenbaur, R. (1991). The European Community's policy on implementation of environmental directives. Fordham International Law Journal, 14, 455-477.
36. Ward, A. (1994). The right to an effective remedy in EC law and environmental protection. Journal of Environmental Law, 6, 221-244.
37. Weatherill, S. (1994). The role of the informed consumer in EC law and policy. Consumer Law Journal, 2, 49-69.
38. Wils, W. (1994). Subsidiarity and EC environmental policy: Taking people's concerns seriously. Journal of Environmental Law, 6, 85-91.